Impact of a multi-pronged cholera intervention in an endemic setting
Alexandre Blake,Adam Walder,Ephraim Hanks,Placide Okitayembo Welo,Francisco Luquero,Didier Bompangue,Nita Bharti,Blake,A.,Walder,A.,Hanks,E.,Welo,P. O.,Luquero,F.,Bompangue,D.,Bharti,N.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.14.23299970
2023-12-18
MedRxiv
Abstract:Cholera is a bacterial water-borne diarrheal disease that causes high morbidity in sub-Saharan Africa and Asia. It is transmitted via the fecal-oral route and can be prevented with vaccination and Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) improvements. WASH improvements are resource and time intensive but provide long lasting benefits. Vaccination campaigns can be implemented more rapidly than WASH but provide only temporary immunity; cholera vaccines are effective in epidemic settings but their utility in endemic settings is unclear. The city of Kalemie in the Democratic Republic of Congo, on the shore of Lake Tanganyika, is a cholera endemic area with annual outbreaks. Both seasonal mobility and the lake, which is a bacterial reservoir, promote transmission, though their relative contributions are unknown. In 2013-2016 Kalemie received a targeted vaccination campaign and WASH improvements. We assessed the short-term impact of this intervention to guide future control strategies in endemic settings. We fit a Susceptible-Infected-Recovered-Susceptible model with a compartment for the aquatic bacterial population. We estimated the number of cases avoided by each arm of the intervention, explored alternative vaccination strategies, and investigated the relative contributions of mobility and environmentally-based transmission in local cholera dynamics. We estimated that vaccination and WASH improvements prevented 3,484 cases (95% Credible Interval: 2,412-4,833) over a 118-week period. We showed that vaccination could prevent more cases by altering the timing and increasing the target population size. We found that transmission was primarily environmentally-driven and that removing environmental exposure or reducing environmental contamination could decrease local transmission. Together, the targeted nature of the vaccination campaign, the modest scale of WASH improvements, and the high background immunity of the population limited the impact of the intervention. Constant environmentally-driven force of infection maintains high levels of cholera immunity in the population and decreases the impact of vaccination in this endemic area.