Pan‐Cancer Survival Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in a National Healthcare System

Sean R. Miller,Matthew Schipper,Lars G. Fritsche,Ralph Jiang,Garth Strohbehn,Erkin Ötleş,Benjamin H. McMahon,Silvia Crivelli,Rafael Zamora‐Resendiz,Nithya Ramnath,Shinjae Yoo,Xin Dai,Kamya Sankar,Donna M. Edwards,Steven G. Allen,Michael D. Green,Alex K. Bryant
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70379
IF: 4.711
2024-11-09
Cancer Medicine
Abstract:In this matched historical cohort study in the Veterans Health Administration system, ICIs had a heterogenous survival benefit by cancer type, and poorer‐prognosis patients derived smaller absolute survival benefits. System‐wide, ICIs accounted for nearly 16,000 life‐years gained within a 5‐year time horizon after treatment. Background The cumulative, health system‐wide survival benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unclear, particularly among real‐world patients with limited life expectancies and among subgroups poorly represented on clinical trials. We sought to determine the health system‐wide survival impact of ICIs. Methods We identified all patients receiving PD‐1/PD‐L1 or CTLA‐4 inhibitors from 2010 to 2023 in the national Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system (ICI cohort) and all patients who received non‐ICI systemic therapy in the years before ICI approval (historical control). ICI and historical control cohorts were matched on multiple cancer‐related prognostic factors, comorbidities, and demographics. The effect of ICI on overall survival was quantified with Cox regression incorporating matching weights. Cumulative life‐years gained system‐wide were calculated from the difference in adjusted 5‐year restricted mean survival times. Results There were 27,322 patients in the ICI cohort and 69,801 patients in the historical control cohort. Among ICI patients, the most common cancer types were NSCLC (46%) and melanoma (10%). ICI demonstrated a large OS benefit in most cancer types with heterogeneity across cancer types (NSCLC: adjusted HR [aHR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54–0.58, p
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?