Retrospective cohort analysis of current trends in the surgical management of congenital diaphragmatic eventration in children.
Khalid Alzahrani,Lymeymey Heng,Naziha Khen-Dunlop,Nicoleta Panait,Erik Hervieux,Lucie Grynberg,Olivier Abbo,Frederic Hameury,Frederic Lavrand,Olivier Maillet,Aurore Haffreingue,Anne Lehn,Stephan De Napoli Cocci,Edouard Habonimana,Jean-Luc Michel,Montalva Louise,Quentin Ballouhey,Arnaud Fotso Kamdem,Jean-Francois Lecompte,Antoine Line,Anna Poupalou,Pierre Meignan,Loren Deslandes,Guillaume Podevin,Francoise Schmitt
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.15.24302855
2024-08-06
Abstract:Aim: To compare the different surgical approaches for treating congenital diaphragmatic eventration (CDE) in children.
Methods: Retrospective data analysis of a multicentric cohort of pediatric patients operated on for CDE between 2010 and 2021, with comparison of the different surgical approaches and their outcomes.
Results: 112 patients, aged 12 [5 to 21] months, were operated on for CDE. Diaphragmatic plication was performed using thoracoscopy or RATS in 69 (62%) cases, postero-lateral thoracotomy (PLT) in 15 (13%), and using an abdominal approach in 28 (25%). Relief of symptoms was obtained in 88% of the cases and improvement in the diaphragmatic level in 90%. We recorded 31 postoperative complications (28%) and eight recurrences (7%). Compared to other approaches, PLT multiplied the duration of intravenous analgesia by three (96 vs 36h, p<0.0001) and the length of hospital stay by two (8 vs 4d, p=0.002). RATS provided more perioperative hepatic injuries and equivalent short-term results than thoracoscopy, but all five patients remained symptomatic and two of them experienced chest wall deformities.
Conclusion: Diaphragmatic plication via a minimally invasive thoracic approach may be the best treatment option for cases of symptomatic CDE. Further is required to confirm that RATS is, at least, not inferior to thoracoscopy.
ClinicalTrial , 2021-04-28 ;
Pediatrics