Abstract:BACKGROUND: Preoperative three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions for liver surgery planning have been shown to be effective in reduction of blood loss and operation time. However, the role of the 'presentation modality' is not well investigated. We present the first study to compare 3D PDFs, 3D printed models (PR) and virtual reality (VR) 3D models with regard to anatomical orientation and personal preferences in a high volume liver surgery center.METHODS: Thirty participants, 10 medical students, 10 residents, 5 fellows and 5 hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) experts, assigned the tumor-bearing segments of 20 different patient's individual liver reconstructions. Liver models were presented in a random order in all modalities. Time needed to specify the tumor location was recorded. In addition, a score was calculated factoring in correct, wrong and missing segment assignments. Furthermore, standardized test/questionnaires for spatial thinking and seeing, vegetative side effects and usability were completed.RESULTS: Participants named significantly more correct segments in VR (P=0.040) or PR (P=0.036) compared to PDF. Tumor assignment was significantly shorter with 3D PR models compared to 3D PDF (P<0.001) or VR application (P<0.001). Regardless of the modality, HPB experts were significantly faster (24±8 <i>vs.</i> 35±11 sec; P=0.014) and more often correct (0.87±0.12 <i>vs.</i> 0.83±0.15; P<0.001) than medical students. Test results for spatial thinking and seeing had no influence on time but on correctness of tumor assignment. Regarding usability and user experience the VR application achieved the highest scores without causing significant vegetative symptoms and was also the most preferred method (n=22, 73.3%) because of the multiple functions like scaling and change of transparency. Ninety percent (n=27) stated that this application can positively influence the operation planning.CONCLUSIONS: 3D PR models and 3D VR models enable a better and partially faster anatomical orientation than reconstructions presented as 3D PDFs. User's preferred the VR application over the PR models and PDF. A prospective trial is needed to evaluate the different presentation modalities regarding intra- and postoperative outcomes.

Comparing a virtual reality head-mounted display to on-screen three-dimensional visualization and two-dimensional computed tomography data for training in decision making in hepatic surgery: a randomized controlled study

Augmented reality in the operating room: a clinical feasibility study

IMHOTEP: cross-professional evaluation of a three-dimensional virtual reality system for interactive surgical operation planning, tumor board discussion and immersive training for complex liver surgery in a head-mounted display

Virtual reality and 3D printing improve preoperative visualization of 3D liver reconstructions—results from a preclinical comparison of presentation modalities and user’s preference

Ultra-high-fidelity virtual reality mastoidectomy simulation training: a randomized, controlled trial

Virtual Reality for Surgical Planning – Evaluation Based on Two Liver Tumor Resections

Mixed Reality in Visceral Surgery: Development of a Suitable Workflow and Evaluation of Intraoperative Use-cases

Head-Mounted Display Virtual Reality Is Effective in Orthopaedic Training: A Systematic Review

New dimensions in surgical training: immersive virtual reality laparoscopic simulation exhilarates surgical staff

Virtual reality simulation training in laparoscopic surgery – does it really matter, what simulator to use? Results of a cross-sectional study

IMHOTEP - Virtual Reality Framework for Surgical Applications

Advanced liver surgery training in collaborative VR environments

Developing a Virtual Reality Simulation System for Preoperative Planning of Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery

Surgical planning in virtual reality: a systematic review

Comparison of 2D and autostereoscopic 3D visualization during mixed reality simulation

Clinical acceptance of advanced visualization methods: a comparison study of 3D-print, virtual reality glasses, and 3D-display

Fully Immersive Virtual Reality for Skull-base Surgery: Surgical Training and Beyond

The use of virtual reality for the functional simulation of hepatic tumors (case control study).

Assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer using novel immersive high-performance virtual reality rendering of abdominal computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging

Randomized controlled trial of the CMR immersive virtual reality (IVR) headset training compared to e-learning for operating room configuration of the CMR versius robot

Virtual Reality vs Phantom Model: Benefits and Drawbacks of Simulation Training in Neurosurgery