11 The Psychometric Characteristics of a Novel Metamemory Questionnaire for Children
Mary Godfrey,Samantha van Terheyden,Gabriel Loud,Jack Wiese,Maxine Reger,Christopher Vaughan,Gerard Gioia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617723006823
2023-11-01
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
Abstract:Objective: Metamemory is a component of metacognition that includes both the knowledge of factors that affect memory (i.e., declarative metamemory) and knowledge and application of factors in one's own learning and recall performance (i.e., procedural metamemory; Kreutzer et al., 1975). Previous researchers have examined children's metamemory through interviews and found that metamemory abilities are positively associated with age and performance on memory measures (see Godfrey et al., 2022 for review). However, there is not yet a standardized measure to evaluate children's metamemory. The current study aimed to examine the psychometric characteristics of a declarative metamemory questionnaire, the Measure of Metamemory (MoM-10), for children ages 6-12 years old. Based on previous research, we hypothesized that performance on the MoM-10 would not be associated with sex but would be positively associated with age and learning and memory performance. Participants and Methods: A total of 75 English-speaking typically developing children between the ages of 6 to 12 years old were recruited for the current study (M age=9.1+1.92; females 49%). Participants completed the MoM-10 which assessed declarative metamemory via 10 multiple choice questions (accuracy score of 0 or 1 points per question) and required participants to provide an explanation for their multiple-choice answer (explanation score of 0, 1, or 2 points per question). The metamemory questionnaire provided two outcome variables: an Accuracy score of 10 possible points, and an Explanation score of 20 possible points. Additionally, participants completed a 3-trial pictorial learning/memory task which provided an Immediate Recall score and Delayed Recall score. Results: As hypothesized, there were no sex differences on the MoM-10 Accuracy scores (t(73)=0.71, p=0.48) or Explanation scores (t(73)=-73, p=0.47). Consistent with our hypothesis, age was significantly associated with Accuracy (r=0.31, p<0.01) and Explanation scores (r=0.79, p<0.001). Internal consistency of the MOM-10 was moderate for the Explanation score (Cronbach's alpha=0.68) and low for the Accuracy score (KR-20=0.54). Lastly, after controlling for age, participants' MoM-10 Accuracy score was significantly associated with Immediate Recall (r=0.32, p<0.01) on the learning/memory task and the Explanation scores were significantly associated with the Immediate Recall (r=0.36, p<0.01) and Delayed Recall scores (r=0.32, p<0.01) on the learning/memory task. Conclusions: The current study presents an initial review of psychometric properties of a metamemory questionnaire for children ages 6 to 12 years old. Additionally, as hypothesized, these results suggest the MOM-10 performance is significantly positively associated with participants' age and immediate and delayed recall performance on a pictorial learning/memory task. These associations provide lines of evidence for convergent validity given the expected maturation of metamemory with both age and with improvements in actual memory performance. However, based on the low internal consistency of the accuracy scores, further refinement will be explored including possibly rephrasing questions from the current item set or perhaps excluding current items in future use of the scale.
psychology,clinical neurology,psychiatry,neurosciences