Abstract:BACKGROUND: The optimal transcatheter embolization strategy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains elusive. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of different embolization options for unresectable HCC.METHODS: Medical databases were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating bland transarterial embolization (TAE), conventional TACE, drug-eluting bead chemoembolization (DEB-TACE), or transarterial radioembolization (TARE), either alone or combined with adjuvant chemotherapy, or local liver ablation, or external radiotherapy for unresectable HCC up to June 2017. Random effects Bayesian models with a binomial and normal likelihood were fitted (WinBUGS). Primary endpoint was patient survival expressed as hazard ratios (HR) and 95% credible intervals. An exponential model was used to fit patient survival curves. Safety and objective response were calculated as odds ratios (OR) and accompanying 95% credible intervals. Competing treatments were ranked with the SUCRA statistic. Heterogeneity-adjusted effective sample sizes were calculated to evaluate information size for each comparison. Quality of evidence (QoE) was assessed with the GRADE system adapted for NMA reports. All analyses complied with the ISPOR-AMCP-NCP Task Force Report for good practice in NMA.FINDINGS: The network of evidence included 55 RCTs (12 direct comparisons) with 5,763 patients with preserved liver function and unresectable HCC (intermediate to advanced stage). All embolization strategies achieved a significant survival gain over control treatment (HR range, 0.42-0.76; very low-to-moderate QoE). However, TACE, DEB-TACE, TARE and adjuvant systemic agents did not confer any survival benefit over bland TAE alone (moderate QoE, except low in case of TARE). There was moderate QoE that TACE combined with external radiation or liver ablation achieved the best patient survival (SUCRA 86% and 96%, respectively). Estimated median survival was 13.9 months in control, 18.1 months in TACE, 20.6 months with DEB-TACE, 20.8 months with bland TAE, 30.1 months in TACE plus external radiotherapy, and 33.3 months in TACE plus liver ablation. TARE was the safest treatment (SUCRA 77%), however, all examined therapies were associated with a significantly higher risk of toxicity over control (OR range, 6.35 to 68.5). TACE, DEB-TACE, TARE and adjuvant systemic agents did not improve objective response over bland embolization alone (OR range, 0.85 to 1.65). There was clinical diversity among included randomized controlled trials, but statistical heterogeneity was low.CONCLUSIONS: Chemo- and radio-embolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma may improve tumour objective response and patient survival, but are not more effective than bland particle embolization. Chemoembolization combined with external radiotherapy or local liver ablation may significantly improve tumour response and patient survival rates over embolization monotherapies. Quality of evidence remains mostly low to moderate because of clinical diversity.SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42016035796 (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO).

Cost effectiveness of radioembolization compared with conventional transarterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Evaluation of the Efficacy for Alternated Treatment on Primary Liver Cancer by Interventional Therapy in Combination with Fractionated Stereotactic Conformal Radiotherapy

Surgical Resection Plus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Multifocal Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Transarterial therapies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma eligible for transarterial embolization: a US cost-effectiveness analysis

Transarterial Chemoembolization versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Resection within Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage 0/A: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Comparison between Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization Followed by Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization Alone in BCLC Stage B Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Pilot Study

Comparative effectiveness of different transarterial embolization therapies alone or in combination with local ablative or adjuvant systemic treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

A Comparison of Chemoembolization Combination with and Without Radiotherapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Practical Considerations When Choosing Chemoembolization versus Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Comparison of the Efficacy of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Monotherapy in Patients with Liver Cancer

Randomized Clinical Trial of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Plus Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Intermediate Stage (BCLC Stage B) Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria.

Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Radiofrequency Ablation Delays Tumor Progression and Prolongs Overall Survival in Patients with Intermediate (BCLC B) Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Comparison of Long-Term Survival of Patients with Bclc Stage B Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Liver Resection or Transarterial Chemoembolization

Cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation versus percutaneous ethanol injection for early hepatocellular carcinoma in a resource-poor setting: a randomized trial

Comparison of Transarterial Chemoembolization with Radiofrequency Ablation for Unresectable Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage 0/A Hepatocellular Carcinoma: a Propensity Score Matching.

Long-term Outcomes of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined With Radiofrequency Ablation as an Initial Treatment for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization Combined With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for BCLC Stage B Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Liver resection versus transarterial chemoembolization for the initial treatment of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B hepatocellular carcinoma

The Long-Term Efficacy of Combined Chemoembolization and Local Irradiation in the Treatment of Patients with Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Drug-eluting Microspheres Compared to Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization as First Line Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-center Retrospective Cost-utility Analysis

Comparison Between Chemoembolization Combined with Radiotherapy and Chemoembolization Alone for Large Hepatocellular Carcinoma