Squeaking hips.
W. Walter,T. Waters,M. Gillies,S. Donohoo,S. Kurtz,A. Ranawat,W. Hozack,M. Tuke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00867
Abstract:Introduction eramic-on-ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty were pioneered by Boutin in France during the 1970s. The first generation of alumina ceramic experienced unacceptably high fracture rates. In the 1980s and 1990s, advances in ceramic manufacturing produced alumina components of higher density and smaller grain size, substantially reducing the risk of fracture. The use of ceramics proliferated throughout Europe, although concerns about fracture, raised in the United States, resulted in its classification as a Class-III medical device by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). These circumstances, coupled with the consequences of ceramic fracture, led to the dominance of polyethylene bearings for hip arthroplasty in the United States at the end of the twentieth century. However, in the middle to late 1990s, concern about osteolysis secondary to polyethylene wear prompted a reevaluation of alternate bearings. The fracture rate of secondgeneration alumina was reported by ceramic producers to be reduced to a figure on the order of 1 in 10,000. The wear resistance of ceramic bearings was known to be superior to the conventional polyethylene of the day, which at that time was not highly cross-linked and was still sterilized with gamma radiation in air. By the mid-1990s, therefore, several manufacturers had launched multicenter, prospective, randomized trials through the FDA for ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. At the turn of the millennium, as these trials were reaching completion, an international producer of zirconia ceramic, St. Gobain Desmarquest, announced its withdrawal from the medical market because of unacceptably high fracture rates associated with changes in its manufacturing process. Although Desmarquest’s withdrawal in 2001 involved a different ceramic, the FDA responded with strong scrutiny of the alumina ceramic manufacturers. Compliance with heightened regulatory requirements delayed FDA approval for the use of ceramic bearings in the United States until 2003. Before 2005, squeaking was not recognized as a clinically important complication of ceramic bearings in any of the trials being conducted for the FDA. Over the past four years, the squeaking phenomenon has become well documented but is as yet poorly understood. The prevalence has been reported to range from under 1% to 10% and has been reported in abnormal circumstances such as mismatched ceramic couples, after a ceramic liner fracture, and in a case of cup malposition with severe impingement. An increased risk of squeaking has been demonstrated with acetabular component malposition as well as with younger, heavier, and taller patients. Some authors have suggested that the noise is a result of vibration where the neck of the femoral component impinges on the edge of the acetabular component. However, it may also occur in properly matched ceramic bearings with an ideal acetabular component position and in the absence of neck-to-rim impingement. Reproduction of this effect has been reported in vitro. In rare cases, the squeaking has been intolerable to the patient, prompting revision. Thus, squeaking has emerged as a new and previously unanticipated clinical failure mode for ceramic bearings in the twenty-first century. In this paper, we report data that have been progressively accumulated from a series of studies undertaken by our group to investigate the mechanisms of noise production associated with ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. We compared demographic data between patients with squeaking hips and those with silent hips. Radiographic analysis was used to compare component placement, and an analysis of retrieved squeaking bearings showed the pattern of wear in these hips. Finite element analysis provided us with a model to better understand the mechanics of squeaking, and through acoustic and modal analysis we have been able to suggest the origin of the noise. The long-term goals of our research are to develop an understanding of the mechanisms of squeaking, to provide an approach to its investigation and treatment, and to develop countermeasures for squeaking in the future. C