Abstract:Abstract Objectives Does the manipulation of the off-pump CABG (OPCAB) in patient with depressed left ventricular function is better than on-pump CABG (ONCAB) approach in in-hospital mortality and morbidities? Here we undertook a meta-analysis of the best evidence available on the comparison of primary and second clinical outcomes of the off-pump and on-pump CABG. Design Systematic literature reviewer and meta-analysis. Data sources PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science and Cochrane Center Registry of Controlled Trials were searched the studies which comparing the use of the off-pump CABG(OPCAB) and on-pump CABG (ONCAB) for patients with LVD during January 1990.1 to January 2018. Eligibility criteria All observation studies and randomized controlled trials comparing on-pump and off-pump as main technique for multi-vessel coronary artery disease (defined as severe stenosis (>70%) in at least 2 major diseased coronary arteries) with left ventricular dysfunction(defined as ejection fraction (EF) 40% or less) were included. Data extraction and synthesis Authors will screen and select the studies extract the following data, first author, year of publication, trial characters, study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, graft type, clinical outcome, assess the risk of bias and heterogeneity. Study-specific estimates will pool through the modification of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the quality of study and while leave-one-out analysis will be used to detect the impact of individual studies on the robustness of outcomes. Results Among the 987 screened articles, a total of 16 studies (32,354 patients) were included. A significant relationship between patient risk profile and benefits from OPCAB was found in terms of the 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73–0.97; P = 0.02), stroke (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.55–0.86; P = 0.00), myocardial infarction (MI) (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53–0.96; P = 0.02), renal failure (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55–0.93; P = 0.01), pulmonary complication (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52–0.90; P = 0.01), infection (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49–0.91; P = 0.00),postoperative transfusion (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08–0.84; P = 0.02) and reoperation for bleeding (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.41–0.75; P = 0.00). There was no significant difference in atrial fibrillation (AF) (OR, 0.96;95%; CI, 0.78–1.41; P = 0.56) and neurological dysfunction (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.49–1.57; P = 0.65). Conclusions Compared with the on-pump CABG with LVD, using the off-pump CABG is a better choice for patients with lower mortality, stroke, MI, RF, pulmonary complication, infection, postoperative transfusion and reoperation for bleeding. Further randomized studies are warranted to corroborate these observational data.

Mode of rat cecal enlargement induced by a short-term feeding on glucomannan.

Short-term and Long-term Postoperative Safety of Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Coronary Heart Disease: A Meta-analysis for Randomized Controlled Trials.

Partially anaortic clampless off-pump coronary artery bypass prevents neurologic injury compared to on-pump coronary surgery: a propensity score-matched study on 286 patients

Aortic no-touch technique makes the difference in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

A Prognostic Index to Identify Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Who Could Benefit From Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin

Toward stroke-free coronary surgery: The role of the anaortic off-pump bypass technique

Operability in transposition of great arteries with ventricular septal defect: A difficult question - is the answer really so simple?

Improvement of chemosensitivity and inhibition of migration via targeting tumor epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition cells by ADH-1-modified liposomes

Device Use for Proximal Anastomosis on Ascending Aorta in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

CENTRAL SERVICE DEPARTMENT AS A TEACHING CENTER.

HEARTSTRING enabled no-touch proximal anastomosis for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: current evidence and technique

Progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy with magnetic resonance imaging verification and therapeutic trials with interferon

Microsurgical removal of Onyx HD-500 from an aneurysm for relief of brainstem compression. Case report.

Avoidance of aortic side-clamping for proximal bypass anastomoses: better short-term outcome?

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with clampless aortic anastomosis devices: Aortic sealing devices versus automated anastomosis punching

Clinical outcomes of on-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis

Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide appears to be one of the mediators in misoprostol‐enhanced small intestinal transit in rats

Novel surgical method of proximal anastomosis in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting

Short-term Outcomes of On- Vs Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Left Ventricular Dysfunction: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Off versus on pump myocardial revascularization in patients with severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis

Early and late outcomes after minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass vs. full sternotomy off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting