Prescribing practice for intermittent oxygen therapy: a GP survey

B. O'Neill,J. Bradley,A. McKevitt,L. Heaney,M. Riley,V. McGovem,J. Macmahon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1479972304CD036OA

2004-07-01

Chronic Respiratory Disease

Abstract:Introduction:UK figures show that the prescription of home oxygen cylinders for intermittent use is substantial. Aim: To examine GP assessment criteria and prescribing practice for intermittent oxygen therapy in patients with a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Northern Ireland. Methods:A postal questionnaire was sent to all GPs (n = 534) in two health boards who had prescribed cylinder oxygen in a six month period prior to the study. The questionnaire was piloted to establish reliability and validity. Results:Completed questionnaires were returned by 52% (280/534) of GPs. GPs ‘most frequently’ used advice from hospital specialists [82% (230/280)] to determine the need for intermittent oxygen. Criteria such as breathlessness score on exercise (e.g., BORG), oximetry on exercise, local guidelines or national guidelines were used less frequently or never. Conclusions:Most patients are likely to have been prescribed intermittent oxygen without any objective assessment. Implementation of evidence-based guidelines and a formal oxygen assessment service, would rationalize the use of intermittent oxygen therapy and enable better targeting of this expensive resource.