Abstract:Accumulated evidence identifies discernible gender gaps across many dimensions of professional academic careers including salaries, publication rates, journal placement, career progress, and academic service. Recent work in political science also reveals gender gaps in citations, with articles written by men citing work by other male scholars more often than work by female scholars. This study estimates the gender gap in citations across political science subfields and across methodological subfields within political science, sociology, and economics. The research design captures variance across research areas in terms of the underlying distribution of female scholars. We expect that subfields within political science and social science disciplines with more women will have smaller gender citation gaps, a reduction of the “Matthew effect” where men’s research is viewed as the most central and important in a field. However, gender citation gaps may persist if a “Matilda effect” occurs whereby women’s research is viewed as less important or their ideas are attributed to male scholars, even as a field becomes more diverse. Analysing all articles published from 2007–2016 in several journals, we find that female scholars are significantly more likely than mixed gender or male author teams to cite research by their female peers, but that these citation rates vary depending on the overall distribution of women in their field. More gender diverse subfields and disciplines produce smaller gender citation gaps, consistent with a reduction in the “Matthew effect”. However, we also observe undercitation of work by women, even in journals that publish mostly female authors. While improvements in gender diversity in academia increase the visibility and impact of scholarly work by women, implicit biases in citation practices in the social sciences persist.

Ranking women economists in the U.S. South: results from citation counts and metrics

Seeking the “Missing Women” of Economics with the Undergraduate Women in Economics Challenge

The unequal distribution of economic education: A report on the race, ethnicity, and gender of economics majors at U.S. colleges and universities

GENDER DIVERSITY IN RESEARCH TEAMS AND CITATION IMPACT IN ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT

Presence of Women in Economics Academia: Evidence from India

The academic origins of economics faculty

Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields

Salary inequality in young professors: evidence from public U.S. economic department

Teaching Methods in Undergraduate Intermediate Theory, Statistics and Econometrics, and Other Upper-Division Economics Courses: Results From a Sixth National Quinquennial Survey

Diagnosing the Learning Environment for Diverse Students in Introductory Economics: An Analysis of Relevance, Belonging, and Growth Mindsets

Obstacles to Sustaining Diversity: Historical Context and Current Experiences of Underrepresented Minority Women and Men in Sociology and Economics

Comparative analysis of gender disparity in academic positions based on U.S. region and STEM discipline

Gender gaps in research productivity and recognition among elite scientists in the U.S., Canada, and South Africa

Gender Differences in First Jobs for New US PhDs in the Mathematical Sciences

A view of mathematics research productivity at U.S. regional public universities

Differential correction of gender imbalance for top-cited scientists across scientific subfields over time

Explaining heterogeneity in student diversity across economics departments

On the lack of women researchers in the Middle East & North Africa

Does a gender disparity exist in academic rank? Evidence from an Australian university

Pedagogical practices and the gender gap in economics education

Ivory tower in MD/PhD programmes: sticky floor, broken ladder and glass ceiling