Abstract:Kinetic Poppe plots for small retained compounds were calculated in HPLC (using pure acetonitrile) and SFC (using pure carbon dioxide) for columns having twenty one different lengths (between 3 cm and 30 m), operated under strict adiabatic conditions (no heat exchange was allowed between the column and the external environment), with a constant pressure drop of 200 bar. The outlet pressures were set at 1 and 160 bar in HPLC and SFC, respectively. The eluent inlet temperature was set at 312 K. The hold-up time t0 and the apparent column efficiency <N> were calculated by taking into account the longitudinal variations of the eluent pressure, its temperature, density, viscosity, heat capacity, thermal expansion coefficient, equilibrium constant, and diffusion coefficient along the column length. Three different classes of stationary phase were considered: fully porous particles and core-shell particles of different diameter and structure, and silica monolithic columns of the second generation. The reduced plate heights of these stationary phases were taken from experimental data obtained with liquid eluents (acetonitrile/water mixtures). The columns were assumed to be radially homogeneous. The Henry's constant of the compound was fixed at Ka=2.0 at the column inlet. The results demonstrate the potential advantage of using sub-3 μm core-shell particles for fast analysis in both LC and SFC, regardless of the intra-particle diffusivity through the stationary phase. In RPLC conditions, the contribution of surface diffusion to intra-particle diffusivity is important and the 4.6 μm core-shell particles can perform as well as sub-2 μm fully porous particles and silica monolithic columns of the second generation. In the absence of surface diffusion or for localized adsorption onto the stationary phase, sub-2 μm particles and silica monolithic column of the second generation outperform the 4.6 μm core-shell particles because the solid-liquid mass transfer resistance controls the column efficiency at high speeds. Eventually, for the same stationary phase and speed of analysis, SFC methods using pure CO2 may provide at least a twice column efficiency than LC methods using pure acetonitrile. For a constant pressure drop and resolution power, SFC methods may generate four times faster analyses than LC methods. Ultimately, a standard commercial 4.6mm × 50mm long column packed with 2.6 μm core-shell particles, operated with an inlet flow rate of 25 mL/min in fast SFC (200 bar back pressure, 40 °C) may provide a hold-up time of about 1s requiring data acquisition at a frequency of 400 Hz, with a variance of 0.35 μL(2). This performance will require the use of new, ultra-low dispersion SFC system.

Characterization and classification of stationary phases in HPLC and SFC – a review

An improved classification of stationary phases for ultra-high performance supercritical fluid chromatography

Advances In Chiral Separations By Supercritical Fluid Chromatography

Application of Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy in Bioseparation Studies: Visual Characterization of Protein Adsorption Behaviors

The Study of the Submicroparticle Packed Column

A comparison of chiral separations by supercritical fluid chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography

Current trends in supercritical fluid chromatography

Maximizing kinetic performance in supercritical fluid chromatography using state-of-the-art instruments

Potential and limitations of on-line comprehensive reversed phase liquid chromatography×supercritical fluid chromatography for the separation of neutral compounds: An approach to separate an aqueous extract of bio-oil

Comprehensive Review on Chiral Stationary Phases in Single-Column Simultaneous Chiral–Achiral HPLC Separation Methods

Development of an achiral supercritical fluid chromatography method with ultraviolet absorbance and mass spectrometric detection for impurity profiling of drug candidates. Part I: Optimization of mobile phase composition

Physicochemical Principles of Extraction with Supercritical Gases

Synthesis and evaluation of aromatic stationary phases based on linear solvation energy relationship model for expanded application in supercritical fluid chromatography

Supercritical Fluid Chromatography in Bioanalysis–A Review

Recent advances in chiral liquid chromatography stationary phases for pharmaceutical analysis

Generic chiral method development in supercritical fluid chromatography and ultra-performance supercritical fluid chromatography

Separation of Amino Acids and Peptides with Supercritical Fluids Chromatography

A Compendium of the Principal Stationary Phases Used in Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography: Where Have We Arrived?

Supercritical Fluid Chromatography and Its Application in Lipid Isomer Separation

Characterization of High‐Pressure Liquid Chromatography Columns using Chromatographic Methods

Limit of the speed-resolution properties in adiabatic supercritical fluid chromatography