Knowledge, attitude, and practices of restaurant and foodservice personnel in food allergy. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ximena A Figueroa-Gómez,María Jesús Oliveras-López,Marcelo F Poyanco-Bugueño,Francisco M Ocaña-Peinado,Herminia López-García de la Serrana,Magdalena Araya Quezada
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33431
IF: 3.776
2024-06-24
Heliyon
Abstract:Background: Currently, there may be 240-250 million people worldwide affected by food allergies. Dining out can be challenging for individuals with food allergies who rely on restaurant and food service staff to properly prepare allergen-free meals. For this reason, the personnel working in restaurants and other food services play a significant role in managing the risks faced by customers with food allergies. Objectives: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to assess the existing evidence concerning the knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to food allergies among restaurant and foodservice personnel. Methods: To identify, characterize, and synthesize published research on the prevalence of positive responses regarding knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to food allergies among restaurant and food service personnel, international recommendations for systematic reviews and PRISMA guidelines were followed. The search was conducted between January 2012 and January 2022, utilizing the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library. Selection and data extraction were carried out following predefined protocols, and constructs based on reported outcomes were generated and subsequently analyzed in the meta-analysis. Trials were evaluated using the Cochrane tool for risk of bias. The results are presented using summary tables, forest plots, and box plots, showcasing the combined proportion of constructs obtained from independent surveys conducted without control groups. These constructs were then grouped into categories as an organizational framework and analyzed to determine their distribution among quintiles, aiming to provide a detailed overview of data variability. This strategy allowed us to demonstrate how results from the analyzed categories were distributed. Results: The algorithm identified 23 relevant studies, primarily originating from the United States and Europe. The main observed variability was related to the evaluated populations and the instruments used. A total of 28 constructs were identified, with 10 related to knowledge, 9 to attitudes, and 9 to practices. A proportion meta-analysis was conducted to determine the prevalence of positive responses within these three study categories. The results obtained reveal that, in the knowledge category, quintiles 4 and 5 exhibit strong knowledge on the subject (over 84 %). In contrast, starting from quintile 2, the majority of participants shows a positive attitude toward catering to consumers with food allergies (over 85 %). However, after examining the practices category, responses belonging to quintile 5 reflect a low level of risk, while in the other quintiles, behaviors with a higher potential risk for consumers with food allergies are identified. Conclusions: The knowledge, attitudes, and practices of personnel in the food service sector are crucial due to the increasing prevalence of food allergies today, as well as the growing frequency of eating out. Knowledge is the most extensively studied category, showing generally acceptable but still insufficient levels in some areas. Positive attitudes are expressed towards individuals disclosing allergic conditions, yet they do not necessarily correlate with high levels of knowledge. The identified practices do not ensure the safety of the dish served to the customer. There is limited awareness regarding the importance of preventing acute allergic reactions at the time of food consumption. Restaurants and food services should train all staff involved in customer service, implement protocols aimed at preventing allergic reactions during food service, and establish guidelines for handling a customer experiencing an acute reaction.The limitations of this research are related to the heterogeneity present in the synthesized results, urging caution when interpreting the overall estimate of the combined effect, as the findings may not be applicable to all populations or study settings. Indeed, more studies are needed to enhance result precision and provide more specific recommendations for catering to allergic customers in restaurants and food services.