Discrepancies Between Objective and Subjective Outcomes of and Quality of Life During Molding Helmet Therapy for Cranial Deformities

Anne Neumeister,Susanne Brand,Franziska Koch,Sophie Kubon,Peter Baumgarten,Christian Senft,Falko Schwarz,Denise Löschner
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000010477
2024-07-19
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Abstract:Positional skull deformities have been on the rise for decades and can be treated with molding helmets in early childhood. Parents often fear later cosmetic stigmatization, but also a reduced quality of life (QoL) during treatment. The aim of this study was to examine therapy results in our patient collection from a new perspective. Cranial vault asymmetry (CVA), cranial vault asymmetry index (CVAI), and cranial index (CI) were compared before and after molding helmet therapy. Correction was defined by a decrease in CVA <3.5 mm and CI <90%. Subjective therapy outcome, side effects and QoL from the parents’ perspective were determined using a questionnaire. There were 25 patients included. Differences between pretherapeutic and posttherapeutic CVA, CVAI, and CI were significant ( P <0.01). An objective correction according to the defined values was observed in only 12% of cases. However, 76% of parents stated that their child’s skull shape was normal after therapy. There were 60 side effects reported in 23 cases. The QoL of 21 children was assessed as unimpaired during helmet therapy. Even though complete normalization was rarely observed, the parameters were significantly different after therapy, and subjective reduction in skull deformity was common.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?