Simulations of clonal species genotypic diversity – trembling aspen (Populus tremuloïdes) as a case study

Marie-Claire Namroud,Alain Leduc,F. Tremblay,Y. Bergeron

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-005-9051-3

2006-04-11

Conservation Genetics

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Early Decompressing Craniectomy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Cerebral Edema

Jiang-Biao Gong,Liang Wen,Ren-Ya Zhan,Heng-Jun Zhou,Fang Wang,Gu Li,Xiao-Feng Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5372/1905-7415.0801.261

2014-01-01

Abstract:Background: Decompressing craniectomy (DC) is an important method for the management of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).Objective: To analyze the effect of prophylactic DC within 24 hours after head trauma TBI.Methods: Seventy-two patients undergoing prophylactic DC for severe TBI were included in this retrospective study. Both of the early and late outcomes were studied and the prognostic factors were analyzed.Results: In this series, cumulative death in the first 30 days after DC was 26%, and 28 (53%) of 53 survivors in the first month had a good outcomes. The factors including Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) score at admission, whether the patient had an abnormal pupil response and whether the midline shift was greater than 5 mm were most important prognostic factors for the prediction of death in the first 30 days and the final outcome at 6 months after DC.Conclusion: Prophylactic DC plays an important role in the management of highly elevated ICP, especially when other methods of reduction of ICP are unavailable.
A Prospective Study of Early Versus Late Craniectomy after Traumatic Brain Injury.

L. Wen,H. Wang,F. Wang,J. B. Gong,G. Li,X. Huang,R. Y. Zhan,X. F. Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2011.608214

2011-01-01

Brain Injury

Abstract:BACKGROUND:Decompressive craniectomy is an important method for managing traumatic brain injury (TBI). At present, controversies about this procedure exist, especially about the optimum operative time for patients with TBI.METHODS:A prospective study was performed at the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University. From January 2008 to December 2009, 25 patients who underwent early decompressive craniectomy were included in the study group, and 19 patients who underwent "late" decompressive craniectomy as a second-tier therapy for intracranial hypertension were included as a comparison group.RESULTS:The 30-day mortality after the operation was 16% in the study group. The overall mortality rate was 20% at the 6-month follow-up. A total of 52% of the patients (13 patients) had good outcomes, and 7 patients remained in a severely disabled or vegetative state. In the comparison group, 4 patients died, and 12 had good outcomes at the 6-month follow-up. The remaining 3 patients had poor outcomes. The study group was well matched with the comparison group. However, the outcomes in the study group were not better than those in the comparison group, as evaluated by the 6-month GOS score.CONCLUSION:Early decompressive craniectomy as a first-tier therapy for intracranial hypertension did not improve patient outcome when compared with "late" decompressive craniectomy for managing TBI.
Optimizing Traumatic Brain Injury Recovery: Exploring the Advantages and Results of Decompressive Craniectomy

Aryan Rafieezadeh,Kartik Prabhakaran,Amirhossein Sadeghian,Anna Mary Jose,Bardiya Zangbar

DOI: https://doi.org/10.59556/japi.72.0705

Abstract:Traumatic brain injury (TBI) causes significant mortality and morbidity across regions, imposing a substantial socioeconomic burden on societies. A major complication that can arise is uncontrolled intracranial pressure (ICP). Several strategies exist for reducing ICP in TBI patients, including head elevation, mannitol administration, and hyperventilation. Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a therapeutic approach employed to lower ICP. This technique offers immediate and permanent relief from elevated ICP, although there are ongoing debates regarding its beneficial use and appropriate indications for patients with increased ICP. The objective of this review was to assess variations in surgical technique, timing of the procedure, and patient characteristics associated with DC. Through the evaluation of clinical and radiologic data concerning DC in patients with elevated ICP, it was revealed that while DC provides numerous benefits, it also carries a significant risk of mortality and morbidity. Furthermore, we observed that factors such as age, initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, pupil response, and the time interval between injury and DC can serve as predictors for the procedure's outcomes. Based on our findings, we recommend conducting further trials to shed light on the use of DC in TBI patients.
Subdural effusion secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury

X. F. Yang,L. Wen,J. B. Gong,R. Y. Zhan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0475-2

2009-01-01

Acta Neurochirurgica

Abstract:Dear Editor, Firstly, thanks for the attention on our study. Nowadays, decompressive craniectomy is an important method for the management of patients with severe head trauma, and apparently the prevention and management of complications are crucial parts of this surgical method. Actually, a great part of these complications would be secondary to head trauma or craniotomy as well, including subdural effusion, post-traumatic hydrocephalus, intracranial infection, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, intracranial rehemorrhage, and epilepsy. Subdural effusion is a complication that could be secondary to both head trauma and craniotomy. The incidence rate of subdural effusion in head trauma was between 7 and 12% [3], and that after decompressive craniectomy was between 21 and 50% reportedly [1, 2, 4, 5]. In our series, this rate was 21.3%. We agree on the explanation of the reasons for the high incidence of subdural effusion secondary to decompressive craniectomy from Dr. Cumher Kilincer. However, here we want to emphasize another reason for the development of subdural effusion. We have treated a patient who was transferred to our hospital 2 months after surgical decompression for severe head trauma. The local hospital sent him to our hospital for deterioration of consciousness, and the CT scan disclosed subdural effusion contralateral to the decompressive side (Fig. 1). We reviewed the patient’s medical record, and it was found that though the brain edema was not disclosed from the CT on the late phase of head trauma the treatment of dehydration was still lasted. The excessive dehydration was believed to be an important reason for the development of subdural effusion. After stopping the dehydration, this patient recovered under conservative treatment and the CT approved the resolution of effusion. Such a case may not be the only one, and the development
Surgical Complications Secondary to Decompressive Craniectomy for Patients with Severe Head Trauma

Xiaofeng Yang,Liang Wen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18679/cn11-6030_r.2016.008

2016-01-01

Translational Neuroscience and Clinics

Abstract:Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a surgical method for managing highly elevated intracranial increased pressure (ICP) resulted from severe head trauma. This procedure is able to reduce the ICP rapidly and effectively. However, it may lead to kinds of secondary complications, which would cause patient's severe neurological dysfunction or even death. In this paper, we reviewed the literatures about surgical complications secondary to DC, and tried to bring up suggestions on surgical techniques aiming to prevention and treatment of these complications.
Surgical Complications Secondary to Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with a Head Injury: a Series of 108 Consecutive Cases.

X. F. Yang,L. Wen,F. Shen,G. Li,R. Lou,W. G. Liu,R. Y. Zhan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-008-0145-9

2008-01-01

Acta Neurochirurgica

Abstract:BACKGROUND:Decompressive craniectomy is an important method for managing refractory intracranial hypertension in patients with head injury. We reviewed a large series of patients who underwent this surgical procedure to establish the incidence and type of postoperative complications.METHODS:From 1998 to 2005, decompressive craniectomy was performed in 108 patients who suffered from a closed head injury. The incidence rates of complications secondary to decompressive craniectomy and risk factors for developing these complications were analysed. In addition, the relationship between outcome and clinical factors was analysed.FINDINGS:Twenty-five of the 108 patients died within the first month after surgical decompression. A lower GCS at admission seemed to be associated with a poorer outcome. Complications related to surgical decompression occurred in 54 of the 108 (50%) patients; of these, 28 (25.9%) patients developed more than one type of complication. Herniation through the cranial defect was the most frequent complication within 1 week and 1 month, and subdural effusion was another frequent complication during this period. After 1 month, the "syndrome of the trephined" and hydrocephalus were the most frequent complications. Older patients and/or those with more severe head trauma had a higher occurrence rate of complications.CONCLUSIONS:The potential benefits of decompressive craniectomy can be adversely affected by the occurrence of complications. Each complication secondary to surgical decompression had its own typical time window for occurrence. In addition, the severity of head injury was related to the development of a complication.
The effect of early cranioplasty on prognosis of patients with decompressive craniectomy due to head trauma

Gu LI,Liang WEN,Xiao-feng YANG,fiang-biao GONG,Ren-ya ZHAN,Fang WANG,Lu-ping PAN,Wei-guo LIU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1001-2346.2008.10.011

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objectives This study was performed to ascertain whether early cranioplasty could improve the outcomes in patients with large cranial defects resulted from decompressive surgery after severe head trauma. Methods In this study,a case control cohort study was performed to compare the outcomes of the patients (23 cases) who underwent early cranioplasty ranged from 5 to 8 weeks ( ＜ 2 months) after decompressive craniectomy due to severe traumatic brain injuries with those of the patients (23 cases) undergoing the same procedure within a traditional duration. The data of age,gender and severity of the head trauma were well compared between early cranioplasty group and delayed cranioplasty group. Results There were no differences in patients' demographics,degree of head trauma,types of CT classification,therapy intensity level,size of cranial defects,complications secondary to cranioplasty and therapy for rehabilitation between two groups as well. And 15 months after head trauma,the prognosis of early cranioplasty group (GOS:4.3±0.9;KPS:73.9±22.5) was better than that of delayed cranioplasty group (GOS: 3.8±1.0 ; KPS : 62.6±24.2 ) with significant differences statistically ( GOS : P = 0. 022 ; KPS : P = 0.035 ).Conclusion Early cranioplaty for large cranial defects by decompressive craniectomy is safe and helpful to improve the patients' prognosis,and may contribute to better outcomes than late cranioplasty.
Contralateral haematoma secondary to decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma: a descriptive study of 15 cases.

Liang Wen,Quan-Cheng Li,Shu-Chao Wang,Yu Lin,Gu Li,Jiang-Biao Gong,Fang Wang,Lin Su,Ren-Ya Zhan,Xiao-Feng Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2012.743180

2013-01-01

Brain Injury

Abstract:Background: Contralateral haematoma is an infrequent but severe complication of decompressive craniectomy for head trauma. Method: A retrospective study was performed of patients developing this complication after decompressive craniectomy for head trauma in the institute. Demographics, mechanism of trauma, time interval between trauma and first operation, time interval between first operation and onset of contralateral haematoma and patients' outcomes were recorded for further analysis. Results: Fifteen patients developed this complication in the study; most had epidural haematomas, which appeared within the first 12 hours after decompressive craniectomy in 13 patients, including three haematomas that developed during surgical decompression. Contralateral cranial fracture is a major risk factor for this condition. Only one patient recovered to mild disability. All remaining patients had poor outcomes, with Glasgow coma scale scores <= 3, except for one patient who was lost to follow-up. A literature review of similar studies including 36 patients revealed similar characteristics. Conclusion: Contralateral haematoma secondary to surgical decompression in head trauma can lead to a poor outcome. The prompt detection and removal of the haematoma are keys to management and routine recurrent computed tomography is recommended after the first operation.
Decompressive craniectomy in children: indications and outcome from a tertiary centre

Subhas K Konar,Y S Dinesh,Dhaval Shukla,Mohammed Nadeem,Nishanth Sadashiva,Lingaraju T S,Harsh Deora,Gyani Jail Singh,Nagesh C Shanbhag

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-024-06513-6

2024-07-01

Abstract:Introduction: The role of decompressive craniectomy (DC) is as a rescue therapy for the treatment of intracranial hypertension. The indications for the DC are variable. Methods: The clinical details, imaging, operative findings and follow-up data of children less than or equal to 18 years of age were reviewed for more information on the children who underwent DC in the last 5 years. Results: During the study period, a total of 128 children underwent DC. The trauma cases were 66, and the non-trauma cases were 62. The common indication for DC was pure acute subdural hematoma 33 (50%), followed by contusion 10 (15%) in the trauma group, and in non-trauma, arterial infarction in 20 (32%) and cerebral venous thrombosis in 17 (27%). Hemicraniectomy was done in 114 (89%), and bifrontal craniectomy was done in 7 (5.4%) cases. The median duration follow-up was 7 months in non-trauma and 6 months in trauma. GCS was less than 8, the motor score was less than 3, and pupillary asymmetry, hypotension and basal cistern effacement were factors related to an unfavourable outcome in the non-trauma group. In regression analysis, only a motor score of less than three was associated with the non-trauma group. Age less than 10 years, GCS less than 8, motor score less than three and preoperative infarction were the predictive factors in univariate analysis, and only GCS less than 8 was the predictive factor for unfavourable factors in regression analysis in the trauma group. Conclusion: The DC is performed as a lifesaving procedure. The unfavourable outcome is slightly higher in non-trauma cases compared to trauma cases. However, the mortality rate is high in trauma cases.
Decompressive craniectomy: A primer for acute care practitioners

Peter George Brindley,Mark Sanderson,Dustin Anderson,Cian O'Kelly

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437241237760

2024-03-24

Abstract:Decompressive craniectomy (DC) involves surgical removal of the skull that overlies swollen, imperiled, brain. This is done to combat intracranial hypertension and mitigate a vicious cycle of secondary brain injury. If, instead, this pathophysiology goes uninterrupted, it can mean brain herniation and brain stem death. As such, DC can save lives when all else fails. Regardless, it is no panacea and can also "ruin deaths," and leave patients profoundly disabled. DC is not a new procedure; however, this therapy is increasingly noteworthy due to advances in neurocritical care, alongside ethical concerns. We cover the physiological rationale, the surgical basics, the trial data, and focus on secondary decompression (for refractory intracranial pressure (ICP)) rather than primary decompression (i.e. during evacuation of an intracranial mass). Given that DC should not be undertaken indiscriminately, we conclude by introducing ways in which to discuss DC with families and colleagues. Our goal is to provide a primer and common resource for the multidisciplinary team. We aim to increase not only knowledge but wisdom, prudence, collegiality, and family-focused care.
Type II brain 4.1 (4.1B/KIAA0987), a member of the protein 4.1 family, is localized to neuronal paranodes.

R. Ohara,H. Yamakawa,Manabu Nakayama,Osamu Ohara

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-328X(00)00233-3

2000-12-28

Abstract:
Analysis of the efficacy of large decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury

LIU Weiguo,FENG Junfeng,YANG Xiaofeng,SHEN Hong,ZHENG Xuesheng,PAN Desheng,YAO Yu,刘伟国,冯军峰,杨小锋,沈宏,郑学胜,潘德生,姚瑜

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1671-0282.2005.12.014

IF: 1.473

2005-01-01

Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract:Objective To investigate the role of large decompressive craniectomy(LDC) in the management of severe traumatic brain injury(TBI) and very severe TBI,compared with the routine decompressive craniectomy(RDC).Methods Clinical data on 263 patients with severe TBI who were treated by either LDC or RDC in our department were reviewed.One hundred and Thirty-five patients,including 54 very severe TBIs,underwent LDC.Another 128 patients,including 49 very severe TBIs,underwent RDC.Outcomes and postoperative complications of the two kinds of surgical management were compared and analyzed at 6 month follow-up.Results Ninty-six patients(71.7%) obtained effective outcome in the LDC group,while only 75 cases(58.6%) did so in the RDC group.Moreover,the efficacy of LDC to treat very severe TBI was also higher than that of RDC(63.0% vs.36.7%).The incidence of reoperation due to refractory intracranial pressure(ICP) in LDC was significantly lower than that in the RDC group(P<0.05),while the incidence of delayed intracranial hematoma and subdural effusion was significantly higher than that in the RDC group(P<0.05).Conclusion LDC had superiority over RDC in improving the outcome of severe TBI,especially the very severe ones.LDC also could efficiently reduce the chance of reoperation due to refractory ICP,but not the incidence of overall complications.On the contrary,it increased the incidence of delayed intra-cranial hematomas and contralateral subdural effusion.
Decompressive craniectomy at the National Hospital of Niamey: Prospective study of the epidemioclinical profile, indications, surgical techniques, and results in a context of limited resources

Ousmane Issoufou Hamma,Aminath Bariath Kelani,Souleymane Mahamadou Ango,Tidjani Mahamat Hissene,Salifou Mahamane Mobarak,Yahouza Boka Tounga,Assoumane Ibrahim Issa,Gilbert Dechambenoit

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_169_2024

2024-07-05

Abstract:Background: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a neurosurgical technique that is gaining renewed interest due to the worldwide resurgence of head injuries. We aimed to analyze the quality of management and prognosis of patients who underwent this surgery in the context of limited resources. Methods: This was a prospective, longitudinal, descriptive, and analytical study following STROBE, lasting 36 months at the National Hospital of Niamey in patients who had undergone DC. P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: During our study, we collected 74 cases of DC. The mean age was 32.04 years (10-75 years), with male predominance (91.89%). DC was mainly performed following head trauma (95.95%), the main cause of which was road traffic accidents (76%; 54/71). On admission, most patients presented with altered consciousness (95.95%) and pupillary abnormalities (62.16%). The average time between brain damage and brain scan was 31.28 h, with parenchymal contusion being the most frequent lesion (90.54%). The majority of patients (94.59%) underwent decompressive hemicraniectomy. Postoperative complications accounted for 71.62% of all cases, with 33.78% resulting in death. Among survivors, 55.10% had neurological sequelae at the last consultation (27/49). The main factors associated with the risk of death and morbidity were a Glasgow coma score ≤8, pupillary abnormality on admission, the presence of signs of brain engagement, and a long admission delay. Conclusion: Our study shows that the impact of limited resources on our care is moderate. Future research will concentrate on long-term monitoring, particularly focusing on the psychosocial reintegration of patients post-DC.
Outcome of Decompressive Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with persistently elevated Intracranial Pressure on Medical Treatment. (A Prospective Study Controlled by Intra-parenchymal Pressure Monitoring)

Ahmed Elsayed Saleh,Islam Abou El Fetoh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/bmfj.2022.265462

2022-10-14

Benha Medical Journal

Abstract:Back ground: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can result in cerebral edema and vascular changes resulting in an increase in intracranial pressure (ICP), which can lead to further secondary damage.Monitoring of ICP is the standard of care for patients with TBI . Objectives: To evaluate outcome of decompressive craniotomy (DC) for management of severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) with persistently elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) on medical treatment and to determine feasibility, safety and accuracy of intraparenchymal ICP monitoring (IPM). Patients and Methods: Forty-one patients admitted to ICU with STBI underwent clinical evaluation. CT scanning was performed for lesions' description and grading with measurement of midline shift (MLS). IPM was inserted and initial ICP was recorded. Patients failed to respond to medical treatment underwent DC. Study outcome included frequency of postoperative (PO) complications and functional outcome judged by Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) 3, 6 and 12-m after hospital discharge. Results: Twenty-seven patients underwent early DC, while 14 patients had late DC. Unilateral craniectomy was performed in 38 patients and bifrontal craniectomy in 3 patients with diffuse cerebral edema and no MLS. During 48-hr PO, arterial pressure measures gradually increased, while ICP gradually decreased and CPP was progressively increased. Mean duration of ICP monitoring was 4±2.4 days, mean duration of ICU stay was 6.8±3.4 days and mean total hospital stay was 11.4±5 days. Five patients developed surgery-related PO complications and 12 patients died, but there was no surgery related mortality. At end of 12-m follow-up; 9 patients had good recovery, 9 patients had moderate disability and 3 had severe disability, while 3 patients were in vegetative state. Conclusion: Short-term trial of medical treatment judged by ICP monitoring of STBI patients allows early surgical decision making. Decompressive craniectomy for patients with persistently elevated ICP provided rapid control of ICP with subsequent improvement of CPP and little PO surgery-related morbidity and no mortality. DC provided acceptable functional outcome with good recovery rate of 37.5%. ICP monitoring using intraparenchymal sensor provided satisfactory perioperative ICP monitoring.
Endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in rectal cancer: a comparative study.

V. Balena,D. Martino,F. Lorusso,T. Martino,P. Valerio

2010-12-01

Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia

Abstract:OBJECTIVES Endorectal ultrasound was compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative staging for patients with Rectal Cancer. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed with regards to the factors that might influence the risk of local relapse such as T, N and CRM (circumferential resection margin). METHODS From January 2006 to April 2010, 64 patients with rectal cancer were studied preoperatively either by means of MRI scan of the pelvis or endorectal ultrasound scan in order to assess the intramural extension. For 30 out of 64 patients both methods were used (comparing instrumental with histopathological data) while for 34 patients over 64 only ultrasound scan was used. RESULTS Endorectal ultrasound resulted to be more reliable in defining the T (parietal infiltration of the tumor) whereas MRI better defined CRM. CONCLUSIONS Both methods are reliable and complementary enabling an accurate staging of patients with rectal cancer.
Cranioplasty Outcomes from a Tertiary Hospital in a Developing Country

Sultan Jarrar,Mohammad Al Barbarawi,Suleiman Shaheer Daoud,Amer Jaradat,Osama Darabseh,Khaled El-Muwalla,Maram Husenat

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_53_23

2024-04-01

Abstract:Background: Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a surgical procedure to treat refractory increase in intracranial pressure. DC is frequently succeeded by cranioplasty (CP), a reconstructive procedure to protect the underlying brain and maintain cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics. However, complications such as seizures, fluid collections, infections, and hydrocephalus can arise from CP. Our aim is to investigate these complications and their possible risk factors and to discuss whether early or late CP has any effect on the outcome. Materials and methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed, including patients who underwent CP after DC between January 2014 and January 2022. Relevant information was collected such as demographics, type of brain injury, materials used in CP, timing between DC and CP, and postoperative complications. Ultimately, 63 patients were included in our study. We also compared the complication rate between patients who underwent late CP after DC (>90 days) against patients who underwent early CP (<90 days). Results: Most patients were male (78%). The sample median age was 29 years, with pediatric patients, accounting for 36% of the samples. Overall complication rate was 57% and they were seizure/epilepsy in 50% of the patients, fluid collection (28%), infections (25%), posttraumatic hydrocephalus (17%), and bone defect/resorption (3%). Twenty-two percent of patients with complications required reoperation and underwent a second CP. The median (interquartile range) duration between the craniotomy and the CP was 56 (27-102) days, with an early (≤3 months) percentage of 68%. We found no significant difference between early (≤3 months) and late (>3 months) CP regarding complication rates. Conclusion: Despite CP being a simple procedure, it has a considerable rate of complications. Therefore, it is important that surgeons possess adequate knowledge about such complications to navigate these challenges more effectively.
Decompressive Craniectomy: From Ancient Practices to Modern Neurosurgery

Chahat Singh,Pankaj Gharde,Sandeep Iratwar,Prince Verma,Bhushan Triwedi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.64923

2024-07-19

Cureus

Abstract:Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a neurosurgical strategy that expels a parcel of the cranium to relieve pressure on a swollen or herniating brain. This review article explores the history of DC, from its ancient roots in trepanning to its contemporary applications. It then examines the mechanisms by which DC reduces intracranial pressure (ICP) and improves cerebral blood flow. The article highlights the efficacy of DC in treating patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), stroke, and other conditions that cause increased ICP. However, it also acknowledges the potential complications of DC, such as infection and bleeding. The ethical considerations surrounding DC are explored in detail, particularly the challenging decision-making process for patients who are unable to give consent. A specific focus is given to the use of DC in pediatric patients, where the developing brain is especially vulnerable to pressure changes.
The Impact of Cranioplasty on Cerebral Blood Perfusion in Patients Treated with Decompressive Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Liang Wen,Hai-Yan Lou,Jun Xu,Hao Wang,Xin Huang,Jiang-Biao Gong,Bin Xiong,Xiao-Feng Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2015.1075248

2015-01-01

Brain Injury

Abstract:BACKGROUND:A large cranial defect following decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a common sequela in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Such a defect can cause severe disturbance of cerebral blood flow (CBF) regulation. This study investigated the impact of cranioplasty on CBF in these patients.METHODS:Patients who underwent DC and secondary cranioplasty were prospectively studied for a severe TBI. CT perfusion was used to measure CBF before and after cranioplasty. The basal ganglia, parietal lobe and occipital lobe on the decompressed side were chosen as zones of interest for CBF evaluation.RESULTS:Nine patients representing nine cranioplasty procedures were included in the study. Before cranioplasty, CBF on the decompressed side was lower than that on the contralateral side. During the early stage (10 days) after cranioplasty, CBF on the decompressed side was increased and this increase was significant in the parietal and occipital lobe. CBF was also increased on the contralateral side. In addition, the difference in CBF between the contralateral side and the decompressed side was reduced after cranioplasty. Further, the CT perfusion showed that the CBFs decreased again 3 months post-cranioplasty among four cases, but was still higher than those before cranioplasty.CONCLUSIONS:This study indicates that cranioplasty may increase CBF and benefit the recovery in patients with DC for TBI.
Prognostic variables predict clinical outcome after decompressive craniectomy: A single institute experience; A retrospective study

Ebtesam Abdulla,Krishna Das,Kannan Sridharan,Mohammed Waheed,Fatima Abdulla,Joseph Ravindra,Harleen Luther,Andrew Awuah Wireko

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000036876

IF: 1.6

2024-01-11

Medicine

Abstract:Decompressive craniectomy (DC) is a well-established neurosurgical procedure in clinical cases where excessive intracranial pressure (ICP) poses life-threatening risks, and medical interventions are no longer sufficient. [ 1–3 ] Under these circumstances, DC is an important safeguard against mortality and serious, sustained harm. Evidence from prospective randomized trials reported a 52.8% decrease in mortality in individuals with malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarctions post-DC intervention. [ 4–6 ]

medicine, general & internal
Desorption of selected PAHs as individuals and as a ternary PAH mixture within a water-soil-nonionic surfactant system

Taghreed Hussein,Z. Ismail

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2012.696718

IF: 3.475

2013-02-01

Environmental Technology

Abstract:Remediation of soil contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) is a major environmental concern due to the toxic and carcinogenic properties of these compounds. Desorption and partitioning of anthracene, fluorene and pyrene within soil–aqueous systems in the presence of the nonionic surfactants, Triton X-100 and Tween 80,were studied. The results showed that the addition of Tween 80 solution at 10 g/L initial concentration enhanced the desorption of PAHs by 49.6%, 10.7% and 70.2% for anthracene, fluorene, and pyrene, respectively, from soil into aqueous phase at 72 h equilibration, while the addition of Triton X-100 could enhance the desorption of PAHs from soil by 59.5%, 17.4% and 86.3% for anthracene, fluorene and pyrene, respectively, at similar experimental conditions. The desorption behaviour of the tested PAHs in a ternary mixture was changed relatively since, in the presence of less hydrophobic solutes, the solubility of more hydrophobic solutes was increased leading to a higher desorption rate. The results showed that hydrophobicity is the primary property that controls PAH desorption from soil and surfactant sorption onto the soils (Q m) in which the latter were found to be 3.75×10−6 and 4.82×10−6 mol/g for Triton X-100 and Tween 80, respectively.

Simulations of clonal species genotypic diversity – trembling aspen (Populus tremuloïdes) as a case study

Early Decompressing Craniectomy in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Cerebral Edema

A Prospective Study of Early Versus Late Craniectomy after Traumatic Brain Injury.

Optimizing Traumatic Brain Injury Recovery: Exploring the Advantages and Results of Decompressive Craniectomy

Subdural effusion secondary to decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury

Surgical Complications Secondary to Decompressive Craniectomy for Patients with Severe Head Trauma

Surgical Complications Secondary to Decompressive Craniectomy in Patients with a Head Injury: a Series of 108 Consecutive Cases.

The effect of early cranioplasty on prognosis of patients with decompressive craniectomy due to head trauma

Contralateral haematoma secondary to decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma: a descriptive study of 15 cases.

Decompressive craniectomy in children: indications and outcome from a tertiary centre

Decompressive craniectomy: A primer for acute care practitioners

Type II brain 4.1 (4.1B/KIAA0987), a member of the protein 4.1 family, is localized to neuronal paranodes.

Analysis of the efficacy of large decompressive craniectomy in severe traumatic brain injury

Decompressive craniectomy at the National Hospital of Niamey: Prospective study of the epidemioclinical profile, indications, surgical techniques, and results in a context of limited resources

Outcome of Decompressive Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients with persistently elevated Intracranial Pressure on Medical Treatment. (A Prospective Study Controlled by Intra-parenchymal Pressure Monitoring)

Endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in rectal cancer: a comparative study.

Cranioplasty Outcomes from a Tertiary Hospital in a Developing Country

Decompressive Craniectomy: From Ancient Practices to Modern Neurosurgery

The Impact of Cranioplasty on Cerebral Blood Perfusion in Patients Treated with Decompressive Craniectomy for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

Prognostic variables predict clinical outcome after decompressive craniectomy: A single institute experience; A retrospective study

Desorption of selected PAHs as individuals and as a ternary PAH mixture within a water-soil-nonionic surfactant system