Abstract:In response to China's burgeoning environmental pollution, since 2010, Chinese policymakers have implemented a low-carbon city pilot policy (LCCP) and expanded the pilot project's dimension since then. An accurate evaluation of the consequences of this environmental intervention is vital for the further promotion and extension of this pilot project. In this milieu, we develop a framework to put credibility on this newly intervened policy by harnessing robust econometric approaches. To achieve this objective, we garner integrated data from 2006 to 2014, sourced from two distinct databases: the Chinese Industrial Enterprise database and the China Enterprise Pollution Emissions database. This paper deploys a time-varying Difference in Difference (DID) approach to scrutinize the influence of LCCP on China's emissions reduction agenda from a micro-perspective. The findings reveal that: (1) LCCP significantly reduces enterprise pollution by promoting eco-friendly technologies and innovation capacity; (2) LCCP promotes healthy urbanization and restores the urban ecosystem by abating emissions intensities significantly (i.e., for every one percentage point increase in LCCP, firm-level emissions plummet by 1.87%); (3) LCCP efficacy in controlling emissions varies in terms of ownership, type and location of the firms (i.e., LCCP policy is more efficacious in controlling emissions if the firm is foreign or private-owned if it is a capital and technology-intensive high polluting firm and if the firm is located in eastern and western zones of the country). The findings are robust after replacing the explained variables, changing the estimation method, excluding the interference of outliers, considering the lagged term, and excluding other policy interference. Based on the findings, this study touts the Chinese Government's LCCP policy by providing firm-level theoretical support and empirical evidence for China to boost the revamping strategy of carbon-neutral cities. Therefore, the benefits of pilot cities should be further harnessed to guide enterprises in low-carbon pilot cities so that they can engage in cleaner production activities and achieve green transformation through policy preferences and other incentives. Further policy suggestions have been made in the relevant section.

Does the low-carbon city pilot scheme enhance urban total environmental quality? Evidence from China

Does the low-carbon city pilot contribute to the blue sky defense? Evidence from China

Does Low-Carbon City Construction Improve Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

How does the low-carbon city pilot policy affect the synergistic governance efficiency of carbon and smog? Quasi-experimental evidence from China

Can low-carbon city pilot policies improve urban energy efficiency? evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Low-Carbon City Building and Green Development: New Evidence from Quasi Natural Experiments from 277 Cities in China

Impact of the Low-Carbon City Pilot Project on China's Land Transfers in High Energy-Consuming Industries

The effects of low-carbon city pilot policy on urban land green use efficiency: evidence from 284 cities in China

The policy outcomes of low-carbon city construction on urban green development: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment conducted in China

Environmental regulation and energy efficiency: empirical evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China

Going carbon-neutral in China: Does the low-carbon city pilot policy improve carbon emission efficiency?

Can Low-Carbon City Pilot Policies Reduce Environmental Pollution? Evidence From Prefecture-Level Data in China

Can low-carbon city construction reduce carbon intensity？Empirical evidence from low-carbon city pilot policy in China

Impacts of Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy on Urban Land Green Use Efficiency: Evidence from 283 Cities in China

Low-carbon city pilot and carbon emission efficiency: Quasi-experimental evidence from China

Does Low-Carbon Pilot City Program Reduce Carbon Intensity? Evidence from Chinese Cities

Does Low-Carbon City Construction Promote Integrated Economic, Energy, and Environmental Development? An Empirical Study Based on the Low-Carbon City Pilot Policy in China

How effective has the low-carbon city pilot policy been as an environmental intervention in curbing pollution? Evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises

Does the low-carbon city policy make a difference? Empirical evidence of the pilot scheme in China with DEA and PSM-DID

Does environmental regulation affect urban green technology innovation in China? Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot policy

Environmental protection and economic efficiency of low-carbon pilot cities in China