Abstract:Background: Longitudinal matching can mitigate confounding in observational, real-world studies of time-dependent treatments. To date, these methods have required iterative, manual re-specifications to achieve covariate balance. We propose a longitudinal extension of genetic matching, a machine learning approach that automates balancing of covariate histories. We examine performance by comparing the proposed extension against baseline propensity score matching and time-dependent propensity score matching. Methods: To evaluate comparative performance, we developed a Monte Carlo simulation framework that reflects a static treatment assigned at multiple time points. Data generation considers a treatment assignment model, a continuous outcome model, and underlying covariates. In simulation, we generated 1,000 datasets, each consisting of 1,000 subjects, and applied: (1) nearest neighbour matching on time-invariant, baseline propensity scores; (2) sequential risk set matching on time-dependent propensity scores; and (3) longitudinal genetic matching on time-dependent covariates. To measure comparative performance, we estimated covariate balance, efficiency, bias, and root mean squared error (RMSE) of treatment effect estimates. In scenario analysis, we varied underlying assumptions for assumed covariate distributions, correlations, treatment assignment models, and outcome models. Results: In all scenarios, baseline propensity score matching resulted in biased effect estimation in the presence of time-dependent confounding, with mean bias ranging from 29.7% to 37.2%. In contrast, time-dependent propensity score matching and longitudinal genetic matching achieved stronger covariate balance and yielded less biased estimation, with mean bias ranging from 0.7% to 13.7%. Across scenarios, longitudinal genetic matching achieved similar or better performance than time-dependent propensity score matching without requiring manual re-specifications or normality of covariates. Conclusions: While the most appropriate longitudinal method will depend on research questions and underlying data patterns, our study can help guide these decisions. Simulation results demonstrate the validity of our longitudinal genetic matching approach for supporting future real-world assessments of treatments accessible at multiple time points.

A Constructive GAN-based Approach to Exact Estimate Treatment Effect without Matching

Optimal Estimation of Generalized Average Treatment Effects using Kernel Optimal Matching

A Generative Approach for Treatment Effect Estimation under Collider Bias: from an Out-of-Distribution Perspective

Propensity Score Synthetic Augmentation Matching Using Generative Adversarial Networks (PSSAM-GAN).

Assessment of Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Estimation Accuracy via Matching

Robust nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects: A propensity score‐based varying coefficient approach

Partial Identification of the Average Treatment Effect with Stochastic Counterfactuals and Discordant Twins

Group Average Treatment Effects for Observational Studies

GPMatch: A Bayesian Doubly Robust Approach to Causal Inference with Gaussian Process Covariance Function As a Matching Tool

Directed Acyclic Graph Assisted Method For Estimating Average Treatment Effect

Matching Estimators for Causal Effects of Multiple Treatments

A nonparametric super-efficient estimator of the average treatment effect

Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks for Individualized Treatment Effect Estimation and Treatment Selection

Counterfactual Generative Models for Time-Varying Treatments

Genetic matching for time-dependent treatments: a longitudinal extension and simulation study

A comparison of methods for estimating the average treatment effect on the treated for externally controlled trials

A Unified Framework for Efficient Estimation of General Treatment Models

Individualized causal mediation analysis with continuous treatment using conditional generative adversarial networks

Parametric G-computation for Compatible Indirect Treatment Comparisons with Limited Individual Patient Data

Matching within a hybrid RCT/RWD: framework on associated causal estimands

On the Comparative Analysis of Average Treatment Effects Estimation Via Data Combination