Abstract:Algorithmic fairness of machine learning (ML) models has raised significant concern in the recent years. Many testing, verification, and bias mitigation techniques have been proposed to identify and reduce fairness issues in ML models. The existing methods are model-centric and designed to detect fairness issues under static settings. However, many ML-enabled systems operate in a dynamic environment where the predictive decisions made by the system impact the environment, which in turn affects future decision-making. Such a self-reinforcing feedback loop can cause fairness violations in the long term, even if the immediate outcomes are fair. In this paper, we propose a simulation-based framework called FairSense to detect and analyze long-term unfairness in ML-enabled systems. Given a fairness requirement, FairSense performs Monte-Carlo simulation to enumerate evolution traces for each system configuration. Then, FairSense performs sensitivity analysis on the space of possible configurations to understand the impact of design options and environmental factors on the long-term fairness of the system. We demonstrate FairSense's potential utility through three real-world case studies: Loan lending, opioids risk scoring, and predictive policing.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the fairness issues that may arise in machine learning (ML) systems during long - term operation. Although many existing fairness testing and verification techniques can identify and reduce fairness problems in static environments, in dynamic environments, since the system's predictive decisions can affect the environment and in turn affect future decisions, this self - reinforcing feedback loop may lead to long - term fairness violations, even if the immediate results are fair. ### Specific Problem Description 1. **Limitations of Existing Methods**: - Most of the existing fairness analysis methods are model - centered and assume that the environment is static. - These methods cannot capture the dynamic interactions between the system and the environment, especially the long - term unfairness that these interactions may cause. 2. **Long - Term Fairness Issues in Dynamic Environments**: - In dynamic environments, the system's predictive decisions will change the state of the environment, and these changes will affect future decisions. - For example, in a loan approval system, rejecting a loan may lower an individual's credit score, thereby further harming their chances of obtaining a loan in the future. - If not intervened, this self - reinforcing feedback loop may lead to discrimination against certain groups. ### Solution: The FAIRSENSE Framework To solve the above problems, the paper proposes a simulation - based framework, FAIRSENSE, for detecting and analyzing fairness issues in machine learning systems during long - term operation. Specifically: - **Input**: - System parameters: Describe configuration options (such as ML model types, agent strategies, etc.). - Fairness requirements: Define the desired fairness criteria. - Environment model: Describe the dynamic changes in the environment (such as changes in dataset distribution). - **Process**: - Use Monte Carlo simulation to generate the evolution trajectories of the system and the environment under different configurations. - Conduct sensitivity analysis on each trajectory to evaluate the impact of design options and environmental factors on long - term fairness. - **Output**: - Provide a ranking of the impact of system and environment parameters on long - term fairness, helping developers focus on the most important design decisions. - Analyze the trade - off between system utility and long - term fairness to assist developers in making better design choices. ### Case Studies To demonstrate the potential application value of FAIRSENSE, the paper verifies it through three practical cases: loan approval, opioid risk scoring, and predictive policing. These case studies show that FAIRSENSE can systematically analyze and understand the impact of design options on long - term fairness. ### Summary This paper aims to solve the fairness issues in dynamic environments that may occur in machine learning systems during long - term operation, and proposes a simulation - based framework, FAIRSENSE, to help developers identify and mitigate long - term fairness issues at the design stage.

FairSense: Long-Term Fairness Analysis of ML-Enabled Systems

A Simulation Based Dynamic Evaluation Framework for System-wide Algorithmic Fairness

Fairness Testing: A Comprehensive Survey and Analysis of Trends

FairLay-ML: Intuitive Remedies for Unfairness in Data-Driven Social-Critical Algorithms

The Fragility of Fairness: Causal Sensitivity Analysis for Fair Machine Learning

Long-Term Fairness Inquiries and Pursuits in Machine Learning: A Survey of Notions, Methods, and Challenges

Identifying, measuring, and mitigating individual unfairness for supervised learning models and application to credit risk models

Runtime Monitoring of Dynamic Fairness Properties

Statistical inference for individual fairness

Fairness in Machine Learning with Tractable Models

Hidden Technical Debts for Fair Machine Learning in Financial Services

Systemic Fairness

MBFair: a model-based verification methodology for detecting violations of individual fairness

A novel approach for assessing fairness in deployed machine learning algorithms

SimFair: Physics-Guided Fairness-Aware Learning with Simulation Models

Should Fairness be a Metric or a Model? A Model-based Framework for Assessing Bias in Machine Learning Pipelines

Towards Fair Machine Learning Software: Understanding and Addressing Model Bias Through Counterfactual Thinking

Predicting Fairness of ML Software Configurations

FairSight: Visual Analytics for Fairness in Decision Making

Adapting Static Fairness to Sequential Decision-Making: Bias Mitigation Strategies towards Equal Long-term Benefit Rate

Long-term Fairness For Real-time Decision Making: A Constrained Online Optimization Approach