Comparison of diagnostic methods for onychomycosis, and proposal of a diagnostic algorithm

M Y Jung,J H Shim,J H Lee,J M Yang,D-Y Lee,K-T Jang,N Y Lee,J-H Lee,J-H Park,K K Park
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ced.12593
Abstract:Background: Traditionally, the gold standard for diagnosis of onychomycosis has been the combination of direct microscopy with potassium hydroxide (KOH) staining and fungal culture. However, several studies have suggested that periodic-acid-Schiff (PAS) staining of nail-plate clippings may be a very sensitive method for the diagnosis of onychomycosis. Aim: To compare the sensitivities of direct microscopy with KOH, fungal culture and PAS staining of nail-plate clippings, and to define an efficient, high-yield and cost-effective diagnostic strategy for the diagnosis of onychomycosis in the clinical setting. Methods: We evaluated a total of 493 patients with clinically suspected onychomycosis. Group A comprised 400 patient samples, evaluated using fungal culture and PAS stain, while group B comprised 93 patient samples evaluated using KOH, fungal culture and PAS. Diagnosis of onychomycosis was defined as clinical morphology plus at least one positive test result. Results: In group A, sensitivities of fungal culture and PAS were 49.5% and 93.1% (P < 0.005), respectively. In group B, the most sensitive single test was PAS (88.2%) followed by KOH (55.9%) and fungal culture (29.4%). The combination of fungal culture and PAS (94.1%) was significantly (P < 0.001) more sensitive than that of KOH and culture (72.1%). Conclusion: PAS staining of nail clippings is much more sensitive than KOH and fungal culture for the diagnosis of onychomycosis. Based on our results, we propose a diagnostic algorithm for onychomycosis that takes into consideration the sensitivity, cost-effectiveness and necessary time for each test.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?