Abstract:“Improving function is one of the major goals of any multidisciplinary team treating patients with chronic pain.” This rather obvious statement, repeated many times in the literature, presents 2 fundamental problems, namely, how is “function” defined and how do we best measure it? The literature as a whole suffers from imprecise terminology, and function is no exception. Terms used include physical functioning, functional ability, physical ability, physical activity, activity, capacity, performance, activity level, functional status, functional limitations, physical inability, activity restrictions, and physical functional status. The words capacity, performance and ability, but also functional and physical, are being used interchangeably, causing significant confusion. In order for clinicians and researchers to understand each other, a common language with clear definitions of terms is imperative. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) may provide a framework hitherto lacking. The ICF framework provides a biopsychosocial model that identifies 3 concepts described from the perspective of body systems, the individual, and society. Within the context of health, the ICF defined “Bodily Functions and Structures” as physiological functions of body systems or anatomical elements, such as organs, limbs, and their components. “Activity” was defined as the execution of specific tasks or actions by an individual, whereas “Participation” was envisioned as encompassing involvement in a life situation. In ICF, functioning refers to all body functions, activities, and participation. Each component of the ICF can be expressed in either neutral or negative terms. Disability is the ICF umbrella term for impairment, activity limitation, and participation restrictions. Although the World Health Organization (WHO) has stated that it is difficult to distinguish between the domains within Activities and Participation, there is evidence that conceptualizing activity as being at the person level and participation at the societal level can separate these concepts. Contextual factors are provided within the ICF framework, consisting of external environmental factors and personal factors. Qualifiers for the Activities and Participation classification make it possible to clearly separate the patient’s inherent capacity to perform actions within a domain and performance in his or her actual environmental context. Capacity refers to the environmentally adjusted inherent ability of the individual, or in other words, the highest probable functioning of a person in a given domain at a given point in time, in a standardized environment. Performance describes what a person actually does in her or his current environment and thus describes the person’s functioning as observed or reported in the person’s real-life environment with the existing facilitators and barriers. From a rehabilitation perspective, the gap between capacity and performance, that is, the difference between what a person can do and what a person actually does, is of particular use for treatment planning and outcome assessment. Having a model as drawn in Figure 1 will give researchers and clinicians a framework

Adaptation of sequential action benefits from timing variability related to lateral basal ganglia circuitry

The frontal cortex adjusts striatal integrator dynamics for flexible motor timing

Rethinking dopamine‐guided action sequence learning

Nucleus accumbens and dorsal medial striatal dopamine and neural activity are essential for action sequence performance

Complementary cognitive roles for D2-MSNs and D1-MSNs during interval timing

Dopamine–endocannabinoid Interactions Mediate Spike-Timing-dependent Potentiation in the Striatum

Distinct coincidence detectors govern the corticostriatal spike timing-dependent plasticity.

Reinforcement regulates timing variability in thalamus

Effects of PPAR gamma agonists on cardiovascular function in obese, non-diabetic patients.

Contributions of the basal ganglia to action sequence learning and performance

Functional capacity testing in patients with chronic pain.

Development of a Family Dynamic Environment Scale for Korean adolescents.

Refinement of efficient encodings of movement in the dorsolateral striatum throughout learning

Cerebello-Thalamic Spike Transfer via Temporal Coding and Cortical Adaptation

Dynamics of striatal action selection and reinforcement learning

Striatal lateral inhibition regulates action selection in a mouse model of levodopa-induced dyskinesia

Multiple dynamic interactions from basal ganglia direct and indirect pathways mediate action selection

Nigrostriatal Dopamine Signals Sequence-Specific Action-Outcome Prediction Errors

Cortical Patterns Shift from Sequence Feature Separation during Planning to Integration during Motor Execution

Reward-driven adaptation of movements requires strong recurrent basal ganglia-cortical loops

Comparative Roles of the Caudate and Putamen in the Serial Order of Behavior: Effects of Striatal Glutamate Receptor Blockade on Variable versus Fixed Spatial Self-Ordered Sequencing in Marmosets