Abstract:BACKGROUND Background: Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) has been demonstrated to be cost- and clinically effective. There is a need, however, for increased therapist contact for some patient groups. Combining iCBT with traditional face-to-face consultations in a blended format may produce a new treatment format (B-CBT) with multiple benefits from both traditional CBT and iCBT such as individual adaptation, lower costs than traditional therapy, wide geographical and temporal availability, and possibly lower threshold to implementation. OBJECTIVE The primary aim of the present study is to compare directly the clinical effectiveness of B-CBT with face-to-face CBT (FtF-CBT) for adult major depressive disorder. METHODS Methods: The study was designed as a two-arm randomised controlled non-inferiority trial comparing B-CBT for adult depression with treatment as usual (TAU). In the blended condition six sessions of FtF-CBT was alternated with six to eight online modules. TAU comprised twelve sessions of FtF-CBT. All participants were eighteen years of age or older and met the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental disorders 4th edition (DSM-IV). Participants were randomised on an individual level by a researcher not involved in the project. At baseline, demographic characteristics (age, gender, marital status, highest level of education, occupational status), current other treatment, and treatment preference was recorded. The primary outcome was change in depression severity on the patient-health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Secondary analyses included questionnaires measuring client satisfaction (CSQ-8), patient expectancy (CEQ), and working (WAI and TAI). The primary outcome was analysed by applying maximum likelihood estimation of a mixed effects model including all available data from baseline, weekly measures, three-, and six-months follow-up. RESULTS Results: A total of N=76 were randomised, n=38 allocated to each treatment, age ranged from 18 to 71 years (SD=13.96) with 73.7% (n=56) female. Attrition rate was 19.7% (n=15), less from the FtF-CBT group (15.8%, n=6) than the B-CBT group (23.7%, n=9). Completion was defined as having completed >= 9 sessions, which was achieved by n=53 (69.7%) almost equally distributed between the groups (nFtF-CBT=27 (71.1%), nB-CBT= 26 (68.4%)). The mean change in depression severity from baseline to twelve-months follow-up was 11.38 in the FtF-CBT group and 8.10 in the B-CBT group. At six months, the mean difference was a mere 0.17 point on the PHQ-9. The primary analyses confirmed large and significant within group reductions in both groups (FtF-CBT: ß = -0.03, SE = 0.00, P < .001; B-CBT: ß = -0.02, SE = 0.00, P < .001). There was a very small but significant interaction effect between groups (ß = 0.01, SE = 0.00, P = .026), which might reflect a tendency to a faster symptom reduction in the FtF group and a lower score after twelve months. Employment status appeared to influence effect differently between the groups, were the B-CBT group was seen to profit more from not being full time employed than the FtF group. CONCLUSIONS Discussion: With large within-group effects in both treatment arms, the study demonstrated feasibility of B-CBT in Denmark. At six-months follow-up, there appeared to be no difference between the two treatment formats, with a small but non-significant difference at twelve months. The study seems to demonstrate that B-CBT is capable of producing treatment effects that are non-inferior to FtF-CBT and that completion rates and satisfaction rates were likewise non-inferior. However, the study was limited by small sample size and should be interpreted with caution. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02796573 INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1140-y

Smartphone-Supported versus Full Behavioural Activation for Depression: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Behavioral activation-based guided self-help treatment administered through a smartphone application: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Behavioural activation versus mindfulness-based guided self-help treatment administered through a smartphone application: a randomised controlled trial

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Smartphone App–Led Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression Under Therapist Supervision: Open Trial

Smartphone Cognitive Behavioral Therapy as an Adjunct to Pharmacotherapy for Refractory Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial

Is clinician-supported use of a mindfulness smartphone app a feasible treatment for depression? A mixed-methods feasibility study

Guided and unguided CBT for social anxiety disorder and/or panic disorder via the Internet and a smartphone application: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

The MobiliseMe study: A randomised controlled efficacy trial of a cognitive behavioural therapy smartphone application (ClearlyMe®) for reducing depressive symptoms in adolescents.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Blended With Synchronous Chat Sessions to Treat Adolescent Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial

Examining a Fully Automated Mobile-Based Behavioral Activation Intervention in Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Effectiveness of Blended CBT Compared to Face-to-Face CBT: a Randomised Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial (Preprint)

Long-Term Outcomes of a Therapist-Supported, Smartphone-Based Intervention for Elevated Symptoms of Depression and Anxiety: Quasiexperimental, Pre-Postintervention Study

Smartphone application‐delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia with telephone support for insomnia disorder compared to a waitlist control: a randomised clinical trial

Impact of Smartphone App-Based Psychological Interventions for Reducing Depressive Symptoms in People With Depression: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a CBT-based smartphone application for improving mental health outcomes in adolescents: the MobiliseMe study

Comparing Online and On-Site Cognitive Behavior Therapy in Major Depressive Disorder: Protocol for a Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial

Four 2×2 factorial trials of smartphone CBT to reduce subthreshold depression and to prevent new depressive episodes among adults in the community-RESiLIENT trial (Resilience Enhancement with Smartphone in LIving ENvironmenTs): a master protocol

Adjunctive use of mindfulness-based mobile application in depression: randomized controlled study

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) Telehealth Augmented With a CBT Smartphone Application to Address Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management: A Randomized Pilot Trial

Comparing Message-Based Psychotherapy to Once-Weekly, Video-Based Psychotherapy for Moderate Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial

The efficacy of app‐supported smartphone interventions for mental health problems: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials