Abstract:Large observational databases are often subject to missing data. As such, methods for causal inference must simultaneously handle confounding and missingness; surprisingly little work has been done at this intersection. Motivated by this, we propose an efficient and robust estimator of the causal average treatment effect from cohort studies when confounders are missing at random. The approach is based on a novel factorization of the likelihood that, unlike alternative methods, facilitates flexible modelling of nuisance functions (e.g., with state‐of‐the‐art machine learning methods) while maintaining nominal convergence rates of the final estimators. Simulated data, derived from an electronic health record‐based study of the long‐term effects of bariatric surgery on weight outcomes, verify the robustness properties of the proposed estimators in finite samples. Our approach may serve as a theoretical benchmark against which ad hoc methods may be assessed. Résumé Les grandes bases de données observationnelles sont souvent confrontées au problème des données manquantes. De ce fait, les méthodes d'inférence causale doivent gérer à la fois les facteurs de confusion et les données manquantes, un domaine étonnamment peu exploré. Pour répondre à ce défi, les auteurs de cet article proposent un estimateur efficace et robuste de l'effet causal moyen du traitement. Cet estimateur est spécialement conçu pour les études de cohortes où les facteurs de confusion sont manquants de manière aléatoire. L'approche proposée s'appuie sur une nouvelle factorisation de la vraisemblance. Contrairement à d'autres méthodes, celle‐ci permet de modéliser les fonctions de nuisance de manière flexible, notamment grâce à des techniques avancées d'apprentissage automatique, et ce tout en maintenant les taux de convergence attendus des estimateurs finaux. Des simulations basées sur des dossiers médicaux électroniques concernant les effets à long terme de la chirurgie bariatrique sur le poids confirment la robustesse des estimateurs dans des échantillons finis. Cette approche pourrait servir de référence théorique pour évaluer d'autres méthodes ad‐hoc.

Coarsened confounding for causal effects: a large-sample framework

Relaxed covariate overlap and margin-based causal effect estimation

Estimating individual treatment effect: generalization bounds and algorithms

A robust and efficient approach to causal inference based on sparse sufficient dimension reduction

Sufficient dimension reduction for average causal effect estimation

Causal Inference with High-dimensional Discrete Covariates

Detecting and Measuring Confounding Using Causal Mechanism Shifts

Using Standard Tools from Finite Population Sampling to Improve Causal Inference for Complex Experiments

Doubly Robust Inference in Causal Latent Factor Models

Combining multiple observational data sources to estimate causal effects

Approximate Causal Effect Identification under Weak Confounding

A General Causal Inference Framework for Cross-Sectional Observational Data

Learning sources of variability from high-dimensional observational studies

Inference for Two-stage Experiments under Covariate-Adaptive Randomization

Causal Identification for Complex Functional Longitudinal Studies

Flexible sensitivity analysis for causal inference in observational studies subject to unmeasured confounding

Doubly Robust Proximal Causal Inference under Confounded Outcome-Dependent Sampling

Causal Inference With Noisy And Missing Covariates Via Matrix Factorization

Robust causal inference for point exposures with missing confounders

Observational Causality Testing

Valid causal inference with unobserved confounding in high-dimensional settings