Abstract:For the period from 1973 to the end of 1986, 70,656 data sets on occupational preventive medical examinations in employees exposed occupationally to asbestos dust (G 1.2) were made available to us by the Central Registry for Employees Exposed to Asbestos Dust (ZAS). On the basis of this data, an analysis of asbestosis risk was to be made in relation to specific areas of work, taking into consideration the beginning and duration of exposure. Proceedings for declaratory appraisal in accordance with occupational disease no. 4103 were instituted in 1760 cases in the report period. In accordance with the character of the available data, the X-ray findings in the lungs were available from the persons investigated as parameters of possible asbestosis risk on the basis of coding consistent with the International Pneumoconiosis Classification (ILO U/C 1971 and/or ILO 1980 West Germany). The major result of the statistical analyses on the mainframe macrocomputer of the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg was that the relatively highest risk of asbestosis was present in persons whose exposure began before 1955. On the other hand, with increasing duration of exposure, an unequivocal rise of the asbestosis risk could not be detected on the basis of the overall population. In relation to the individual fields of work, the relatively highest risk of asbestosis was shown to be in the asbestos textile and paper industry, as well as in the asbestos cement industry. No detectable risk of asbestosis was present in the fields of mining, traffic and health service and for women in the industrial sectors of building material, gas and water, catering trade, building, commerce as well as banking and insurance. Accordingly, it can be assumed that certain fields of work are or were exposed to such a small extent or not at all that a risk of asbestosis which is relevant in terms of occupational medicine is no longer to be assumed or was not to be assumed. This applies above all to certain work in the frictional coating (brake lining) and asbestos paper industry. Furthermore, the analysis of the data material did not provide any unequivocal indications that inhalative smoking habits have a negative effect on the risk of asbestosis. In principle, it can be stated that the occupational preventive medical investigations according to G 1.2 are effective.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Occupational exposure to cement dust: changing opinions of a respiratory hazard

Occupational lung disease--past record and future trend using the asbestos case as an example.

Silicosis and industrial bronchitis by exposure to silica powders and cement

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease due to occupational exposure to silica dust: a review of epidemiological and pathological evidence

The impact of coal mine dust characteristics on pathways to respiratory harm: investigating the pneumoconiotic potency of coals

Dust diseases and the legacy of corporate manipulation of science and law

Update on respiratory disease from coal mine and silica dust

Airway disease in highway and tunnel construction workers exposed to silica

Coal Mine Dust Lung Disease. New Lessons from an Old Exposure

Dust concentrations and respiratory risks in coalminers: key risk estimates from the British Pneumoconiosis Field Research

Coal mine dust lung disease. New lessons from old exposure

[Effects on the lung due to underground coal mining work]

Lung Disease Caused by Exposure to Coal Mine and Silica Dust

Cumulative exposure to dust causes accelerated decline in lung function in tunnel workers

Asbestos and disease – a public health success story?

[A Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies on Cancer Mortality among Workers Exposure to Chrysotile Fiber Alone].

Coal mine dust lung disease in the modern era

Silica‐associated lung disease: An old‐world exposure in modern industries

Mortality among dust-exposed Chinese mine and pottery workers.

Health hazards from fine asbestos dusts. An analysis of 70,656 occupational preventive medical investigations from 1973 to the end of 1986

Prevention of the Occupational Silicosis Epidemic in Australia: What Do Those Who Assess Workplace Health Risk Think Should Be Done Now?