Fever as a mechanism of resistance.

I. L. Bennett,A. Nicastri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.24.1.16-34.1960

1960-03-01

Bacteriological Reviews

Abstract:This teleological pronouncement by Thomas Sydenham in the seventeenth century was a definite enough expression of his opinion of fever as a mechanism of resistance (1). It was supported by no direct evidence at the time and, in large measure, it remains unsupported. That the febrile response to infectious disease is somehow beneficial has long been one of the tacit assumptions of medicine. As so often happens to traditional beliefs about commonplace natural phenomena, the view that fever is a staunch ally of the patient and his physician in the battle against microbial disease has achieved the status of a dogma. Thus insulated against serious challenge or critical evaluation, it is easily overlooked as a problem meriting scientific scrutiny. Consequently, it is a subject considered less and less in the laboratory of the investigator, and more and more in the realm of the turner of neat phrases and composer of aphorisms. For example, Dr. Alan K. Done published recently an excellent article (2) in which he counseled his fellow pediatricians to employ moderation in prescribing antipyretic drugs. He based this advice on strong grounds other than interference with body defences but also quoted the following apt summary by the late Dr. Eugene Dubois: