Assessing availability, prices, and market share of quality-assured malaria ACT and RDT in the private retail sector in Nigeria and Uganda

Meley Woldeghebriel,Ezinne Aso,Erica Berlin,Chizoba Fashanu,Sylvia N. Kirumira,Felix Lam,Robert Mugerwa,Juliet Nakiganda,Tayo Olaleye,Jimmy Opigo,Funlola Osinupebi,Natalie Priestley,Rodger Stringham,Perpetua Uhomoibhi,Theodoor Visser,Abigail Ward,Owens Wiwa,Aaron Woolsey
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-024-04863-9
2024-02-08
Malaria Journal
Abstract:An estimated 50% of suspected malaria cases in sub-Saharan Africa first seek care in the private sector, especially in private medicine retail outlets. Quality of care in these outlets is generally unknown but considered poor with many patients not receiving a confirmatory diagnosis or the recommended first-line artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). In 2010, a subsidy pilot scheme, the Affordable Medicines Facility malaria, was introduced to crowd out the use of monotherapies in favour of WHO-pre-qualified artemisinin-based combinations (WHO-PQ-ACTs) in the private health sector. The scheme improved the availability, market share, and cost of WHO-PQ-ACTs in countries like Nigeria and Uganda, but in 2018, the subsidies were halted in Nigeria and significantly reduced in Uganda. This paper presents findings from six retail audit surveys conducted from 2014 to 2021 in Nigeria and Uganda to assess whether the impact of subsidies on the price, availability, and market share of artemisinin-based combinations has been sustained after the subsidies were reduced or discontinued.
infectious diseases,tropical medicine,parasitology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?