Abstract:In a P300-based concealed information test (CIT), an increased response to a crime-related "probe" item of interest suggests concealed knowledge. Because the CIT's detection ability is based on knowledgeable parties recognizing the key item, weakening the crime memory might decrease probe identifiability and reduce diagnostic power. Research on retroactive memory interference (RI) has shown that acquiring new information after encoding a memory can degrade the original memory, which suggests that RI might pose a threat to CITs. To test this, Gronau et al. (2015) had participants complete a mock-crime, followed by either a control task or a RI manipulation task, intended to impair the crime memory. Both the simple guilty control and RI groups were subdivided into three time delay conditions: 1/3 of participants immediately completed the task and CIT, another 1/3 completed the task and returned a week later for the CIT, and the remaining participants completed both the task and CIT a week later. Results showed that RI reduced memory of crime details and skin conductance responses, while respiration line length was unaffected. Here, we extend Gronau et al. (2015), using the Complex Trial Protocol (CTP) version of the P300-based CIT, to investigate the influence of RI on recognition. The CIT effect was obvious in all six group × time delay subconditions, as evidenced by their significantly larger probe vs. irrelevant amplitudes, high percentage of bootstrapped iterations where probe > irrelevants, bootstrapped mean amplitude differences, and satisfactory hit rates. However, these indices of the CIT effect did not differ based on group or time delay, as was the case for target response error rates and P300 latencies. The only outcome of interest to vary by group or time delay was behavioral response times: both probe and combined irrelevant responses were delayed in the control (simple guilty) group. Thus, the evidence suggests that the RI manipulation used here does not threaten the P300-based CTP's accuracy. Results are considered as they compare to previous work, and limitations and possible explanations for our results are discussed.

Cognitive and emotional reactions to questions in the Comparison Question Test

Laypeople's beliefs about the effects of common estimator variables on memory

The effect of confirmation bias and racial stereotypes on perceptions of guilt and interrogation strategy decisions

It's a match!? Appropriate item selection in the Concealed Information Test

Evaluating Physiological Indicators in Detecting Deception and Truthfulness using the Comparison Question Test (CQT)

An Independent Validation of the EEG-Based Complex Trial Protocol with Autobiographical Data and Corroboration of its Resistance to a Cognitively Charged Countermeasure

Interrogative pressure in simulated forensic interviews: the effects of negative feedback

Is the CIT susceptible to misleading information? A constructive replication

Mock jurors' evaluations of eyewitness identification evidence based on appearance change and associated instructions

Countering information leakage in the Concealed Information Test: The effects of item detailedness

Examining levels of processing using verbal & pictorial stimuli with the complex trial protocol in a mock theft scenario

Item Roles Explored in a Modified P300-Based CTP Concealed Information Test

Using Polygraph to Detect Passengers Carrying Illegal Items

Validity of the Reaction Time Concealed Information Test in a Prison Sample

The Cognitive Avoidance Questionnaire: Validation of the English translation

(MIS)measuring cognitive load and arousal in deception: A multitrait–multimethod analysis

Emotional Wellbeing and Cognitive Appraisals Among Law Enforcement Exposed to Child Sexually Explicit Materials

The effect of retroactive memory interference on the P300-based Complex Trial Protocol (CTP)

A cognition-emotion-action sequence: Anticipated emotional consequences of causal attributions and reported communication strategy.

Enhanced detection efficiency in reaction time‐based concealed information test through response preparation interference

Unfeeling or Uncontrolled? PCL-R Subfactor-Specific Anomalies in Psychological Processing During Criminal Behavior