Abstract:OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stent placement after percutaneous recanalization of superior vena cava (SVC) stenosis in maintenance hemodialysis patients. METHODS Adult maintenance hemodialysis patients hospitalized at a university-affiliated tertiary hospital due to SVC stenosis from January 2016 to June 2023 were prospectively included. The efficacy and safety of percutaneous blunt/sharp SVC recanalization combined with SVC stent placement were observed. The patients' demographic information and laboratory examination data, stent placement success rate, surgery-related complications, and long-term vascular access patency rate were also recorded and analyzed. The study was approved by the institutional ethics committee (2015-201) and registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn (registry number: ChiCTR-ONN-16007790). RESULTS A total of 58 patients were included in the study with an average age of 54.79±13.42 years. Percutaneous SVC recanalization was successful in 53 cases, with a success rate of 91.38%, including 37 cases of traditional recanalization and 16 cases of sharp recanalization. Among 53 hemodialysis patients who underwent SVC recanalization, 14 patients successfully received covered stents and 38 patients received bare metal stents, achieving a stent placement success rate of 98.1%. One patient encountered stent displacement into the heart immediately after implantation, causing intra-operative cardiac tamponade, who was successfully rescued by thoracotomy. Fifty-two patients were followed-up for median period of 26 months (cuffed catheter: 25 patients, arteriovenous fistula [AVF]: 27 patients). The overall 2-year vascular access patency rate was 33.2% (cuffed catheter: 22.2%, AVF: 41.7%, p=0.414). There was no statistically significant difference in the 2-year vascular access patency rate between the traditional recanalization group and the sharp recanalization group (34.1% vs 31.1%, p=0.731) and between bare metal stent group and covered stent group (38.1% vs 21.4%, p=0.248). CONCLUSION Percutaneous SVC recanalization with stent placement is an effective treatment strategy that can provide viable vascular access for maintenance hemodialysis patients with SVC stenosis. Cautions should be paid to potential life-threatening complications such as stent displacement and cardiac tamponade. CLINICAL IMPACT Superior vena cava (SVC) stenosis is a common central venous occlusive lesion in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Whether stent should be implanted simultaneously following SVC recanalization is still lacking research. This pilot cohort study suggested that percutaneous SVC recanalization with stent placement was an effective treatment strategy which provides satisfactory vascular access for hemodialysis. We further found that SVC sharp recanalization with subsequent stent implantation was a feasible treatment, with the 2-year vascular access patency comparable to the traditional SVC recanalization group. This study also highlighted endovascular SVC recanalization should be performed with caution, and appropriate balloon sizes should be selected to avoid SVC rupture or stent displacement.

CT-Guided Superior Vena Cava Puncture: A Solution to Re-Establishing Access in Haemodialysis-Related Central Venous Occlusion Refractory to Conventional Endovascular Techniques

Central venoplasty followed by 'double guidewire railroad technique' as a bailout strategy in difficult tunnelled dialysis catheter insertion

CT guided sharp recanalization to restore dialysis access in patients with central venous obstruction: A single centre experience and review of alternative techniques

Endovascular intervention for central venous stenosis in hemodialysis patients: A single-center experience

Ultrasound guided percutaneous sharp recanalization for restoring patency from peripheral chronic total occlusions of hemodialysis accesses

Vascular access challenges in hemodialysis patients with superior vena cava syndrome

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty is safe and feasible for reinsertion of tunneled cuffed catheters in the right internal jugular vein

Long-segment central venous occlusion in a hemodialysis patient treated by segmented sharp recanalization strategy: A case report

Stent Placement After Percutaneous Recanalization of Superior Vena Cava Stenosis in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

Assessment of dysfunctional tunneled hemodialysis catheters and outcome of endovascular salvage techniques: a simple solution to a complex problem

The efficacy and safety of blunt impingement followed by a sharp recanalization technique in hemodialysis patients with refractory central vein occlusion: a single-center experience

Successful management of fatal cardiac tamponade resulting from intravascular intervention for central vein occlusion in hemodialysis patients: A case report

[Complications Related to Permanent Deep Venous Catheterization Using Dual Lumen Hemodialysis Catheter].

Clinical study on placement of indwelling hemodialysis catheter through stenotic or occluded central vein

End‐stage renal disease in a critical patient with superior vena cava syndrome with central vein catheters inserted via the superficial femoral vein: A case study

Solutions to Stuck Tunneled Cuffed Catheters in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis

Efficacy and safety of recanalization with transseptal needle for chronic total occlusion of the brachiocephalic vein in hemodialysis patients

"Wire kissing technique" and "externalization and pull-through technique" for treating chronic total occlusion in hemodialysis vascular access: A case report

A haemodialysis catheter misplaced due to central venous stenosis: A case report

Percutaneous reconstruction of chronic total occlusion of brachiocephalic vein using transseptal needle in dialysis-dependent patient

Popliteal venous access for renal replacement therapy in a critically ill patient with central access failure