Abstract:Shifting levels of E proteins and Id factors are pivotal in T cell commitment and differentiation, both in the thymus and in the periphery. Id2 and Id3 are two different factors that prevent E proteins from binding to their target gene cis-regulatory sequences and inducing gene expression. Although they use the same mechanism to suppress E protein activity, Id2 and Id3 play very different roles in T cell development and CD4 T cell differentiation. Id2 imposes an irreversible choice in early T cell precursors between innate and adaptive lineages, which can be thought of as a railway switch that directs T cells down one path or another. By contrast, Id3 acts in a transient fashion downstream of extracellular signals such as T cell receptor (TCR) signaling. TCR-dependent Id3 upregulation results in the dislodging of E proteins from their target sites while chromatin remodeling occurs. After the cessation of Id3 expression, E proteins can reassemble in the context of a new genomic landscape and molecular context that allows induction of different E protein target genes. To describe this mode of action, we have developed the "Clutch" model of differentiation. In this model, Id3 upregulation in response to TCR signaling acts as a clutch that stops E protein activity ("clutch in") long enough to allow shifting of the genomic landscape into a different "gear", resulting in accessibility to different E protein target genes once Id3 decreases ("clutch out") and E proteins can form new complexes on the DNA. While TCR signal strength and cytokine signaling play a role in both peripheral and thymic lineage decisions, the remodeling of chromatin and E protein target genes appears to be more heavily influenced by the cytokine milieu in the periphery, whereas the outcome of Id3 activity during T cell development in the thymus appears to depend more on the TCR signal strength. Thus, while the Clutch model applies to both CD4 T cell differentiation and T cell developmental transitions within the thymus, changes in chromatin accessibility are modulated by biased inputs in these different environments. New emerging technologies should enable a better understanding of the molecular events that happen during these transitions, and how they fit into the gene regulatory networks that drive T cell development and differentiation.

Dynamic changes in E-protein activity regulate T reg cell development

Lineage Tracking the Generation of T Regulatory Cells From Microbial Activated T Effector Cells in Naive Mice

Shifting gears: Id3 enables recruitment of E proteins to new targets during T cell development and differentiation

Id Proteins Suppress E2A-driven Innate-Like T Cell Development Prior to TCR Selection

Id Proteins Suppress E2A-Driven Invariant Natural Killer T Cell Development Prior to TCR Selection

T Cell Signaling Targets for Enhancing Regulatory or Effector Function.

Dynamic Foxp3-chromatin Interaction Controls Tunable Treg Cell Function.

E protein control of NKγδT cell development through both generation and function of the stereotypic Vγ1Vδ6.3 TCR

Id1 expression promotes T regulatory cell differentiation by facilitating TCR costimulation.

A critical function for TGF-β signaling in the development of natural CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells

Inhibition of E Protein Activity Facilitates the Quiescence Exit of Naïve CD4+ T Cells Through Modulating PI3K-AKT Signaling and TCR Microcluster Formation.

Single-cell deletion analyses show control of pro-T cell developmental speed and pathways by Tcf7, Spi1, Gata3, Bcl11a, Erg, and Bcl11b

T cell receptor signaling controls Foxp3 expression via PI3K, Akt, and mTOR

Id1 Expression Promotes Peripheral Cd4(+) T Cell Proliferation and Survival Upon Tcr Activation Without Co-Stimulation

Id1 expression in CD4 T cells promotes differentiation and function of follicular helper T cells and upregulation of related functional molecules

ER stress and its PERK branch enhance TCR-induced activation in regulatory T cells

A Dynamic Dual Role of IL-2 Signaling in the Two-Step Differentiation Process of Adaptive Regulatory T Cells

Histone Methylation Mediates Plasticity of Human Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells by Modulating Signature Gene Expressions

Transcription Factors Foxo3a and Foxo1 Couple the E3 Ligase Cbl-b to the Induction of Foxp3 Expression in Induced Regulatory T Cells

Foxp3 Enhancers Synergize to Maximize Regulatory T Cell Suppressive Capacity.

Retinoic Acid, IL-2 and TGF-β can Rapidly Induce Naïve Human CD4+ Cells to Become CD25+Foxp3+ Regulatory Cells with Protective Activity in vivo