A comparison of role‐related physical fitness between British Army trainees and trained soldiers
Carla Rue,Sarah Needham‐Beck,Tessa Maroni,Andrew Siddall,Kimberly Ashdown,Ben Lee,Faye Walker,Joshua Osofa,Julianne Doherty,Christopher Vine,Sophie Wardle,Julie Greeves,Paul Saunders,Anne Fieldhouse,Sam Blacker,Stephen Myers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsc.12227
2024-12-04
European Journal of Sport Science
Abstract:British Army basic training (BT) and initial trade training (ITT) enable personnel to develop role‐related physical capability to perform in‐service job‐roles. The study aimed to compare physical performance of trainees (completing ITT) and trained soldiers, on a series of gym‐based fitness tests and representative military tasks. A total of 316 British Army personnel [68 trainees (63 men: 22 ± 3 years, 71.6 ± 8.4 kg and 1.74 ± 0.07 m) and 248 trained soldiers (225 men: 27 ± 6 years, 78.7 ± 12.7 kg and 1.76 ± 0.08 m)] completed two sessions. Session 1; body mass, stature, age and gym‐based tests (2 km run, broad jump, seated medicine ball throw, hex bar deadlift, 100 m shuttle sprints, pull‐ups and mid‐thigh pull). Session 2; representative military tasks (loaded carriage [stage 1, 4 km, 35–40 kg and 4.8 km h−1 fixed pace and stage 2, 2 km, 20–25 kg and individual best‐effort speed], tactical movement, casualty drag, stretcher carry, vertical lift, repeated carry and incremental lift). Independent sample t‐tests were employed to examine group differences. Compared to trainees, trained soldiers were older (p
sport sciences