Abstract:Although the field of entrepreneurship is recognized as being of fundamental importance for our economy, and although many researchers throughout the world have turned their attention to it, there is, as yet, no agreement as to the research object in this scientific field. Empirical research has described the phenomenon from different standpoints. It has also shown that the phenomenon is much more complex and heterogeneous than was thought in the 1980s. However, to advance knowledge and produce tools that are useful in practice, it has become necessary to establish theories that will generate more productive empirical research. Some effort at definition is therefore needed.The definition proposed here takes a constructivist stance, and is at the service of a research project—that of understanding or forecasting the entrepreneurial act and its success or failure, and defining more accurately the environmental conditions favourable to that act. Here, the scientific object studied in the field of entrepreneurship is the dialogic between individual and new value creation, within an ongoing process and within an environment that has specific characteristics. This definition emphasizes the fact that we will not understand the phenomenon of entrepreneurship if we do not consider the individual (the entrepreneur), the project, the environment and also the links between them over time. It shows the entrepreneur to be not simply a blind machine responding automatically to environmental stimuli (interest rates, subsidies, information networks, etc.), but a human being capable of creating, learning and influencing the environment.This standpoint is consistent with the practical work done by the people responsible for helping entrepreneurs throughout the entrepreneurial process. It also shows that the phenomenon is heterogeneous and hence that discourse which is too general in nature will produce only truisms or artifacts, and that it is dynamic and sometimes unpredictable. Clearly, it would be paradoxical to suggest that the phenomenon is predictable and therefore situated within a deterministic framework, while at the same time admitting that entrepreneurs have the freedom and capacity to create innovations.

Importing knowledge from psychology: how it broadens the scope of entrepreneurship research—and helps it avoid the "multi-tower effect"

Broaden the Pathway to Inclusive Entrepreneurship: A Transaction Cost Proposition

The impact of entrepreneurship research on other academic fields

The psychology of entrepreneurial performance—theoretical and applied: Robert A. Baron and Michael Frese, co-recipients of the 2024 Global Award for Entrepreneurship Research

The Theory of Knowledge Spillover Entrepreneurship

Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base

Entrepreneurial Regions: Do Macro-Psychological Cultural Characteristics of Regions Help Solve the “Knowledge Paradox” of Economics?

Integrating psychological approaches to entrepreneurship: the Entrepreneurial Personality System (EPS)

Psychological capital and entrepreneurship: A systematic literature review of a growing research agenda

Opening the black box of academic entrepreneurship: a bibliometric analysis

How do entrepreneurs influence their social environment? A bibliometric analysis and editorial

Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship

Unraveling the entrepreneurial mindset

Who becomes an entrepreneur? A 30-years-review of individual-level research

Organizational behavior and human resource management perspectives on entrepreneurship: Lessons learned and new directions

Entrepreneurship Knowledge: when East Meets West

A Market for Lemons? Strategic Directions for a Vigilant Application of Artificial Intelligence in Entrepreneurship Research

Explorers of the twenty-first century? A systematic literature review of the scholarship on international entrepreneurs from developed economies

Current Directions of Entrepreneurship Research in Social Psychology: a Map of the Scientific Landscape

The Importance of Context-Relevance: Entrepreneurial Personality Relates to Entrepreneurial Outcomes Beyond the HEXACO and Dark Triad

Not seeing the forest for the trees? A systems approach to the entrepreneurial university