Telemedicine for corneal disease in rural Nepal

Crandall E Peeler,Kavita Dhakhwa,Shahzad I Mian,Taylor Blachley,Sushila Patel,David C Musch,Maria A Woodward
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X14537769
Abstract:We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of slit-lamp photographs interpreted by telemedicine compared to a conventional clinical examination. A convenience sample of 21 patients with anterior segment disease was enrolled at the Lumbini Eye Institute (LEI) in Bhairahawa, Nepal. An ophthalmologist at the LEI examined each patient and assigned a diagnosis and follow-up interval; this represented the gold standard. An ophthalmic technician also obtained anterior segment photographs of each patient. Slit-lamp photographs and clinical histories were then uploaded to a server for access by three separate readers. These readers, one in Nepal and two in the US, provided a diagnosis and follow-up interval independently. The diagnostic agreement between the examiner and all readers was good (kappa = 0.75, P < 0.0001). The agreement regarding follow-up interval between the examiner and all readers was fair, with a kappa coefficient of 0.32 (P < 0.0001). However, the agreement was high when comparing the examiner with the reviewer in Nepal (kappa = 0.90) and was moderate when comparing the two US-based readers with each other (kappa = 0.45). In general, the ophthalmologists in Nepal recommended more rapid follow-up than their US-based counterparts. Our results suggest that the transmission of slit-lamp photographs from satellite clinics and eye health screening camps to the LEI and elsewhere for review and triage is an effective means of identifying anterior segment pathology.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?