Cardiovascular disease risk communication and prevention: a meta-analysis

Mina Bakhit,Samantha Fien,Eman Abukmail,Mark Jones,Justin Clark,Anna Mae Scott,Paul Glasziou,Magnolia Cardona

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae002

IF: 39.3

2024-01-22

European Heart Journal

Abstract:Knowledge of quantifiable cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk may improve health outcomes and trigger behavioural change in patients or clinicians. This review aimed to investigate the impact of CVD risk communication on patient-perceived CVD risk and changes in CVD risk factors. PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO databases were searched from inception to 6 June 2023, supplemented by citation analysis. Randomized trials that compared any CVD risk communication strategy versus usual care were included. Paired reviewers independently screened the identified records and extracted the data; disagreements were resolved by a third author. The primary outcome was the accuracy of risk perception. Secondary outcomes were clinician-reported changes in CVD risk, psychological responses, intention to modify lifestyle, and self-reported changes in risk factors and clinician prescribing of preventive medicines. Sixty-two trials were included. Accuracy of risk perception was higher among intervention participants (odds ratio = 2.31, 95% confidence interval = 1.63 to 3.27). A statistically significant improvement in overall CVD risk scores was found at 6–12 months (mean difference = −0.27, 95% confidence interval = −0.45 to −0.09). For primary prevention, risk communication significantly increased self-reported dietary modification (odds ratio = 1.50, 95% confidence interval = 1.21 to 1.86) with no increase in intention or actual changes in smoking cessation or physical activity. A significant impact on patients' intention to start preventive medication was found for primary and secondary prevention, with changes at follow-up for the primary prevention group. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, communicating CVD risk information, regardless of the method, reduced the overall risk factors and enhanced patients' self-perceived risk. Communication of CVD risk to patients should be considered in routine consultations. The impact of cardiovascular disease risk communication on primary and secondary prevention measures compared to usual care. CVD, cardiovascular disease; MD, mean difference; OR, odds ratio. *Actual changes.

cardiac & cardiovascular systems

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to address the impact of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk communication on patients' perceived risk, actual risk factor changes, psychological responses, and self-reported behaviors. Specifically, the study aims to explore the following aspects:

1. **Accuracy of Patients' Perceived Risk**: The study focuses on whether communicating cardiovascular disease risk information can improve patients' accurate perception of their own cardiovascular disease risk.
2. **Actual Changes in Cardiovascular Risk Factors**: The study also examines whether risk communication can lead to actual improvements in patients' cardiovascular risk factors.
3. **Psychological Responses**: The study evaluates patients' psychological responses after receiving risk information, such as decision conflict.
4. **Self-Reported Behavior Changes**: The study analyzes whether risk communication encourages patients to make lifestyle changes, such as dietary habits, exercise, or smoking cessation.

Additionally, the paper explores the impact of cardiovascular disease risk knowledge on clinical doctors' prescribing behaviors. Overall, the study finds that regardless of the method used for cardiovascular disease risk communication, it can improve the accuracy of patients' risk perception and reduce cardiovascular risk factors to some extent. Therefore, the study suggests that cardiovascular disease risk communication strategies should be considered in routine medical consultations.