Exogenous application of melatonin protects bean and tobacco plants against ozone damage by improving antioxidant enzyme activities, enhancing photosynthetic performance, and preventing membrane damage

Vasiliki Vougeleka,Samuele Risoli,Costas Saitanis,Evgenios Agathokleous,Georgia Ntatsi,Giacomo Lorenzini,Cristina Nali,Elisa Pellegrini,Claudia Pisuttu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.123180

IF: 8.9

2024-01-05

Environmental Pollution

Abstract:Ozone (O 3 ) pollution is harmful to plants and ecosystems. Several chemicals have been evaluated to protect plants against O 3 deleterious effects. However, they are not adequately efficient and/or the environmental safety of their application is questioned. Hence, new chemicals that provide sufficient protection while being safer for environmental application are needed. This study investigates the response of two O 3 -sensitive plant species ( Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Pinto and Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Bel-W3) leaf-sprayed with deionized water (W, control), ethylenediurea (EDU, 1 mM) or melatonin at lower (1 mM) or higher (3 mM) concentrations (Mel_L and Mel_H, respectively), and then exposed to a square wave of 200 ppb O 3 , lasting 1 day (5 h day −1 ) for bean and 2 days (8 h day −1 ) for tobacco. In both species, the photosynthetic activity of O 3 -exposed plants was about halved. O 3 -induced membrane damage was also confirmed by increased malondialdehyde (MDA) byproducts compared to control (W). In EDU- and Mel-treated bean plants, the photosynthetic performance was not influenced by O 3 , leading to reduction of the incidence and severity of O 3 visible injury. In bean plants, Mel_L mitigated the detrimental effect of O 3 by boosting antioxidant enzyme activities or osmoprotectants (e.g. abscisic acid, proline, and glutathione transferase). In Mel_L-sprayed tobacco plants, O 3 negatively influenced the photosynthetic activity. Conversely, Mel_H ameliorated the O 3 -induced oxidative stress by preserving the photosynthetic performance, preventing membrane damage, and reducing the visible injuries extent. Although EDU performed better, melatonin protected plants against O 3 phytotoxicity, suggesting its potential application as a bio-safer and eco-friendlier phytoprotectant against O 3 . It is worth noting that the content of melatonin in EDU-treated plants remained unchanged, indicating that the protectant mode of action of EDU is not Mel-related.

environmental sciences