Clinical risk factors to predict prognosis in wake-up stroke patients: A retrospective study

Qiwu Xu,Miaomiao Hu,Guoxiang Tan,Yong Zhao,Hao Yin,Ting Ding,Ying Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000040584
IF: 1.6
2024-11-28
Medicine
Abstract:Wake-up stroke (WUS) is a unique type of acute ischemic stroke, characterized by the sudden onset of symptoms at awakening in previously asymptomatic individuals. [ 1 ] Due to the patient's illness during sleep, the exact onset time of the disease is unknown, often resulting in exclusion from thrombolytic treatment and a missed opportunity for optimal intervention, ultimately leading to poor prognosis. Studies have demonstrated that multimodal imaging can accurately assess the onset time of patients with WUS and guide intravenous thrombolytic therapy. [ 2 ] Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is highly sensitive to early lesions, which can be detected as early as 2 hours after onset, while fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) typically shows abnormal signals at around 4.5 hours after onset. Therefore, when there is a mismatch between DWI and FLAIR findings, it may suggest an ischemic stroke onset time within 4.5 hours, and intravenous thrombolysis could be considered to improve patient prognosis. [ 3 , 4 ] Research has demonstrated that intravenous thrombolysis with plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is the only safe and effective treatment for WUS patients within 4.5 hours of onset, [ 5 ] thereby increasing the proportion of WUS patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis. However, certain patients present with a poor prognosis, and it is necessary to further clarify the factors associated with poor prognosis.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?