Abstract:In low-resource settings where disease burdens remain high and many health facilities lack essentials such as drugs or commodities, functional equipment, and trained personnel, poor quality of care often results and the impact can be profound. In this paper, we systematically quantify the potential gain of addressing quality of care globally using country-level data about antenatal, childbirth, and postnatal care interventions.In this study, we created deterministic models to project health outcomes if quality of care was addressed in a representative sample of 81 low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). First, available data from health facility surveys (e.g., Service Provision Assessment [SPA] and Service Availability and Readiness Assessment [SARA]) conducted 2007–2016 were linked to household surveys (e.g., Demographic and Health Surveys [DHS] and Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys [MICS]) to estimate baseline coverage for a core subset of 19 maternal and newborn health interventions. Next, models were constructed with the Lives Saved Tool (LiST) using country-specific baseline levels in countries with a linked dataset (<em>n</em> = 17) and sample medians applied as a proxy in countries without linked data. Lastly, these 2016 starting baseline levels were raised to reach targets in 2020 as endline based upon country-specific utilization (e.g., proportion of women who attended 4+ antenatal visits, percentage of births delivered in a health facility) from the latest DHS or MICS population-based reports. Our findings indicate that if high-quality health systems could effectively deliver this subset of evidence-based interventions to mothers and their newborns who are already seeking care, there would be an estimated 28% decrease in maternal deaths, 28% decrease in neonatal deaths, and 22% fewer stillbirths compared to a scenario without any change or improvement in quality of care. Totals of 86,000 (range, 77,800–92,400) maternal and 0.67 million (range, 0.59 million–0.75 million) neonatal lives could be saved, and 0.52 million (range, 0.48 million–0.55 million) stillbirths could be prevented across the 81 countries in the calendar year 2020 when adequate quality care is provided at current levels of utilization. Limitations include the paucity of data to individually assess quality of care for each intervention in all LMICs and the necessary assumption that quality of care being provided among the subset of countries with linked datasets is comparable or representative of LMICs overall.Our findings suggest that efforts to close the quality gap would still produce substantial benefits at current levels of access or utilization. With estimated mortality rate declines of 21%–32% on average, gains from this first step would be significant if quality was improved for selected antenatal, intrapartum, and postnatal interventions to benefit pregnant women and newborns seeking care. Interventions provided at or around the time of childbirth are most critical and accounted for 64% of the impact overall estimated in this quality improvement analysis.

Measuring the cost-effectiveness of midwife-led versus physician-led intrapartum teams in developing countries

A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Low-Risk Deliveries: A Comparison of Midwives, Family Physicians and Obstetricians

Increasing the number of midwives is necessary but not sufficient: using global data to support the case for investment in both midwife availability and the enabling work environment in low- and middle-income countries

Efficiency of Antenatal Care and Childbirth Services in Selected Primary Health Care Facilities in Rural Tanzania: a Cross-Sectional Study

Cost of Maternal Health Services in Selected Primary Care Centres in Ghana: a Step Down Allocation Approach

Investing in midwifery for sustainable development goals in low- and middle-income countries: a cost-benefit analysis

The provision of midwife-led care in low-and middle-income countries: An integrative review

National and sub-national analysis of the health benefits and cost-effectiveness of strategies to reduce maternal mortality in Afghanistan

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1.4 Million Pregnancies

Midwife-led birthing centres in four countries: a case study

A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of maternity models of care

Incremental cost and cost-effectiveness of low-dose, high-frequency training in basic emergency obstetric and newborn care as compared to status quo: part of a cluster-randomized training intervention evaluation in Ghana

Cost of Installing and Operating an Electronic Clinical Decision Support System for Maternal Health Care: Case of Tanzania Rural Primary Health Centres

Estimating the global impact of poor quality of care on maternal and neonatal outcomes in 81 low- and middle-income countries: A modeling study

Care pathways for reduced fetal movements: A cost‐consequence analysis

Getting midwives back to hospitals: A discrete choice experiment

Status of the Midwifery Workforce and Childbirth Services and the Impact of Midwife Staffing on Birth Outcomes in China: a Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study.

Impact of Scaling Up Health Intervention Coverage on Reducing Maternal Mortality in 26 Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Modelling Study.

Comparison of Midwives' Self-Perceived Essential Competencies Between Low and High Maternal Mortality Ratio Provinces in China

Clinical outcomes and financial estimates for women attending the largest private midwifery service in Australia compared to national data: a retrospective cohort study

Cost-effectiveness of Health Systems Strengthening Interventions in Improving Maternal and Child Health in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: a Systematic Review