Campylobacter fetus Peritonitis in a Patient with an Unused Embedded Subcutaneous Peritoneal Catheter

Kazunori Inoue,Harumi Kitamura,Y. Nagasawa,N. Kawada,Y. Isaka,H. Rakugi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2009.00078

2010-03-01

Peritoneal Dialysis International

Abstract:Editor: Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related infections continue to be serious complications for patients. To reduce catheter-related complications, Kubota et al. developed a new technique of catheter implantation (presternal catheter using the Moncrief technique) (1). It has been reported that the Moncrief and Popovich techniques are not associated with a lower peritonitis rate (2). Here we report a case of catheter infection and peritonitis in a patient with an embedded subcutaneous peritoneal catheter. A 55-year-old man with diabetes mellitus and endstage renal failure was implanted with a presternal catheter about 3 weeks before admission. He had complained of fever and lower abdominal pain for 5 days. His physical examination revealed periumbilical tenderness and skin redness in the epigastric area, above the tip of his embedded subcutaneous catheter. His embedded subcutaneous catheter was exteriorized. A localized subcutaneous abscess around the tip of his embedded catheter was observed and the effluent, after injection of normal saline into the catheter, was cloudy. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan showed no abscess in the abdominal cavity. After Campylobacter fetus was cultured from all samples (blood, abscess, and effluent), antibiotic treatment was changed to intravenous meropenem. A few days af ter star ting the antibiotic treatment, he was afebrile and his abdominal pain was relieved. Antibiotic therapy was continued for 4 weeks and then he was discharged. One month later, his PD catheter was removed because biofilm bacterial colonization of his catheter surfaces was suspected. Peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis contributes to hospitalization and sometimes withdrawal from PD. Campylobacter fetus infection is rare in PD patients (3). This organism often causes bloodstream infections and is associated with tropism for the vascular endothelium. This patient’s peritonitis may have been caused by his having eaten raw liver after insertion of the catheter, which led to transluminal migration, and the offending bacterium traveled to the tip of his embedded subcutatechnique was initially substandard. This reaffirms the suspicion that touch contamination played an important role in her presentation. The patient did not have documented pitted keratolysis on her feet. Although her culture was sensitive to cephalothin and ciprofloxacin in vitro, she did not respond clinically to this regimen. Given that most isolates of this organism are resistant to methicillin, it is possible that her bacteria were actually resistant to first-generation cephalosporins (i.e., cefazolin). The patient made a full recovery with IP vancomycin and there was no need to remove the catheter.