Predictors of female American black bear body mass in an anthropogenic landscape
Shelley L. Nelson,Patrick C. Carr,Anthony McBride,Lise M. Aubry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.22577
2024-03-20
Journal of Wildlife Management
Abstract:We quantified the effect of phenotypic, ecological, and anthropogenic factors on American black bear female body mass using data collected from den surveys in northern New Jersey over 35 years. We examine the shared roles of bear characteristics (age, history of human‐black bear conflict), population factors (density, harvest), habitat composition and configuration, and natural food production on female body mass. Our results suggest that age, a past history of conflict behavior, and access to anthropogenic foods within land cover types with low human density support heavier females. Anthropogenic pressure, such as urbanization and habitat loss, can wield many effects on wildlife that radiate through ecosystems. Large carnivores tend to experience these effects more severely than other species, diminishing their viability and altering ecosystem function by suppressing their role as an apex predator. Yet opportunistic carnivores that rely on an omnivorous diet can sometimes take advantage of anthropogenic food and improve their fitness prospects. We quantified the effect of phenotypic and ecological factors on female body mass of the American black bear (Ursus americanus) in New Jersey, USA. Habitat and reliable mast crops in New Jersey keep adult female black bear body mass and reproduction higher than many parts of the United States, and historically, female black bears in the mid‐Atlantic states tend to be larger than in other parts of their range. We used data collected from den surveys (n = 317) in northern New Jersey from 1984 to 2019 to examine the shared roles of climate, anthropogenic pressure (human food subsidies, harvest), habitat composition and configuration, natural food availability (hard mast production), and bear characteristics (age, history of human–black bear conflict) on female black bear body mass using generalized linear mixed models. Adult female body mass was heaviest with increased availability of cultivated crop and within low‐intensity developed land covers, suggesting anthropogenic food subsidies found in these 2 land cover types are contributing to female overall body mass. A history of conflict with humans explained heavier females, and a quadratic effect of age on body mass supported a senescent decline in adult female body mass later in life. Our results suggest that access to specific land cover types (i.e., crops, low‐intensity developments) that provide a diversity of food (e.g., corn, soft and hard mast) and support low human densities, explains female black bear body mass in a fragmented landscape.
ecology,zoology