Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Quantitative Assessment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Grades and Graft

Shuyi Liu,Jing Liu,Weicui Chen,Lu Zhang,Shanshan Wu,Fei Wang,Jianke Pan,Minghui Luo,Xian Liu,Shuixing Zhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27322
IF: 4.4
2020-08-20
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>As the need for quantitative assessment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and ACL graft increases, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) becomes a more valuable measuring tool. However, DTI changes in differing injury grades of ACL and longitudinal graft remain unclear.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the diagnostic performance of DTI in quantitatively assessing ACL injury severity and the development of ACL grafts within 6 months of surgery.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Study Type</h3><p>A cohort study.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Subjects</h3><p>Thirty‐five patients diagnosed with grades I–IV ACL injuries and 20 volunteers as controls were recruited.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Field Strength/Sequence</h3><p>T<sub>1</sub>‐weighted, T<sub>2</sub>‐weighted, proton density (PD)‐weighted, and DTI at 3.0T MRI. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Assessment</h3><p>ACL injury grades in arthroscopic images and DTI quantitative data were evaluated from July 2016 to July 2018.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Statistical Tests</h3><p>Chi‐square test, analysis of variance, Spearman correlation analysis, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Both fractional anisotropy (FA) (<i>r =</i> −0.898, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) (<i>r =</i> 0.851, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) were significantly correlated with the severity of ACL injuries. The area under the curve (AUC) values for differentiation between low‐ and high‐grade ACL injuries with FA and ADC were 0.973 and 0.963, respectively. Although there were no significant differences in FA (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05) and ADC (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05) between grades I and II ACL injuries or in ADC (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.05) between grades III and IV, there were significant differences in FA and ADC between two grades (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). There were significant differences in FA (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) and ADC (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) between normal ACL and 3‐month graft postoperation, as well as in ADC values between 3‐month and 6‐month graft postoperation (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Data Conclusion</h3><p>DTI could be used to quantitatively evaluate the ACL injury grades and the development of ACL grafts. The diagnostic efficiency of FA values was higher than that of ADC values.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Level of Evidence</h3><p>1</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Technical Efficacy</h3><p>Stage 3</p></section>
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?