ALS Untangled No. 17: “When ALS Is Lyme”
R. Bedlack,O. Hardiman,T. Heiman-Patterson,L. Gutmann,M. Bromberg,L. Ostrow,G. Carter,E. Kabashi,T. Bertorini,T. Mozaffar,P. Andersen,Jeff Dietz,Josep Gamez,M. Dimachkie,Yunxia Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17482968.2012.717796
2012-09-01
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Abstract:ISSN 1748-2968 print/ISSN 1471-180X online © 2012 Informa Healthcare DOI: 10.3109/17482968.2012.717796 general) cognitive defi cits such as verbal fl uency (4). Whether or not Lyme can cause brain damage in these same regions is controversial; if so, it is exceedingly rare (5). Even if there is overlap in the brain regions affected by ALS and Lyme, a very general coincidence/overlap between two conditions such as this does not mean that they are causally related. The Vaughters fail to mention that 90% of patients with Lyme report or have a specifi c type of rash called erythema migrans (6); PALS rarely, if ever, do. The most common symptoms and signs of nervous system Lyme disease are headache, stiff neck, photosensitivity and fever (from lymphocytic meningitis), reversible facial nerve palsy, eye movement abnormalities, and monoor oligo-radiculopathy that produces dermatomal pain and sensory loss in addition to weakness (5). PALS do not present with headache, stiff neck, photosensitivity, fever or reversible facial weakness, and rarely have eye movement abnormalities, dermatomal pain or sensory loss. Thus, in reality, there is little overlap between the typical clinical picture of ALS and that of nervous system Lyme disease. Very rarely, Lyme has been reported to cause encephalomyelitis and/or polyradiculopathy. If these occurred together they could produce upper and lower motor neuron signs (the hallmark of ALS), but again they should be accompanied by clinical and laboratory features that are not part of ALS such as pain, sensory loss, and focal infl ammatory changes on neuroimaging and/or spinal fl uid (5,7). Secondly, the Vaughters argue that geographic locations and occupations with a high incidence of Lyme disease diagnosed by Centers for Disease Control (CDC) criteria also have a high incidence of ALS. Again, here we see coincidence being accepted as causality. The authors downplay other potential explanations for geographic and occupational clusters of ALS (8). Furthermore, they again fail to mention information that contradicts their hypothesis (including information in some of the very references they cite): the incidence of Lyme The fi rst ALSUntangled, published in 2009, reviewed the possibility of a link between ALS and Lyme disease (1). We found no evidence for an increased frequency of positive Lyme tests in our cohort of 4000 patients with confi rmed diagnoses of ALS. We found no evidence that any of the patients in our cohort with a positive Lyme test had their ALS cured by appropriate treatment for Lyme disease. Nonetheless, rumours of a connection have persisted and a number of “ Lyme literate ” clinics continue to advertise their controversial testing and treatments for patients with ALS (PALS). One source of these persistent rumours appears to be an online manuscript called “ When ALS Is Lyme ” written by Sarah and John Vaughter (2) and available on their marketing website (3). Here, on behalf of PALS who requested it, we review this manuscript.