Impact of baseline thrombocytopenia on outcomes in hospitalizations for acute coronary syndrome and non-elective percutaneous coronary intervention: meta-analysis
V Borra,A Mahadevan,R Vempati,S Kukkala,B Makwana,S G Senapati,V Jaiswal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1458
IF: 39.3
2024-10-30
European Heart Journal
Abstract:Background Thrombocytopenia's impact on acute coronary syndromes (ACS) outcomes is poorly understood. A systematic review and meta-analysis aim to elucidate its influence on both short-term and long-term clinical endpoints, guiding tailored management strategies for improved patient care. Methods Our meta-analysis is registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024511832). We conducted a systematic search of PubMed and SCOPUS databases up to February 2024, utilizing keywords to identify studies on ACS or non-elective PCI populations with or without baseline thrombocytopenia (TP) reporting on in-hospital and long-term outcomes. Baseline TP was defined as a platelet count less than 150 x 109/L and had to be established before hospitalization or ACS management or intervention. Binary random effects models were used to estimate pooled unadjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sensitivity analysis was done by the leave-one-out method, and the heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistics. Results From 2,831 identified studies, 10 were identified as eligible for inclusion in our pooled analysis and included 6,588,688 patients. Thrombocytopenia was associated with higher risks of in-hospital mortality (OR=1.89, 95% CI:1.55-2.30, p<0.01), in-hospital Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR=1.99, 95% CI:1.63-2.43, p<0.01), and in-hospital bleeding (OR=2.62, 95% CI:1.89-3.64, p<0.01). Long-term follow-up revealed increased risks of MACE (OR=1.80, 95% CI 1.49-2.18, p<0.01), bleeding (OR=1.63, 95% CI:1.63-2.25, p<0.01), and cardiovascular mortality (OR=2.07, 95% CI:1.76-2.42, p<0.01) with thrombocytopenia. No significant difference was found in in-hospital stroke outcomes and long-term outcomes for stroke and recurrent myocardial infarction between thrombocytopenic and non-thrombocytopenic groups. Conclusion Thrombocytopenia worsens ACS outcomes. Vigilance and tailored management are crucial for mitigating its impact on patient prognosis. Further research is needed for better interventions.Secondary outcomes forest plot
cardiac & cardiovascular systems