Observation of energy-resolved many-body localization

Qiujiang Guo,Chen Cheng,Zheng-Hang Sun,Zixuan Song,Hekang Li,Zhen Wang,Wenhui Ren,Hang Dong,Dongning Zheng,Yu-Ran Zhang,Rubem Mondaini,Heng Fan,H. Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-1035-1

IF: 19.684

2020-09-21

Nature Physics

Abstract:Many-body localization (MBL) describes a quantum phase where an isolated interacting system subject to sufficient disorder displays non-ergodic behaviour, evading thermal equilibrium that occurs under its own dynamics. Previously, the thermalization–MBL transition has been largely characterized with the growth of disorder. Here, we explore a new axis, reporting on an energy-resolved MBL transition using a 19-qubit programmable superconducting processor, which enables precise control and flexibility of both disorder strength and initial state preparation. We observe that the onset of localization occurs at different disorder strengths, with distinguishable energy scales, by measuring time-evolved observables and quantities related to many-body wave functions. Our results open avenues for the experimental exploration of many-body mobility edges in MBL systems, whose existence is widely debated due to the finiteness of the system size, and where exact simulations in classical computers become unfeasible.

physics, multidisciplinary

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the influence of system energy on the localization transition in the Many - Body Localization (MBL) phenomenon. Specifically, the researchers used a 19 - qubit programmable superconducting processor to explore the transition process of the system from thermalization to localization as the disorder strength changes at different energy densities. This not only helps to understand the essence of the MBL phenomenon, but also may provide new insights for the development of quantum information storage technology.

### Research Background
Many - Body Localization describes that under a sufficiently strong disorder effect, an isolated interacting system exhibits non - ergodic behavior and avoids thermal equilibrium under its own dynamics. Previous studies mainly focused on characterizing the thermalization - localization transition by increasing the disorder strength. However, the influence of system energy on localization has not been fully explored.

### Research Methods
The researchers utilized a 19 - qubit superconducting processor to precisely control the disorder strength and the preparation of the initial state, thereby being able to directly detect the energy - disorder phase diagram of the many - body localization phase transition. In the experiment, by measuring observables after time evolution (such as the generalized imbalance), the researchers observed the localization behavior at different energy densities.

### Main Findings
1. **Energy - Dependent Localization**: The study found that the starting point of localization depends not only on the disorder strength but also on the energy density of the system. At the same disorder strength, systems with different energy densities can exhibit different behaviors.
2. **Measurement of Generalized Imbalance**: By measuring the generalized imbalance \(I_{\text{gen}}\), the researchers were able to quantify the system's ability to retain the initial state information during the time - evolution process.
3. **Participation Ratio and Quantum Fisher Information**: The researchers also measured the Participation Ratio (PR) and the Quantum Fisher Information (\(F_Q\)), these quantities reflect the distribution of the wave function in Hilbert space and the growth of the entanglement entropy.

### Formula Explanation
- **Hamiltonian**:
\[
H=\sum_{\langle m, n\rangle} J_{mn}(\sigma_m^+ \sigma_n^-+\sigma_m^- \sigma_n^+)+\sum_m V_m \sigma_m^z
\]
where \(\sigma_m^+\) and \(\sigma_m^-\) are the raising and lowering operators of the \(m\)-th qubit respectively, \(J_{mn}\) is the coupling strength between qubits, and \(V_m\) is the disorder potential of the \(m\)-th qubit.

- **Generalized Imbalance**:
\[
I_{\text{gen}}=\sum_{m = 1}^{19}\beta_m\sigma_m^z
\]
where \(\beta_m = 1/N_1\) (if the \(m\)-th qubit is initialized as \(|1\rangle\)) or \(\beta_m=- 1/N_0\) (if the \(m\)-th qubit is initialized as \(|0\rangle\)), \(N_1 = 9\) and \(N_0 = 10\) represent the number of qubits initialized as \(|1\rangle\) and \(|0\rangle\) respectively.

- **Participation Ratio**:
\[
\text{PR}=\left(\sum_n p_n(t)^2\right)^{-1}
\]
where \(p_n(t)=|\langle n|\Psi(t)\rangle|^2\) represents the probability of the \(n\)-th Fock state.

- **Quantum Fisher Information**:
\[
F_Q(t)=4\left(\langle I_{\text{gen}}^2(t)\rangle-\langle I_{\text{gen}}(t)\rangle^2\right)