Abstract:Background: Minimally invasive continuous cardiac output measurements are recommended for use during anesthesia to guide fluid therapy, but such measurements must trend changes reliably. The NICOM Cheetah, a BioReactance monitor, is being recommended for intraoperative use. To validate its use, Doppler methods, suprasternal USCOM and esophageal CardioQ, were used in tandem to provide reliable estimates of changing trends in cardiac output. Preliminary comparisons showed that upper abdominal surgical interventions caused shifts in the calibration of the NICOM. The purpose of this study was to confirm and measure these calibration shifts. Methods: Major surgery patients, aged 58 (32-78) years, 12 males and 15 females, were divided into 4 study groups: (a) controls-lower abdominal or peripheral surgery (n = 9); (b) laparoscopy with abdominal insufflation (n = 6); (c) open upper abdominal surgery with large multiblade retractor placement (n = 6) and (d) head-down robotic surgery (n = 6). Simultaneous NICOM and Doppler readings were taken every 15 to 30 minutes. Within-individual time plots were drawn, and regression analysis between NICOM-USCOM and CardioQ-USCOM readings was performed. Bland-Altman and trend (concordance) analyses were also performed. Results: Three hundred ninety NICOM comparisons were collected. Duration of surgeries was 4 (1½ to 11) hours, with 7 to 22 sets of readings per case. Mean (SD) cardiac index from USCOM readings was 3.5(1.0) L/min/m. Individual time plots showed shifts in NICOM calibration relative to Doppler (USCOM) in cardiac index of ±0.9 (0.6-1.4) L/min/m during the surgical interventions. In 13 of 18 patients (72%), the shift was downward, but upward shifts did occur. Within-individual correlations between CardioQ-USCOM showed good trending R = 0.87 (range, 0.60-0.97). In the control group, NICOM-USCOM also showed good trending R = 0.89 (0.69-0.97). However, trending was poor in the intervention groups, R = 0.43 (0.03-0.71; P < 0.0001). The Bland-Altman percentage error between NICOM-USCOM (57 [54-60]%) was greater than that between CardioQ-USCOM (42 [40-44]%) (P < 0.0001). Concordance rates were 82 (77-88)% from 101 data pairs and 95 (90-99)% from 72 data pairs, respectively. Conclusions: Doppler monitoring used in tandem provided valid trend lines of cardiac output changes against which NICOM readings could be compared. Intraoperatively, the NICOM was shown to track changes in cardiac output reliably in most circumstances. However, surgical interventions to the upper abdomen caused shifts in readings by >1 L/min/m, and the direction of the shifts was unpredictable. Anesthesiologists need to be aware of these calibration shifts and anticipate their occurrence, whenever the NICOM is used intraoperatively.

The effect of head up tilting on bioreactance cardiac output and stroke volume readings using suprasternal transcutaneous Doppler as a control in healthy young adults

Simulation of Cardiovascular Response to the Head-Up/Head-Down Tilt at Different Angles

Major Upper Abdominal Surgery Alters the Calibration of Bioreactance Cardiac Output Readings, the NICOM, When Comparisons Are Made Against Suprasternal and Esophageal Doppler Intraoperatively

Comparison of Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor and Pulse Indicated Continuous Cardiac Output Monitor on Determination of Hemodynamic Parameters in Critical Patients

A Comparison of Haemodynamic Responses between Head-Up Tilt and Lower Body Negative Pressure

Age-Related Differences in Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Responses During the Head-Up Tilt Test: An Exploratory Study Using Continuous Biosignal Data

Resting heart rate predicts cardiac autonomic modulation during passive head-up tilt in subjects without cardiovascular diseases

Mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure in critically ill patients: comparison of CW-Doppler ultrasound cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) and thermodilution (PiCCO)

Comparisons of heart rate variability responses to head-up tilt with and without abdominal and lower-extremity compression in healthy young individuals: a randomized crossover study

Small changes in the transducer position cause a systematic change in cardiac output readings: implications for clinical practice

Ventilatory response to head-down-tilt in healthy human subjects

Bioreactance noninvasive cardiac output monitoring in euvolemic adult horses subjected with 7.2% saline and 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4) solution infusions

Non-invasive Cardiac Output Measurement in Children Using Bioreactance:A Comparison with Echocar-Diography

Changes in pulmonary venous return during head-up tilting in man

Comparison Of The Correlation Of Rebreathing Method And Echocardiography In Heart Failure Patients With Moderate To Severe Mitral Regurgitation

Validation of the Use of Foreign Gas Rebreathing Method for Non-Invasive Determination of Cardiac Output in Heart Disease Patients

Comparison of Bioimpedance Versus Pulse Contour Analysis for Intraoperative Cardiac Index Monitoring in Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplantation

Effects of the angle of head-down tilt on dynamic cerebral autoregulation during combined exposure to cephalad fluid shift and mild hypercapnia

Blood volume deficit in postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome assessed by semiautomated carbon monoxide rebreathing

A performance comparison of the most commonly used minimally invasive monitors of cardiac output

Comparison of parameter types for the calibration of noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring of patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery in the prone position