Abstract:There is a clinical need for osteochondral scaffolds with complex geometries for restoring articulating joint surfaces. To address that need, 3D‐printing has enabled scaffolds to be created with anatomically shaped geometries and interconnected internal architectures, going beyond simple plug‐shaped scaffolds that are limited to small, cylindrical, focal defects. A key challenge for restoring articulating joint surfaces with 3D‐printed constructs is the mechanical loading environment, particularly to withstand delamination or mechanical failure. Although the mechanical performance of interfacial scaffolds is essential, interface strength testing has rarely been emphasized in prior studies with stratified scaffolds. In the pioneering studies where interface strength was assessed, varying methods were employed, which has made direct comparisons difficult. Therefore, the current review focused on 3D‐printed scaffolds for osteochondral applications with an emphasis on interface integration and biomechanical evaluation. This 3D‐printing focus included both multiphasic cylindrical scaffolds and anatomically shaped scaffolds. Combinations of different 3D‐printing methods (e.g., fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, bioprinting with pneumatic extrusion of cell‐laden hydrogels) have been employed in a handful of studies to integrate osteoinductive and chondroinductive regions into a single scaffold. Most 3D‐printed multiphasic structures utilized either an interdigitating or a mechanical interlocking design to strengthen the construct interface and to prevent delamination during function. The most effective approach to combine phases may be to infill a robust 3D‐printed osteal polymer with an interlocking chondral phase hydrogel. Mechanical interlocking is therefore recommended for scaling up multiphasic scaffold applications to larger anatomically shaped joint surface regeneration. For the evaluation of layer integration, the interface shear test is recommended to avoid artifacts or variability that may be associated with alternative approaches that require adhesives or mechanical grips. The 3D‐printing literature with interfacial scaffolds provides a compelling foundation for continued work toward successful regeneration of injured or diseased osteochondral tissues in load‐bearing joints such as the knee, hip, or temporomandibular joint.

Development of novel three-dimensional printed scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration

3D Printing of Biomimetic Multi-Layered GelMA/nHA Scaffold for Osteochondral Defect Repair

Cryogenic 3D printing of heterogeneous scaffolds with gradient mechanical strengths and spatial delivery of osteogenic peptide/TGF-β1 for osteochondral tissue regeneration.

3D-printed biomimetic scaffolds with precisely controlled and tunable structures guide cell migration and promote regeneration of osteochondral defect

3D Bioprinting of Biomimetic Bilayered Scaffold Consisting of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix and Silk Fibroin for Osteochondral Repair

Biomimetic Design and Fabrication of Multilayered Osteochondral Scaffolds by Low-Temperature Deposition Manufacturing and Thermal-Induced Phase-Separation Techniques

Patient-specific Scaffolds with a Biomimetic Gradient Environment for Articular Cartilage-Subchondral Bone Regeneration.

3D-Printed Scaffolds with Calcified Layer for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering

Osteochondral Regeneration With Anatomical Scaffold 3D‐Printing—Design Considerations for Interface Integration

3D Bioprinting Dual-Factor Releasing and Gradient-Structured Constructs Ready to Implant for Anisotropic Cartilage Regeneration

3D Niche-Inspired Scaffolds as a Stem Cell Delivery System for the Regeneration of the Osteochondral Interface

Enhanced Osteochondral Regeneration with a 3D-Printed Biomimetic Scaffold Featuring a Calcified Interfacial Layer

3D bioprinting of multicellular scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration

3D Bio-Printed Biphasic Scaffolds with Dual Modification of Silk Fibroin for the Integrated Repair of Osteochondral Defects.

Fabrication of 3D Bioprinted Bi-Phasic Scaffold for Bone–Cartilage Interface Regeneration

Development of Tri‐Layered Biomimetic Atelocollagen Scaffolds with Interfaces for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering

Three‐dimensional Bioprinting Biphasic Multicellular Living Scaffold Facilitates Osteochondral Defect Regeneration

3D Bio-Printing of CS/Gel/HA/Gr Hybrid Osteochondral Scaffolds

Rapid Customization of Biomimetic Cartilage Scaffold with Stem Cell Capturing and Homing Capabilities for In Situ Inductive Regeneration of Osteochondral Defects

Osteochondral Regeneration with 3D-Printed Biodegradable High-Strength Supramolecular Polymer Reinforced-Gelatin Hydrogel Scaffolds

Bilayered scaffold with 3D printed stiff subchondral bony compartment to provide constant mechanical support for long-term cartilage regeneration