Abstract:Noting that many of the nation's high schools are beset with major problems, such as low student reading and math achievement, high dropout rates, and an inadequate supply of effective teachers, Steve Fleischman and Jessica Heppen survey a range of strategies that educators have used to improve low-performing high schools. The authors begin by showing how the standards-based school reform movement, together with the No Child Left Behind Act requirement that underperforming schools adopt reforms supported by scientifically based research, spurred policy makers, educators, and researchers to create and implement a variety of approaches to attain improvement. Fleischman and Heppen then review a number of widely adopted reform models that aim to change "business as usual" in low-performing high schools. The models include comprehensive school reform programs, dual enrollment and early college high schools, smaller learning communities, specialty (for example, career) academies, charter high schools, and education management organizations. In practice, say the authors, many of these improvement efforts overlap, defying neat distinctions. Often, reforms are combined to reinforce one another. The authors explain the theories that drive the reforms, review evidence of their reforms' effectiveness to date, and suggest what it will take to make them work well. Although the reforms are promising, the authors say, few as yet have solid evidence of systematic or sustained success. In concluding, Fleischman and Heppen emphasize that the reasons for a high school's poor performance are so complex that no one reform model or approach, no matter how powerful, can turn around low-performing schools. They also stress the need for educators to implement each reform program with fidelity to its requirements and to support it for the time required for success. Looking to the future, the authors suggest steps that decision makers, researchers, and sponsors of research can take to promote evidence-based progress in education.

Throwing Money at Schools

Contexts of Convenience: Generalizing from Published Evaluations of School Finance Policies

What Impacts Can We Expect from School Spending Policy? Evidence from Evaluations in the United States

Improving Education in the Developing World: What Have We Learned from Randomized Evaluations?

Obstacles and Opportunities: Some Simple Economics of School Finance Reform

Does Money Still Matter? Attainment and Earnings Effects of Post-1990 School Finance Reforms

The return to classroom instruction time in private and public schools

How and where the education dollar is spent

Can Bureaucrats Really Be Paid Like CEOs? School Administrator Incentives for Anemia Reduction in Rural China

The Challenge of Education and Learning in the Developing World

Effects of school choice on the margin: The cream is already skimmed

Principal Stratification Approach to Broken Randomized Experiments

Can Bureaucrats Really Be Paid Like Ceos? Substitution Between Incentives and Resources among School Administrators in China.

Working Paper No . 52 8 Can Bureaucrats Really Be Paid Like CEOs ? School Administrator Incentives for Anemia Reduction in Rural China By

Knowledge capital, growth, and the East Asian miracle

Do Educator Performance Incentives Help Students? Evidence from the Teacher Incentive Fund National Evaluation

The Effect of Funding on Student Achievement: Evidence from District of Columbia, Virginia, and Maryland

How finance-based interventions can improve attainment at school for disadvantaged students: a review of international evidence

Improving low-performing high schools: searching for evidence of promise

Parties in Privatizing American Public Education

Incidence and Outcomes of School Finance Litigation: 1968–2021