Abstract:Purpose: Patients with X-linked hypophosphatemic rickets (XLH) often develop coronal plane knee deformities despite medical treatment. Hemiepiphysiodesis is an effective way to correct coronal plane knee deformities in skeletally immature patients, but a full understanding of the rate of angular correction after hemiepiphysiodesis in XLH patients, compared with idiopathic cases is lacking. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed charts of 24 XLH patients and 37 control patients without metabolic bone disease who underwent hemiepiphysiodesis. All patients were treated with standard-of-care medical therapy (SOC=active vitamin D and phosphate salt supplementation) in our clinical research center and had a minimum of 2-year follow-up after hemiepiphysiodesis. Demographic data as well as complications, repeat procedures, or recurrence/overcorrection were recorded. Standing lower extremity radiographs were evaluated before the surgical intervention and at subsequent hardware removal or skeletal maturity, whichever came first. Mean axis deviation, knee zone, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), and medial proximal tibial angle were measured on each radiograph. The rate of angular correction was calculated as the change in mLDFA and medial proximal tibial angle over the duration of treatment. Results: The magnitude of the initial deformity of the distal femur was greater in XLH patients as compared with control for varus (XLH mLDFA 97.7 +/- 4.9 vs. Control mLDFA 92.0 +/- 2.0 degrees) and valgus (XLH mLDFA 78.7 +/- 6.2 vs. Controls mLDFA 83.6 +/- 3.2 degrees). The rate of correction was dependent on age. When correcting for age, XLH patients corrected femoral deformity at a 15% to 36% slower rate than control patients for the mLDFA (>3 y growth remaining XLH 0.71 +/- 0.46 vs. control 0.84 +/- 0.27 degrees/month, <3 y growth remaining XLH 0.37 +/- 0.33 vs. control 0.58 +/- 0.41 degrees/month). No significant differences were seen in the rate of proximal tibia correction. XLH patients were less likely to end treatment in zone 1 (55.0% XLH vs. 77.8% control). XLH patients had longer treatment times than controls (19.5 +/- 10.7 vs. 12.6 +/- 7.0 mu, P value <0.001), a higher average number of secondary procedures than controls (1.33 +/- 1.44 vs. 0.62 +/- 0.92 number of procedures), a higher rate of overcorrection than controls (29.2% vs. 5.4%), and a higher rate of subsequent corrective osteotomy than controls (37.5% vs. 8.1%). There was no significant difference in the rate of complications between groups (8.3% vs. 5.4%). Conclusions: Patients with XLH undergoing hemiepiphysiodesis have a 15% to 36% slower rate of femoral deformity correction that results in longer treatment times, a higher likelihood to undergo more secondary procedures, and a lower likelihood to reach neutral mechanical alignment. Significance: This study provides important information to guide the timing and treatment of patients with XLH and coronal plane knee deformities. In addition, results from this study can be educational for families and patients with respect to anticipated treatment times, success rates of the procedure, complication rate, and likelihood of needing repeat procedures.

Hemiepiphysiodesis for Genu Valgum in Patients With Multiple Hereditary Exostoses

Potential influence of factors for genu valgus with hereditary multiple exostoses

Developmental pattern of the hip in patients with hereditary multiple exostoses

Predicting Rates of Angular Correction After Hemiepiphysiodesis in Patients With X-Linked Hypophosphatemic Rickets

Valgus Osteotomy in Combination with Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation for Fibrous Dysplasia with Shepherd’s Crook Deformity

Ulnar lengthening for children with forearm deformity from hereditary multiple exostoses: a retrospective study from a tertiary medical center

Factors Affecting Postoperative Courses After Removal of Transphyseal Screws Inserted for Correction of Genu Valgum

Research Progress in Hereditary Multiple Exostoses

Antegrade femoral lengthening and simultaneous hemiepiphysiodesis for congenital femoral deficiency

Hinge Positioning Method of Ilizarov Apparatus in Correcting Radial Head Luxation Caused by Multiple Hereditary Exostoses

Hereditary Multiple Exostoses-A Review of the Molecular Background, Diagnostics, and Potential Therapeutic Strategies

Transphyseal Hemiepiphysiodesis: Is it Truly Reversible?

A Rare Case of Hereditary Multiple Exostoses in a Woman

The Effectiveness of Temporary Hemiepiphysiodesis for Non‐idiopathic Coronal Angular Deformity of the Knee in Children: A Comparison of Hinge Eight‐Plate and Traditional Eight‐Plate

Identification of risk factors affecting bone formation in gradual ulnar lengthening in children with hereditary multiple exostoses: A retrospective study

Peroneal Nerve Decompression in Patients with Multiple Hereditary Exostoses

A Long-Term Follow-Up Study of High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Compartment Osteoarthrosis.

Do Patient Sex and Age Affect Hemiepiphysiodesis Outcomes?

Is there a place for dorsal hemiepiphysiodesis of the first metatarsal in the treatment of pes cavovarus?

Clinical and Imaging Observation of Hereditary Multiple Exostosis

Complete Correction following Temporary Hemiepiphysiodesis using 2-hole Reconstruction Plates among Skeletally Immature Patients with Angular Deformities around Knees: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study