Safety of Limb Lengthening after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: An Analysis of the MBSAQIP Database

Jerry T. Dang,Ahmad M. Hider,Juan S. Barajas-Gamboa,Valentin Mocanu,Thomas Shin,Gustavo Romero-Velez,Yung Lee,Salvador Navarrete,John Rodriguez,Matthew Kroh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2023.12.018
IF: 3.709
2024-01-08
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Abstract:Introduction Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) effectively treats severe obesity, but some patients may require revisional surgery like limb lengthening (LL) for postoperative weight gain. This study aims to compare 30-day serious complications and mortality rates between LL and primary RYGB, given limited safety data on LL. Methods Patients who underwent LL and RYGB were identified from the 2020 and 2021 MBSAQIP databases, the only years in which LL data was available. Baseline characteristics and 30-day rates of serious complications and mortality were analyzed. Results A total of 86,990 patients underwent RYGB and 455 underwent LL. Patients undergoing RYGB were younger (44.4 vs 49.8 years, p<0.001), had a higher body mass index (45.5 vs 41.8 kg/m 2 , p<0.001) and higher rates of comorbidities including diabetes (30.0 vs 13.6%, p<0.001). RYGB and LL had similar operative duration (125.3 vs 123.2 minutes, p=0.5). There were no statistical differences between cohorts for length of stay (1.6 RYGB vs 1.6 LL days, p=0.6). After LL, there were higher 30-day rates of reoperation (3.3 vs 1.9%, p=0.03) and deep surgical site infections (1.3 vs 0.5%, p=0.03) compared to RYGB. There were no differences in overall serious complications (5.1 LL vs 5.0% RYGB, p=1.0) and mortality (0.2 LL vs 0.1% RYGB, p=0.5). Multivariable logistic regression adjustment found that previous venous thromboembolism was associated with serious complications after LL. Conclusions When compared to primary RYGB, LL has a favorable safety profile with similar 30-day rates of serious complications and mortality.
surgery
What problem does this paper attempt to address?