Abstract:Understanding how a scientist develops new scientific collaborations or how their papers receive new citations is a major challenge in scientometrics. The approach being proposed simultaneously examines the growth processes of the co-authorship and citation networks by analyzing the evolutions of the rich get richer and the fit get richer phenomena. In particular, the preferential attachment function and author fitnesses, which govern the two phenomena, are estimated non-parametrically in each network. The approach is applied to the co-authorship and citation networks of the flagship journal of the strategic management scientific community, namely the Strategic Management Journal. The results suggest that the abovementioned phenomena have been consistently governing both temporal networks. The average of the attachment exponents in the co-authorship network is 0.30 while it is 0.29 in the citation network. This suggests that the rich get richer phenomenon has been weak in both networks. The right tails of the distributions of author fitness in both networks are heavy, which imply that the intrinsic scientific quality of each author has been playing a crucial role in getting new citations and new co-authorships. Since the total competitiveness in each temporal network is founded to be rising with time, it is getting harder to receive a new citation or to develop a new collaboration. Analyzing the average competency, it was found that on average, while the veterans tend to be more competent at developing new collaborations, the newcomers are likely better at acquiring new citations. Furthermore, the author fitness in both networks has been consistent with the history of the strategic management scientific community. This suggests that coupling node fitnesses throughout different networks might be a promising new direction in analyzing simultaneously multiple networks.

The scientometrics and reciprocality underlying co-authorship panels in Google Scholar profiles

The counting house: measuring those who count. Presence of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics in the Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley & Twitter

Building and Analyzing a Global Co-Authorship Network Using Google Scholar Data

The Academic Social Network

Author-level metrics in the new academic profile platforms: The online behaviour of the Bibliometrics community

Asymmetry of social interactions and its role in link predictability: the case of coauthorship networks

Understanding scientific collaboration: Homophily, transitivity, and preferential attachment

Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research

Socio-cognitive Networks between Researchers

The relationship between acquaintanceship and coauthorship in scientific collaboration networks

A novel method for depicting academic disciplines through Google Scholar Citations: The case of Bibliometrics

Examining Different Research Communities: Authorship Network

Social Capital and Individual Performance: A Study of Academic Collaboration

The Use of Google Scholar for Tenure and Promotion Decisions

The evolutions of the rich get richer and the fit get richer phenomena in scholarly networks: the case of the strategic management journal

Hyperauthored papers disproportionately amplify important egocentric network metrics

Google Scholar is manipulatable

Co-author weighting in bibliometric methodology and subfields of a scientific discipline

Investigating Scientific Collaboration Through the Sequence of Authors in the Publication Bylines and the Diversity of Collaborators.

Empirical Patterns in Google Scholar Citation Counts

Communities and Patterns of Scientific collaboration