Abstract:Background: Two acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) subphenotypes (hyperinflammatory and hypoinflammatory) with distinct clinical and biological features and differential treatment responses have been identified using latent class analysis (LCA) in seven individual cohorts. To facilitate bedside identification of subphenotypes, clinical classifier models using readily available clinical variables have been described in four randomised controlled trials. We aimed to assess the performance of these models in observational cohorts of ARDS. Methods: In this observational, multicohort, retrospective study, we validated two machine-learning clinical classifier models for assigning ARDS subphenotypes in two observational cohorts of patients with ARDS: Early Assessment of Renal and Lung Injury (EARLI; n=335) and Validating Acute Lung Injury Markers for Diagnosis (VALID; n=452), with LCA-derived subphenotypes as the gold standard. The primary model comprised only vital signs and laboratory variables, and the secondary model comprised all predictors in the primary model, with the addition of ventilatory variables and demographics. Model performance was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and calibration plots, and assigning subphenotypes using a probability cutoff value of 0·5 to determine sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the assignments. We also assessed the performance of the primary model in EARLI using data automatically extracted from an electronic health record (EHR; EHR-derived EARLI cohort). In Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure (LUNG SAFE; n=2813), a multinational, observational ARDS cohort, we applied a custom classifier model (with fewer variables than the primary model) to determine the prognostic value of the subphenotypes and tested their interaction with the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) strategy, with 90-day mortality as the dependent variable. Findings: The primary clinical classifier model had an area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0·92 (95% CI 0·90-0·95) in EARLI and 0·88 (0·84-0·91) in VALID. Performance of the primary model was similar when using exclusively EHR-derived predictors compared with manually curated predictors (AUC=0·88 [95% CI 0·81-0·94] vs 0·92 [0·88-0·97]). In LUNG SAFE, 90-day mortality was higher in patients assigned the hyperinflammatory subphenotype than in those with the hypoinflammatory phenotype (414 [57%] of 725 vs 694 [33%] of 2088; p<0·0001). There was a significant treatment interaction with PEEP strategy and ARDS subphenotype (p=0·041), with lower 90-day mortality in the high PEEP group of patients with the hyperinflammatory subphenotype (hyperinflammatory subphenotype: 169 [54%] of 313 patients in the high PEEP group vs 127 [62%] of 205 patients in the low PEEP group; hypoinflammatory subphenotype: 231 [34%] of 675 patients in the high PEEP group vs 233 [32%] of 734 patients in the low PEEP group). Interpretation: Classifier models using clinical variables alone can accurately assign ARDS subphenotypes in observational cohorts. Application of these models can provide valuable prognostic information and could inform management strategies for personalised treatment, including application of PEEP, once prospectively validated. Funding: US National Institutes of Health and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.

A systematic review of machine learning models for management, prediction and classification of ARDS

[Progression in the application of machine learning in acute respiratory distress syndrome]

Machine Learning Tools for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Detection and Prediction

Analytics with Artificial Intelligence to Advance the Treatment of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Management of ARDS - What Works and What Does Not

Risk factors analysis of COVID-19 patients with ARDS and prediction based on machine learning

Tree-based ensemble machine learning models in the prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome following cardiac surgery: a multicenter cohort study

Establishment and Validation of Predictive Model of ARDS in critically ill patients

Recent advances in the understanding and management of ARDS

Deep Learning-Based Detection of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: What Are the Models Learning?

Validation and utility of ARDS subphenotypes identified by machine-learning models using clinical data: an observational, multicohort, retrospective analysis

Challenges in ARDS Definition, Management, and Identification of Effective Personalized Therapies

Prediction Model for Critically Ill Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Using Latent Class Analysis to Identify ARDS Sub-phenotypes for Enhanced Machine Learning Predictive Performance

Early predictive values of clinical assessments for ARDS mortality: a machine-learning approach

Multitask Learning With Recurrent Neural Networks for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Prediction Using Only Electronic Health Record Data: Model Development and Validation Study

Multi-Task Learning with Recurrent Neural Networks for ARDS Prediction using only EHR Data: Model Development and Validation Study (Preprint)

Open-source machine learning pipeline automatically flags instances of acute respiratory distress syndrome from electronic health records

Management of the acute respiratory distress syndrome

Segmentation and Classification of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) using Deep Learning

Acute respiratory distress syndrome: A review of ARDS across the life course