Abstract:Background: In 2022 and 2023 FDA introduced the Project Optimus initiative and the Draft Guidance "Optimizing the Dosage of Human Prescription Drugs and Biological Products for the Treatment of Oncologic Diseases." The FDA's desire is to move away from the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) approach in the development of all oncology drugs and to determine and justify the optimal dosage regimen (ODR), requiring one to evaluate the exposure-response relationship for both the safety and efficacy of oncology drugs. This approach has made the oncology drug developer re-examine their previous beliefs and reconsider the design of the clinical and pre-clinical studies. Processa has begun to implement the ODR evaluation in Phase 1 and pre-clinical studies and will be providing examples as well as how the findings may potentially affect the design of Phase 2/3 trials. Methods/Results: For Next Generation Irinotecan (NGC-Iri), the toxicity and tumor growth inhibition after NGC-Iri administration (as well as tissue distribution of NGC-Iri) were compared to irinotecan in xenograft transplanted mice. Tumor growth inhibition remained constant at 100% for an NGC-Iri dose at the MTD and at 50% of the MTD. However, tumor growth inhibition after irinotecan administration decreased from 100% at the MTD to approximately 64% at 50% of the MTD. The differences seen in the tumor inhibition when NGC-Iri and irinotecan were administered illustrate that the exposure-efficacy profile of NGC-Iri follows a different pattern than the exposure-safety profile and is different from the irinotecan exposure-efficacy profile even though the active molecule is the same. The dose of NGC-Iri can be decreased to improve safety while not significantly sacrificing efficacy, different than what was seen with irinotecan. In a second example, we are evaluating the PK-safety relationship of a different Next Generation drug in our ongoing Phase 1 trial. We have recently found that the exposure-safety relationship is different for our NGC drug than for the approved drug with the same cancer-killing metabolite(s). Based on the difference in exposure-response in the Phase 1 study, we are designing the Phase 2 trial to determine the potential ODR. Conclusion: Both preclinical and Phase 1 oncology trials can be designed to better understand the exposure-response relationships for safety and efficacy which will then help the drug developer in designing the Phase 2 and 3 trials for eventual FDA approval of the ODR. Citation Format: David Young, Sian Bigora, Peter Franks, Mary Nyberg, Yvonne Madden. Application of phase 1 and pre-clinical data to assist in determining the optimal dosage regimen for cancer drugs using the principles of Project Optimus [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited s); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl) nr LB278.

Oncology Combination Drug Development Strategies for Project Optimus

Designing Dose-Optimization Studies in Cancer Drug Development: Discussions with Regulators

Dose Optimization of Targeted Therapies for Oncologic Indications

Three steps towards dose optimization for oncology dose finding

Dose Optimization for Novel Oncology Agents: Design Options and Strategies

DROID: Dose-ranging Approach to Optimizing Dose in Oncology Drug Development

Optimized Combinations of Bortezomib, Camptothecin, and Doxorubicin Show Increased Efficacy and Reduced Toxicity in Treating Oral Cancer.

Optimus-Era Dose Finding for Rare Cancers

Abstract LB278: Application of phase 1 and pre-clinical data to assist in determining the optimal dosage regimen for cancer drugs using the principles of Project Optimus

A seamless phase II/III design with dose optimization for oncology drug development

Dose optimization for cancer treatments with considerations for late-onset toxicities

A Bayesian phase I/II platform design for co-developing drug combination therapies for multiple indications

The patient perspective on dose optimization for anticancer treatments: A new era of cancer drug dosing—Challenging the "more is better" dogma

Seamless Phase II/III Design: a Useful Strategy to Reduce the Sample Size for Dose Optimization

Combination therapies induce cancer cell death through the integrated stress response and disturbed pyrimidine metabolism

A Bayesian Dose Finding Design for Oncology Clinical Trials of Combinational Biological Agents

A multi-arm two-stage (MATS) design for proof-of-concept and dose optimization in early-phase oncology trials

Statistical and practical considerations in planning and conduct of dose-optimization trials

Exposure-Response–Based Multiattribute Clinical Utility Score Framework to Facilitate Optimal Dose Selection for Oncology Drugs

A Bayesian latent-subgroup platform design for dose optimization

Applications of the partial-order continual reassessment method in the early development of treatment combinations