UNTOWARD REACTIONS AND CUTANEOUS TESTING IN PENICILLIN THERAPY

J. Farrington,K. Riley,S. Olansky

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-194807000-00007

1948-07-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial

Jack Cuzick,Ivana Sestak,Michael Baum,Aman Buzdar,Anthony Howell,Mitch Dowsett,John F Forbes,ATAC/LATTE investigators

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70257-6

Abstract:Background: The Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of anastrozole (1 mg) with tamoxifen (20 mg), both given orally every day for 5 years, as adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. In this analysis, we assess the long-term outcomes after a median follow-up of 120 months. Methods: We used a proportional hazards model to assess the primary endpoint of disease-free survival, and the secondary endpoints of time to recurrence, time to distant recurrence, incidence of new contralateral breast cancer, overall survival, and death with or without recurrence in all randomised patients (anastrozole n=3125, tamoxifen n=3116) and hormone-receptor-positive patients (anastrozole n=2618, tamoxifen n=2598). After treatment completion, we continued to collect data on fractures and serious adverse events in a masked fashion (safety population: anastrozole n=3092, tamoxifen n=3094). This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN18233230. Findings: Patients were followed up for a median of 120 months (range 0-145); there were 24,522 woman-years of follow-up in the anastrozole group and 23,950 woman-years in the tamoxifen group. In the full study population, there were significant improvements in the anastrozole group compared with the tamoxifen group for disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0·91, 95% CI 0·83-0·99; p=0·04), time to recurrence (0·84, 0·75-0·93; p=0·001), and time to distant recurrence (0·87, 0·77-0·99; p=0·03). For hormone-receptor-positive patients, the results were also significantly in favour of the anastrozole group for disease-free survival (HR 0·86, 95% CI 0·78-0·95; p=0·003), time to recurrence (0·79, 0·70-0·89; p=0·0002), and time to distant recurrence (0·85, 0·73-0·98; p=0·02). In hormone-receptor-positive patients, absolute differences in time to recurrence between anastrozole and tamoxifen increased over time (2·7% at 5 years and 4·3% at 10 years) and recurrence rates remained significantly lower on anastrozole than tamoxifen after treatment completion (HR 0·81, 95% CI 0·67-0·98; p=0·03), although the carryover benefit was smaller after 8 years. There was weak evidence of fewer deaths after recurrence with anastrozole compared with tamoxifen treatment in the hormone-receptor-positive subgroup (HR 0·87, 95% CI 0·74-1·02; p=0·09), but there was little difference in overall mortality (0·95, 95% CI 0·84-1·06; p=0·4). Fractures were more frequent during active treatment in patients receiving anastrozole than those receiving tamoxifen (451 vs 351; OR 1·33, 95% CI 1·15-1·55; p<0·0001), but were similar in the post-treatment follow-up period (110 vs 112; OR 0·98, 95% CI 0·74-1·30; p=0·9). Treatment-related serious adverse events were less common in the anastrozole group than the tamoxifen group (223 anastrozole vs 369 tamoxifen; OR 0·57, 95% CI 0·48-0·69; p<0·0001), but were similar after treatment completion (66 vs 78; OR 0·84, 95% CI 0·60-1·19; p=0·3). No differences in non-breast cancer causes of death were apparent and the incidence of other cancers was similar between groups (425 vs 431) and continue to be higher with anastrozole for colorectal (66 vs 44) and lung cancer (51 vs 34), and lower for endometrial cancer (six vs 24), melanoma (eight vs 19), and ovarian cancer (17 vs 28). No new safety concerns were reported. Interpretation: These data confirm the long-term superior efficacy and safety of anastrozole over tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer.
Switching to anastrozole plus goserelin vs continued tamoxifen for adjuvant therapy of premenopausal early-stage breast cancer: preliminary results from a randomized trial.

Jian-Wei Li,Guang-Yu Liu,Ya-Jie Ji,Xia Yan,Da Pang,Ze-Fei Jiang,De-Dian Chen,Bin Zhang,Bing-He Xu,Zhi-Ming Shao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S183672

2019-01-01

Cancer Management and Research

Abstract:Purpose: To assess the efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life impact of switching adjuvant treatment in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer patients who are still premenopausal after 2-3 years of tamoxifen therapy to anastrozole plus goserelin as compared with continuing tamoxifen over a total period of 5 years. Patients and methods: Hormone receptor-positive, premenopausal, lymph node-positive, or tumor size >= 4 cm breast cancer patients who had received tamoxifen for 2-3 years were randomly assigned to continue tamoxifen treatment (TAM group) or switch to adjuvant anastrozole plus goserelin (ADD group) and continue treatment for another 2-3 years (total treatment duration 5 years). Endpoints evaluated were adverse events (AEs), changes in bone mineral density, quality of life, and disease-free survival-related events. Results: A total of 62 patients (33 in the ADD group and 29 in the TAM group) were evaluated. Grade 3-4 drug-related AEs occurred in five patients (15.2%) in the ADD group vs none in the TAM group. In the ADD group, arthralgias were the most common AEs (5/33 patients; 15.2%), and three patients in this group were discontinued because of AEs. Treatment was temporarily suspended due to AEs in three patients (9.1%) in the ADD group and one patient (3.4%) in the TAM group. Compared with continuing TAM therapy, switching to anastrozole plus goserelin did not result in any worsening of bone mineral density or quality of life. During a median follow-up of 34 months, five patients (15.2%) in the ADD group had disease-free survival events vs four patients (13.8%) in the TAM group. Conclusion: For early-stage breast cancer patients who remain premenopausal following 2-3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, switching to anastrozole plus goserelin therapy was safe with tolerable adverse effects. However, it did not show superior efficacy compared to remaining on tamoxifen treatment.
Focus on anastrozole and breast cancer

K Mokbel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1185/030079903125002397

Abstract:This commentary article provides an overview of recent clinical research trials involving anastrozole and its evolving role in the management of breast cancer. Anti-aromatase agents inhibit the cytochrome P-450 component of the aromatase enzyme complex responsible for the final step of estrogen biosynthesis in peripheral tissues which are the main source of estrogen in postmenopausal women. Anastrozole is a third-generation non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor. It has been shown to be superior to megestrol acetate, in terms of survival and adverse effects, as a second-line therapy in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)- and/or progesterone receptor (PgR)-positive advanced breast cancer. Phase III clinical trials have also demonstrated that anastrozole significantly prolongs the time to tumour progression compared with tamoxifen as a first-line therapy for ER- and/or PgR-positive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Furthermore, the preliminary results of the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone and in Combination (ATAC) study have shown that adjuvant anastrozole is superior to tamoxifen in terms of disease-free survival (DFS), non-musculoskeletal adverse effects and prevention of contralateral breast cancer in postmenopausal women with early, ER-positive breast cancer. Although longer follow-up is required to assess the long-term effects of anastrozole on bone mineral density, cognitive function and overall survival, the drug has been recently approved for adjuvant use in postmenopausal women with early, ER-positive breast cancer who are unable to tolerate tamoxifen or at an increased risk of developing thromboembolism or endometrial cancer. The potential role of anastrozole in the neoadjuvant setting, the management of DCIS, premenopausal breast cancer and breast cancer prevention is currently being investigated.
A comparison of letrozole and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer

Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 Collaborative Group,Beat Thürlimann,Aparna Keshaviah,Alan S Coates,Henning Mouridsen,Louis Mauriac,John F Forbes,Robert Paridaens,Monica Castiglione-Gertsch,Richard D Gelber,Manuela Rabaglio,Ian Smith,Andrew Wardley,Karen N Price,Aron Goldhirsch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa052258

2005-12-29

Abstract:Background: The aromatase inhibitor letrozole is a more effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer and more effective in the neoadjuvant setting than tamoxifen. We compared letrozole with tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for steroid-hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Methods: The Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 study is a randomized, phase 3, double-blind trial that compared five years of treatment with various adjuvant endocrine therapy regimens in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer: letrozole, letrozole followed by tamoxifen, tamoxifen, and tamoxifen followed by letrozole. This analysis compares the two groups assigned to receive letrozole initially with the two groups assigned to receive tamoxifen initially; events and follow-up in the sequential-treatment groups were included up to the time that treatments were switched. Results: A total of 8010 women with data that could be assessed were enrolled, 4003 in the letrozole group and 4007 in the tamoxifen group. After a median follow-up of 25.8 months, 351 events had occurred in the letrozole group and 428 events in the tamoxifen group, with five-year disease-free survival estimates of 84.0 percent and 81.4 percent, respectively. As compared with tamoxifen, letrozole significantly reduced the risk of an event ending a period of disease-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.70 to 0.93; P=0.003), especially the risk of distant recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.88; P=0.001). Thromboembolism, endometrial cancer, and vaginal bleeding were more common in the tamoxifen group. Women given letrozole had a higher incidence of skeletal and cardiac events and of hypercholesterolemia. Conclusions: In postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive breast cancer, adjuvant treatment with letrozole, as compared with tamoxifen, reduced the risk of recurrent disease, especially at distant sites. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004205.)
Use of letrozole after aromatase inhibitor-based therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer (NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

Eleftherios P Mamounas,Hanna Bandos,Barry C Lembersky,Jong-Hyeon Jeong,Charles E Geyer Jr,Priya Rastogi,Louis Fehrenbacher,Mark L Graham,Stephen K Chia,Adam M Brufsky,Janice M Walshe,Gamini S Soori,Shaker R Dakhil,Thomas E Seay,James L Wade 3rd,Edward C McCarron,Soonmyung Paik,Sandra M Swain,D Lawrence Wickerham,Norman Wolmark

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30621-1

Abstract:Background: The optimal duration of extended therapy with aromatase inhibitors in patients with postmenopausal breast cancer is unknown. In the NSABP B-42 study, we aimed to determine whether extended letrozole treatment improves disease-free survival after 5 years of aromatase inhibitor-based therapy in women with postmenopausal breast cancer. Methods: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was done in 158 centres in the USA, Canada, and Ireland. Postmenopausal women with stage I-IIIA hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, who were disease-free after about 5 years of treatment with an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 5 years of letrozole (2·5 mg orally per day) or placebo. Randomisation was stratified by pathological node status, previous tamoxifen use, and lowest bone mineral density T score in the lumbosacral spine, total hip, or femoral neck. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival, defined as time from randomisation to breast cancer recurrence, second primary malignancy, or death, and was analysed by intention to treat. To adjust for previous interim analyses, the two-sided statistical significance level for disease-free survival was set at 0·0418. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00382070, is active, and is no longer enrolling patients. Findings: Between Sept 28, 2006, and Jan 6, 2010, 3966 patients were randomly assigned to receive letrozole (n=1983) or placebo (n=1983). Follow-up information was available for 3903 patients for the analyses of disease-free survival. Median follow-up was 6·9 years (IQR 6·1-7·5). Letrozole treatment did not significantly improve disease-free survival (339 disease-free survival events were reported in the placebo group and 292 disease-free survival events were reported in the letrozole group; hazard ratio 0·85, 95% CI 0·73-0·999; p=0·048). 7-year disease-free survival estimate was 81·3% (95% CI 79·3-83·1) in the placebo group and 84·7% (82·9-86·4) in the letrozole group. The most common grade 3 adverse events were arthralgia (47 [2%] of 1933 patients in the placebo group vs 50 [3%] of 1941 patients in the letrozole group) and back pain (44 [2%] vs 38 [2%]). The most common grade 4 adverse event in the placebo group was thromboembolic event (eight [<1%]) and the most common grade 4 adverse events in the letrozole group were urinary tract infection, hypokalaemia, and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (four [<1%] each). Interpretation: After 5 years of aromatase inhibitor-based therapy, 5 years of letrozole therapy did not significantly prolong disease-free survival compared with placebo. Careful assessment of potential risks and benefits is required before recommending extended letrozole therapy to patients with early-stage breast cancer. Funding: National Cancer Institute, Korea Health Technology R&D Project, Novartis.
Responses to hypoxia of plaice, Pleuronectes platessa, and dab, Limanda limanda, in the south-east Kattegat: distribution and growth

J. Petersen,L. Pihl

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00005864

1995-07-01

Environmental Biology of Fishes

Abstract:
Abstract GS2-04: Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in pre-menopausal women with estrogen receptor positive early stage breast cancer treated with ovarian suppression: A patient level meta-analysis of 7,030 women in four randomised trials

Rosie Bradley,Jeremy Braybrooke,Richard Gray,Robert K Hills,Zulian Lui,Hongchao Pan,Richard Peto,Jonas Bergh,Sandra M Swain,Prudence Francis,Michael Gnant,Francesco Perrone,Meredith M Regan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs21-gs2-04

IF: 11.2

2022-02-15

Cancer Research

Abstract:Abstract Background: For women with early stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer, adjuvant treatment with tamoxifen reduces their 15-year risk of death from breast cancer by about one third. Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are even more effective than tamoxifen in post-menopausal women but, used alone, are ineffective in pre-menopausal women due to compensatory ovarian oestrogen production. Several trials have assessed whether, if administered with ovarian suppression, AIs may also be more effective than tamoxifen at preventing breast cancer recurrence in premenopausal women but trial results have been inconsistent. Methods: Individual patient data were available from four randomised controlled trials, including 7,030 pre-menopausal women with estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. All women received ovarian suppression or ablation and were randomised to receive either an AI or tamoxifen for 3 years (in ABCSG XII) or 5 years in other trials (SOFT, TEXT and HOBOE). Primary outcomes for the meta-analysis were time to invasive breast cancer recurrence (distant, loco-regional, or new contralateral breast primary) and breast cancer mortality. Log-rank analyses were used to estimate first-event rate ratios (RR) and their confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Overall, the annual rate of recurrence averaged 21% lower (RR 0.79, 95% 0.69-0.90, p=0.0005) for women allocated AI compared to tamoxifen. The main benefit from AI was seen in years 0-4 (RR 0.68, 99% CI 0.58-0.80), during the period when treatments differed, with no further benefit, or loss of benefit, in years 5-9 (RR 0.98, 99% 0.73-1.32), and as yet limited follow up data available beyond year 10. The 5-year absolute risk of breast cancer recurrence was 3.2% lower in the AI group than the tamoxifen group (6.9% vs 10.1%, p=0.0005). Although distant recurrence was reduced with AI (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.97, p=0.02), there was no difference in breast cancer mortality although longer follow up is needed to assess effects on mortality reliably. The proportional reduction in recurrence during the period when treatments differed did not vary by age, BMI, or by tumour size, tumour grade, histological subtype, or presence and absence of chemotherapy. In contrast to the findings of the meta-analysis of AI vs tamoxifen in postmenopausal women, AI appeared ineffective in N4+ disease (RR=0.49 in N0, RR=0.56 in N1-3, RR=1.03 in N4+; p for trend =0.0009). The only other apparent heterogeneity was between the four trial results (p=0.03), and between HER2-negative and positive disease (p=0.05), which may be chance findings given the borderline statistical significance. There were more bone fractures in women receiving AI (5.0% AI vs 3.8% Tam, p=0.02). Among these younger women, few non-breast cancer deaths occurred: 0.9% AI vs 0.7% Tam (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.75-2.25), and the incidence of endometrial cancer was low (0.2% AI vs 0.3% tamoxifen, p=0.14). Conclusion: Using an AI rather than tamoxifen, in premenopausal women receiving ovarian suppression, reduces the risk of breast cancer recurrence by about 20%. If the surprising lack of benefit in N4+ disease is a chance finding, then the absolute benefits will be larger for women at a higher absolute risk of recurrence. Citation Format: Rosie Bradley, Jeremy Braybrooke, Richard Gray, Robert K Hills, Zulian Lui, Hongchao Pan, Richard Peto, Jonas Bergh, Sandra M Swain, Prudence Francis, Michael Gnant, Francesco Perrone, Meredith M Regan. Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in pre-menopausal women with estrogen receptor positive early stage breast cancer treated with ovarian suppression: A patient level meta-analysis of 7,030 women in four randomised trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS2-04.

oncology
Abstract PS10-03: Impact of Baseline Oestradiol and Testosterone on the Preventive Effect of Anastrozole

Jack Cuzick,Kim Chu,Brian Keevil,Antony Howell,Bernardo Bonanni,Evans Gareth,Kaija Holli,Sibylle Loibl,Nicholas Zdenkowski,Steven Cummings,Mitch Dowsett

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs23-ps10-03

IF: 11.2

2024-05-02

Cancer Research

Abstract:Abstract It is well known that serum levels of oestradiol and testosterone, esp free hormone levels, influence the risk of developing breast cancer in postmenopausal women (Thomas et al 1997, Hankinson et al 1998, Kaaks et al 2005, Tin Tin et al 2021). However very little is known about how these hormone levels influence the effectiveness of aromatase inhibitors. In the IBIS-II Prevention Trial we compared anastrozole to placebo in 3864 women at high risk of breast cancer (Cuzick et al 2020). Of these women 3644 (94.3%) had a baseline blood sample. In those with a valid blood sample, 72 in the anastrozole arm and 142 in the placebo arm developed breast cancer (including DCIS) after 12.9 years of follow up (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.37–0.66 P< 0.0001). For each case two controls were selected, matched on age, treatment arm and follow up longer than the matching case. In these women oestradiol (E2), testosterone (Testo) and SHBG were measured by liquid chromatography – tandem mass spectroscopy, and E2/SHBG and Testo/SHBG ratios were computed to approximate free hormone levels, and analysed in quartiles. Hormone replacement therapy was not allowed during the trial, and women with use within 3 months prior to entry or outlier hormone values were excluded from these analyses. In the placebo arm higher levels of both of these ratios were associated with a higher breast cancer rate (OR per quartile 1.25 (1.04-1.59), P=0.018) for E2/SHBG and (OR per quartile 1.22 (1.02-1.47), P = 0.032) for Testo/SHBG), whereas no significant effect was seen in the anastrozole arm (OR = 1.05 (0.81-1.37), and 1.16 (0.90-1.49), resp) (Table). Neither treatment interaction was significant. Absolute numbers of cases were similar between the anastrozole and placebo arms in the lowest quartile of E2/SHBG (18 anastrozole, 22 placebo), but higher numbers were seen in the placebo arm for the other quartiles. Similar results were seen for testo/SHBG, and supportive, but weaker results were seen for these two hormones without an SHBG adjustment, SHBG and BMI at entry. Adjusting for other risk factors had no influence on these findings. Effect sizes were similar during the 5 year treatment period and thereafter. There were too few ER negative cases to compare results by receptor status. Vasomotor side effects were higher with increasing E2/SHBG levels in both arms, but no other hormone showed an effect, and no hormone level was significantly associated with gynaecologic or musculoskeletal side effects. As aromatase inhibitors effectively eliminate the production of oestradiol in postmenopausal women, these results suggest they may be more effective in postmenopausal women with high oestradiol or testosterone levels, and raise questions about their value in women in the lower quartile of serum levels for these hormones for prevention and possibly adjuvant treatment. Table: Risk of breast cancer by quartiles of the oestradiol/SHBG in ratio high risk women treated with anastrozole or placebo. Citation Format: Jack Cuzick, Kim Chu, Brian Keevil, Antony Howell, Bernardo Bonanni, Evans Gareth, Kaija Holli, Sibylle Loibl, Nicholas Zdenkowski, Steven Cummings, Mitch Dowsett. Impact of Baseline Oestradiol and Testosterone on the Preventive Effect of Anastrozole [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS10-03.

oncology
Effect of anastrozole on hormone levels in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer

I Kyvernitakis,U-S Albert,M Kalder,A-S Winarno,O Hars,P Hadji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2014.929105

Climacteric

Abstract:Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of anastrozole on serum hormone levels in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Methods: We prospectively determined serum levels of estradiol, testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS), sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) at screening, as well as after 12 and 24 months of treatment and studied the associations with markers of bone turnover and bone mineral density (BMD). Results: Altogether, a full set of hormone levels was available for 70 patients. Anastrozole treatment led to decreases of 92.1% for estradiol and 11.1% for LH over the observation period (p < 0.001). Conversely, FSH, DHEAS and testosterone concentrations increased by 5.9%, 33.3% and 50%, respectively (p < 0.001). SHBG levels remained stable during the 24 months of treatment (p = 0.355). There were modest associations between FSH, SHBG, CrossLaps and N-terminal propeptide of human procollagen type I (p < 0.05). Moreover, SHBG correlated positively with the BMD of femoral neck, total hip, total hip T-score, lumbar spine and the lumbar spine T-score, whereas FSH and estradiol correlated with the lumbar spine T-score (p < 0.05). Conclusions: During the 24 months of follow-up, treatment with anastrozole decreased the serum levels of estradiol and LH. Furthermore, we found notable increases of serum levels of FSH, DHEAS and testosterone in the first 12 months of treatment, stabilizing thereafter. Additionally, we were able to correlate hormone levels with markers of bone turnover and BMD for the first time in this regard.
Adjuvant hormone therapy for breast cancer: alternatives to tamoxifen

Abstract:(1) After surgical excision of hormone-receptor-positive non metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women, a meta-analysis of 55 trials has shown that adjuvant tamoxifen, 20 mg/day for 5 years, reduces the risk of relapse by 8% and the risk of death by 5% (absolute values). The benefit of treatment beyond 5 years remains to be established. (2) Preliminary four-year results from a double-blind randomised controlled trial comparing anastrozole with tamoxifen (ATAC trial) indicated an advantage for anastrozole in reducing the risk of relapse. There was no difference in survival rate. Women taking anastrozole experienced more sexual dysfunction and an increased risk of osteoporotic fractures, whereas tamoxifen was associated with an increased risk of thrombosis and endometrial cancer. The trial's methodology is controversial, however, and conclusions concerning the relative risk-benefit balances of these two drugs must await the full 5-year results. (3) A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of letrozole, prescribed after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen, was stopped early after a median follow-up of 2.4 years. When extrapolated to 4 years, the results suggest that letrozole reduced the risk of relapse (7%, compared to 13% with tamoxifen) but had no effect on survival. (4) A double-blind trial comparing tamoxifen with exemestane in 4742 women who had already received tamoxifen for two to three years showed a higher three-year disease-free survival rate with exemestane (91.5% versus 86.8%). Overall survival did not differ between the two groups. (5) Pending results of further clinical trials, tamoxifen remains the first-line adjuvant hormone therapy for most postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive non metastatic breast cancer.
Assessment of letrozole and tamoxifen alone and in sequence for postmenopausal women with steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the BIG 1-98 randomised clinical trial at 8·1 years median follow-up

Meredith M Regan,Patrick Neven,Anita Giobbie-Hurder,Aron Goldhirsch,Bent Ejlertsen,Louis Mauriac,John F Forbes,Ian Smith,István Láng,Andrew Wardley,Manuela Rabaglio,Karen N Price,Richard D Gelber,Alan S Coates,Beat Thürlimann,BIG 1-98 Collaborative Group,International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70270-4

Abstract:Background: Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer have persistent, long-term risk of breast-cancer recurrence and death. Therefore, trials assessing endocrine therapies for this patient population need extended follow-up. We present an update of efficacy outcomes in the Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 study at 8·1 years median follow-up. Methods: BIG 1-98 is a randomised, phase 3, double-blind trial of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer that compares 5 years of tamoxifen or letrozole monotherapy, or sequential treatment with 2 years of one of these drugs followed by 3 years of the other. Randomisation was done with permuted blocks, and stratified according to the two-arm or four-arm randomisation option, participating institution, and chemotherapy use. Patients, investigators, data managers, and medical reviewers were masked. The primary efficacy endpoint was disease-free survival (events were invasive breast cancer relapse, second primaries [contralateral breast and non-breast], or death without previous cancer event). Secondary endpoints were overall survival, distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI), and breast cancer-free interval (BCFI). The monotherapy comparison included patients randomly assigned to tamoxifen or letrozole for 5 years. In 2005, after a significant disease-free survival benefit was reported for letrozole as compared with tamoxifen, a protocol amendment facilitated the crossover to letrozole of patients who were still receiving tamoxifen alone; Cox models and Kaplan-Meier estimates with inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) are used to account for selective crossover to letrozole of patients (n=619) in the tamoxifen arm. Comparison of sequential treatments to letrozole monotherapy included patients enrolled and randomly assigned to letrozole for 5 years, letrozole for 2 years followed by tamoxifen for 3 years, or tamoxifen for 2 years followed by letrozole for 3 years. Treatment has ended for all patients and detailed safety results for adverse events that occurred during the 5 years of treatment have been reported elsewhere. Follow-up is continuing for those enrolled in the four-arm option. BIG 1-98 is registered at clinicaltrials.govNCT00004205. Findings: 8010 patients were included in the trial, with a median follow-up of 8·1 years (range 0-12·4). 2459 were randomly assigned to monotherapy with tamoxifen for 5 years and 2463 to monotherapy with letrozole for 5 years. In the four-arm option of the trial, 1546 were randomly assigned to letrozole for 5 years, 1548 to tamoxifen for 5 years, 1540 to letrozole for 2 years followed by tamoxifen for 3 years, and 1548 to tamoxifen for 2 years followed by letrozole for 3 years. At a median follow-up of 8·7 years from randomisation (range 0-12·4), letrozole monotherapy was significantly better than tamoxifen, whether by IPCW or intention-to-treat analysis (IPCW disease-free survival HR 0·82 [95% CI 0·74-0·92], overall survival HR 0·79 [0·69-0·90], DRFI HR 0·79 [0·68-0·92], BCFI HR 0·80 [0·70-0·92]; intention-to-treat disease-free survival HR 0·86 [0·78-0·96], overall survival HR 0·87 [0·77-0·999], DRFI HR 0·86 [0·74-0·998], BCFI HR 0·86 [0·76-0·98]). At a median follow-up of 8·0 years from randomisation (range 0-11·2) for the comparison of the sequential groups with letrozole monotherapy, there were no statistically significant differences in any of the four endpoints for either sequence. 8-year intention-to-treat estimates (each with SE ≤1·1%) for letrozole monotherapy, letrozole followed by tamoxifen, and tamoxifen followed by letrozole were 78·6%, 77·8%, 77·3% for disease-free survival; 87·5%, 87·7%, 85·9% for overall survival; 89·9%, 88·7%, 88·1% for DRFI; and 86·1%, 85·3%, 84·3% for BCFI. Interpretation: For postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer, a reduction in breast cancer recurrence and mortality is obtained by letrozole monotherapy when compared with tamoxifen montherapy. Sequential treatments involving tamoxifen and letrozole do not improve outcome compared with letrozole monotherapy, but might be useful strategies when considering an individual patient's risk of recurrence and treatment tolerability. Funding: Novartis, United States National Cancer Institute, International Breast Cancer Study Group.
Hands On/Hands Off: Why Health Care Professionals Depend on Families but Keep Them at Arm's Length

C. Levine,C. Zuckerman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2000.tb00311.x

2000-03-01

Abstract:In the theater the fictional Dr. Kelekian’s relief that he does not have to talk to family members about his patient’s cancer treatment draws uneasy laughter from the audience. Doctors, patients, and family members alike recognize the situation, even if hearing it so baldly expressed discomfits them. Why do physicians and other health care professionals, including lawyers and bioethicists, so often view families as “trouble”? And why do families so often see medical professionals as uncaring and uncommunicative? Presumably everyone wants the same goal—recovery or the best possible outcome for the patient. And yet trouble clearly exists. We do not see the problem as one of “dysfunctional families” or “callous doctors,” although there are undoubtedly many of each.
Patient-reported outcomes with adjuvant exemestane versus tamoxifen in premenopausal women with early breast cancer undergoing ovarian suppression (TEXT and SOFT): a combined analysis of two phase 3 randomised trials

Jürg Bernhard,Weixiu Luo,Karin Ribi,Marco Colleoni,Harold J Burstein,Carlo Tondini,Graziella Pinotti,Simon Spazzapan,Thomas Ruhstaller,Fabio Puglisi,Lorenzo Pavesi,Vani Parmar,Meredith M Regan,Olivia Pagani,Gini F Fleming,Prudence A Francis,Karen N Price,Alan S Coates,Richard D Gelber,Aron Goldhirsch,Barbara A Walley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00049-2

Abstract:Background: The combined efficacy analysis of the TEXT and SOFT trials showed a significant disease-free survival benefit with exemestane plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) compared with tamoxifen plus OFS. We present patient-reported outcomes from these trials. Methods: Between Nov 7, 2003, and April 7, 2011, 4717 premenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer were enrolled in TEXT or SOFT to receive unmasked adjuvant treatment with 5 years of exemestane plus OFS or tamoxifen plus OFS. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue triptorelin, bilateral oophorectomy, or bilateral ovarian irradiation were used to achieve OFS. Chemotherapy use was optional. Randomisation with permuted blocks was done with the International Breast Cancer Study Group's internet-based system and was stratified by chemotherapy use and status of lymph nodes. Patients completed a quality of life (QoL) form comprising several global and symptom indicators at baseline, every 6 months for 24 months, and then every year during years 3 to 6. Differences in the change of QoL from baseline between the two treatments were tested at 6 months, 24 months, and 60 months with mixed-models for repeated measures for each trial with and without chemotherapy and overall. The analysis was by intention to treat. At the time of analysis, the median follow-up was 5·7 years (IQR 3·7-6·9); treatment and follow-up of patients continue. The trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, as NCT00066703 (TEXT) and NCT00066690 (SOFT). Findings: Patients on tamoxifen plus OFS were more affected by hot flushes and sweats over 5 years than were those on exemestane plus OFS, although these symptoms improved. Patients on exemestane plus OFS reported more vaginal dryness, greater loss of sexual interest, and difficulties becoming aroused than did patients on tamoxifen plus OFS; these differences persisted over time. An increase in bone or joint pain was more pronounced, particularly in the short term, in patients on exemestane plus OFS than patients on tamoxifen plus OFS. Changes in global QoL indicators from baseline were small and similar between treatments over the 5 years. Interpretation: Overall, from a QoL perspective, there is no strong indication to favour either exemestane plus OFS or tamoxifen plus OFS. The distinct effects of the two treatments on the burden of endocrine symptoms need to be addressed with patients individually. Funding: Pfizer, International Breast Cancer Study Group, and US National Cancer Institute.
Efficacy and Safety of Initial 5 Years of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Hao Liao,Wendi Pei,Jianxin Zhong,Bin Shao,Xiaoran Liu,Yaxin Liu,Jiayang Zhang,Hope S. Rugo,Huiping Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.886954

IF: 5.6

2022-05-30

Frontiers in Pharmacology

Abstract:Purpose: To identify the optimal initial 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal early breast cancer (EBC) patients. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE to obtain relevant studies published between January 2000 and January 2022. Randomized clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of initial 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy were included. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival and overall survival and the secondary outcome was severe adverse effects (SAEs). A Bayesian network meta-analysis was carried out to indirectly compare all regimens and the value of surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to obtain rankings. Results: Eleven studies with 49,987 subjects were included. For DFS, exemestane (EXE) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.87–0.96], anastrozole (ANA) (0.94, 0.90–0.97), letrozole (LET) (0.93, 0.89–0.97), tamoxifen (TAM) followed by EXE (0.91, 0.87–0.96), and TAM followed by ANA (0.92, 0.87–0.98) were more favorable than TAM, with TAM followed by EXE ranking as the first of SUCRA. For OS, only TAM followed by ANA showed significant superiority than TAM (HR 0.91, 95%CI 0.86–0.97) and ranked as the first of SUCRA. For SAEs, EXE (HR 1.72, 95%CI 1.04–2.98), ANA (1.58, 1.03–2.43), and LET (1.63, 1.02–2.57) showed greater associations with bone fracture than TAM. However, no significant difference in the incidences of cardiac events, thromboembolic events, and cerebrovascular events was found among all comparisons. Conclusion: The sequential use of aromatase inhibitors, which has the best curative effects and relatively mild side effects, may be the optimal treatment mode for hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal EBC patients. In addition, the three kinds of aromatase inhibitors achieved roughly equal efficacy, but caused different types of SAEs. Systematic Review Registration: [website], identifier [registration number].

pharmacology & pharmacy
Five years of letrozole compared with tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: update of study BIG 1-98

Alan S Coates,Aparna Keshaviah,Beat Thürlimann,Henning Mouridsen,Louis Mauriac,John F Forbes,Robert Paridaens,Monica Castiglione-Gertsch,Richard D Gelber,Marco Colleoni,István Láng,Lucia Del Mastro,Ian Smith,Jacquie Chirgwin,Jean-Marie Nogaret,Tadeusz Pienkowski,Andrew Wardley,Erik H Jakobsen,Karen N Price,Aron Goldhirsch

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.08.8617

2007-02-10

Abstract:Purpose: Previous analyses of the Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 four-arm study compared initial therapy with letrozole or tamoxifen including patients randomly assigned to sequential treatment whose information was censored at the time of therapy change. Because this presentation may unduly reflect early events, the present analysis is limited to patients randomly assigned to the continuous therapy arms and includes protocol-defined updated results. Patients and methods: Four thousand nine hundred twenty-two of the 8,028 postmenopausal women with receptor-positive early breast cancer randomly assigned (double-blind) to the BIG 1-98 trial were assigned to 5 years of continuous adjuvant therapy with either letrozole or tamoxifen; the remainder of women were assigned to receive the agents in sequence. Disease-free survival (DFS) was the primary end point. Results: At a median follow-up time of 51 months, we observed 352 DFS events among 2,463 women receiving letrozole and 418 events among 2,459 women receiving tamoxifen. This reflected an 18% reduction in the risk of an event (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.95; P = .007). No predefined subsets showed differential benefit. Adverse events were similar to previous reports. Patients on tamoxifen experienced more thromboembolic events, endometrial pathology, hot flashes, night sweats, and vaginal bleeding. Patients on letrozole experienced more bone fractures, arthralgia, low-grade hypercholesterolemia, and cardiovascular events other than ischemia and cardiac failure. Conclusion: The present updated analysis, which was limited to patients on monotherapy arms in BIG 1-98, yields results similar to those from the previous primary analysis but more directly comparable with results from other trials of continuous therapy using a single endocrine agent.
The role of the addition of ovarian suppression to tamoxifen in young women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer who remain premenopausal or regain menstruation after chemotherapy (ASTRRA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and progress

Hyun-Ah Kim,Sei Hyun Ahn,Seok Jin Nam,Seho Park,Jungsil Ro,Seock-Ah Im,Yong Sik Jung,Jung Han Yoon,Min Hee Hur,Yoon Ji Choi,Soo-Jung Lee,Joon Jeong,Se-Heon Cho,Sung Yong Kim,Min Hyuk Lee,Lee Su Kim,Byung-In Moon,Tae Hyun Kim,Chanheun Park,Sei Joong Kim,Sung Hoo Jung,Heungkyu Park,Geum Hee Gwak,Sun Hee Kang,Jong Gin Kim,Jeryong Kim,Su Yun Choi,Cheol-Wan Lim,Doyil Kim,Youngbum Yoo,Young-Jin Song,Yoon-Jung Kang,Sang Seol Jung,Hyuk Jai Shin,Kwan Ju Lee,Se-Hwan Han,Eun Sook Lee,Wonshik Han,Hee-Jung Kim,Woo Chul Noh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2354-6

IF: 4.638

2016-05-19

BMC Cancer

Abstract:BackgroundOvarian function suppression (OFS) has been shown to be effective as adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. However, it is currently unclear if addition of OFS to standard tamoxifen therapy after completion of adjuvant chemotherapy results in a survival benefit. In 2008, the Korean Breast Cancer Society Study Group initiated the ASTRRA randomized phase III trial to evaluate the efficacy of OFS in addition to standard tamoxifen treatment in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer patients who remain or regain premenopausal status after chemotherapy.MethodsPremenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer treated with definitive surgery were enrolled after completion of neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Ovarian function was assessed at the time of enrollment and every 6 months for 2 years by follicular-stimulating hormone levels and bleeding history. If ovarian function was confirmed as premenopausal status, the patient was randomized to receive 2 years of goserelin plus 5 years of tamoxifen treatment or 5 years of tamoxifen alone. The primary end point will be the comparison of the 5-year disease-free survival rates between the OFS and tamoxifen alone groups. Patient recruitment was finished on March 2014 with the inclusion of a total of 1483 patients. The interim analysis will be performed at the time of the observation of the 187th event.DiscussionThis study will provide evidence of the benefit of OFS plus tamoxifen compared with tamoxifen only in premenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer treated with chemotherapy.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00912548. Registered May 31 2009. Korean Breast Cancer Society Study Group Register KBCSG005. Registered October 26 2009.

oncology
Anastrozole dose escalation for optimal estrogen suppression in postmenopausal early-stage breast cancer: A prospective trial

Tufia C. Haddad,Vera J. Suman,Karthik V. Giridhar,Kostandinos Sideras,Donald W. Northfelt,Brenda J. Ernst,Ciara C. O'Sullivan,Ravinder J. Singh,Zeruesenay Desta,Prema P. Peethambaram,Timothy J. Hobday,Saranya Chumsri,Roberto A. Leon-Ferre,Kathryn J. Ruddy,Siddhartha Yadav,Jodi L. Taraba,Barbara Goodnature,Matthew P. Goetz,Liewei Wang,James N. Ingle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-0341

IF: 13.801

2024-05-17

Clinical Cancer Research

Abstract:Background: We previously reported that postmenopausal women with ER+ breast cancer (BC) receiving adjuvant anastrozole 1 mg/day (ANA1) with estrone (E1) ≥1.3 pg/mL and estradiol (E2) ≥0.5 (inadequate estrogen suppression [IES]) had a 3.0-fold increased risk of a BC event. The objective of this study was to determine if increasing anastrozole to 10 mg/day (ANA10) could result in adequate estrogen suppression (AES: E1 <1.3 pg/mL and/or E2 <0.5) among those with IES on ANA1. Methods: Postmenopausal women with ER+ BC planning to receive adjuvant ANA1 were eligible. E1 and E2 were assessed pre- and post-8-10 weeks of ANA1. Those with IES were switched to 8-10 week cycles of ANA10 followed by letrozole 2.5 mg/day. E1 and E2 were assessed after each cycle. Anastrozole concentrations were measured post-ANA1 and post-ANA10. Primary analyses included patients who documented taking at least 80% of planned treatment (adherent cohort). Results: 132 (84.6%) of 156 eligible patients were ANA1-adherent. IES occurred in 40 (30.3%) adherent patients. 25 (78.1%) of 32 patients who began ANA10 were adherent, and AES was achieved in 19 (76.0%; 90%CI: 58.1-89.0%) patients. Anastrozole concentrations post-ANA1 and post-ANA10 did not differ by estrogen suppression status among adherent patients. AES was maintained/attained in 21 (91.3%) of 23 letrozole-adherent patients. Conclusions: Approximately 30% of ANA1-adherent patients had IES. Among those who switched to ANA10 and were adherent, 76% had AES. Further studies are required to validate emerging data that ANA1 results in IES for some patients and to determine the clinical benefit of switching to ANA10 or an alternative AI.

oncology
On the Interplay between Content Popularity and Performance in P2P Systems

E. D. S. E. Silva,R. M. Leão,D. Menasché,Antonio A. Rocha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40196-1_2

2013-08-27

Abstract:
Aromatase inhibition 2013: clinical state of the art and questions that remain to be solved

Per Eystein Lønning,Hans Petter Eikesdal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-13-0099

2013-06-24

Abstract:Following their successful implementation for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, the 'third-generation' aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane) have now become standard adjuvant endocrine treatment for postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. These drugs are characterized by potent aromatase inhibition, causing >98% inhibition of estrogen synthesis in vivo. A recent meta-analysis found no difference in anti-tumor efficacy between these three compounds. As of today, aromatase inhibitor monotherapy and sequential treatment using tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor for a total of 5 years are considered equipotent treatment options. However, current trials are addressing the potential benefit of extending treatment duration beyond 5 years. Regarding side effects, aromatase inhibitors are not found associated with enhanced risk of cardiovascular disease, and enhanced bone loss is prevented by adding bisphosphonates in concert for those at danger of developing osteoporosis. However, arthralgia and carpal tunnel syndrome preclude drug administration among a few patients. While recent findings have questioned the use of aromatase inhibitors among overweight and, in particular, obese patients, this problem seems to focus on premenopausal patients treated with an aromatase inhibitor and an LH-RH analog in concert, questioning the efficacy of LH-RH analogs rather than aromatase inhibitors among overweight patients. Finally, recent findings revealing a benefit from adding the mTOR inhibitor everolimus to endocrine treatment indicate targeted therapy against defined growth factor pathways to be a way forward, by reversing acquired resistance to endocrine therapy.
Adjuvant endocrine monotherapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer patients with hormone-receptor positive: a systemic review and network meta-analysis

Zhu Yu,Xiaojing Guo,Yicheng Jiang,Lei Teng,Jinwu Luo,Pengfei Wang,Yunsheng Liang,Haitian Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-017-0794-8

2017-07-28

Breast Cancer

Abstract:BackgroundIn patients with hormone receptor-positive postmenopausal of early stage breast cancer, adjuvant endocrine monotherapies include letrozole, anastrozole, exemestane, toremifene and tamoxifen. But the optimum regimen remains controversial.MethodsPubMed, Cochrane Database and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically reviewed of abstract for randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy of tamoxifen, letrozole, exemestane, anastrozle and toremifene for postmenopausal patients with hormone-receptor positive (HR+), who have not received prior therapy for early stage breast cancer. The outcomes were measured by disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). We evaluated relative hazard ratios (HRs) for death of different therapies by combination hazard ratios for death of included trials. The SUCRA values were used to evaluate the rankings of efficacy for these monotherapies.ResultsA total of fourteen studies including 19,517 patients in our research were absorbed and estimated. The superiority of efficacy for DFS were 5-year letrozole and 10-year tamoxifen (SUCRA values 0.743/0.657) in all comparisons. A more efficient SUCRA values for OS were 5-year Exemestane, 5-year letrozole and 10-year tamoxifen (0.756/0.677/0.669).ConclusionsClinically important differences exist between commonly prescribed different adjuvant endocrine monotherapy regimens for both efficacy and acceptability in favor of exemestane and letrozole. 10-year tamoxifen for early breast cancer patients is noninferior to 5-year anastrozle, and might be the best choice where aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are not easy to acquire.

oncology,obstetrics & gynecology

UNTOWARD REACTIONS AND CUTANEOUS TESTING IN PENICILLIN THERAPY

Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen as adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: 10-year analysis of the ATAC trial

Switching to anastrozole plus goserelin vs continued tamoxifen for adjuvant therapy of premenopausal early-stage breast cancer: preliminary results from a randomized trial.

Focus on anastrozole and breast cancer

A comparison of letrozole and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer

Use of letrozole after aromatase inhibitor-based therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer (NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

Responses to hypoxia of plaice, Pleuronectes platessa, and dab, Limanda limanda, in the south-east Kattegat: distribution and growth

Abstract GS2-04: Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in pre-menopausal women with estrogen receptor positive early stage breast cancer treated with ovarian suppression: A patient level meta-analysis of 7,030 women in four randomised trials

Abstract PS10-03: Impact of Baseline Oestradiol and Testosterone on the Preventive Effect of Anastrozole

Effect of anastrozole on hormone levels in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer

Adjuvant hormone therapy for breast cancer: alternatives to tamoxifen

Assessment of letrozole and tamoxifen alone and in sequence for postmenopausal women with steroid hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: the BIG 1-98 randomised clinical trial at 8·1 years median follow-up

Hands On/Hands Off: Why Health Care Professionals Depend on Families but Keep Them at Arm's Length

Patient-reported outcomes with adjuvant exemestane versus tamoxifen in premenopausal women with early breast cancer undergoing ovarian suppression (TEXT and SOFT): a combined analysis of two phase 3 randomised trials

Efficacy and Safety of Initial 5 Years of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Five years of letrozole compared with tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with endocrine-responsive early breast cancer: update of study BIG 1-98

The role of the addition of ovarian suppression to tamoxifen in young women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer who remain premenopausal or regain menstruation after chemotherapy (ASTRRA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial and progress

Anastrozole dose escalation for optimal estrogen suppression in postmenopausal early-stage breast cancer: A prospective trial

On the Interplay between Content Popularity and Performance in P2P Systems

Aromatase inhibition 2013: clinical state of the art and questions that remain to be solved

Adjuvant endocrine monotherapy for postmenopausal early breast cancer patients with hormone-receptor positive: a systemic review and network meta-analysis