Why is Time Different from Other Dimensions?
Ping AO
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1360/n972017-00997
2018-01-01
Abstract:Through the development of fundamental equation of motion in physics,from Aristotle,via Newton and Einstein,to present,it is clear that time is a special dimension.Currently there are three fundamental dynamical frameworks after Newton's classical mechanics:(special) relativistic mechanics,quantum mechanics and evolution mechanics.Each has brought a fundamental constant into physics:speed of light in vacuum c,Planck constant h,and Boltzmann constant k.At present there is no valid empirical evidence against the predictions from each of three fundamental mechanics.In this sense all three of them can be regarded as "universal dynamics".Each has also brought a limit on our quantitative description of Nature:invariance of light speed,uncertainty principle,and irreversibility.Two of those limits are explicitly related to time:the invariance of light speed and irreversibility;one is implicitly related to time:due to the uncertainty principle reversible quantum paths exist during a quantum process.In both quantum mechanics and evolution mechanics the time is of essentially of Newtonian type,though latter has explicitly embedded irreversibility as adopted from "the second law" of thermodynamics,because "the second law" is it's a special limit.In relativistic mechanics,though time and space can be transformed into each other,nevertheless such transformation is not arbitrary.Time ordering still has a strong physical meaning—specifically space-like,time-like,and light-like events are invariant under space-time transformation.Time may ultimately be related to an essential structure in Nature:causality,which we are far from a complete understanding.Similar to general relativity breaks down the philosophical belief of a prior or transcendental concept of space and time,it may be likely we are going to break another generally beholding concept of causal relation as a human construction,and time is "real".It is evident that we may be in the same position as physics before 1905:a profound conceptual consistent problem exists among those three fundamental mechanics.Maybe a unification of current three fundamental dynamical frameworks is a best route to gain deeper assessment on time and through a light on the consistent problem.Before such grand vision may be realized,there are a few smaller goals which appear within our immediately experimental exploration ability.The one-to-three classification of relativistic mechanics,quantum mechanics and evolution mechanics requires us to test its new experimental predictions,particularly those from evolution mechanics.Indeed,evolution mechanics predicts the existence of a new mathematical structure on stochastic integration,beyond the usual Ito and Stratonovich integration.In a small manner this choice of mathematical structure for stochastic processes in physics is similar to that of Euclidean vs.Riemannian geometry.Also,evolution mechanics predicts the existence of a relationship between the friction matrix and diffusion matrix as the accompanying property of the existence of Boltzmann-Gibbs distribution function.This relationship is an extension of the Einstein relation to nonlinear regime without detailed balance—a surprising simple relation.